AutosTalk Forums  

why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence?

Nascar NASCAR and other professional stock car racing (rec.autos.sport.nascar)


Discuss why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence? in the Nascar forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Fish
 
Posts: n/a

Default why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence? - 07-23-2009 , 06:44 PM






because his hair is "too short"...even if that's true it doesn't look
good on him. I seem to recall reading somewhere a hair sample could be
provided simply from the hairs on a razor...

http://jayski.com/cupnews.htm#news-hair

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Fish
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence? - 07-23-2009 , 06:56 PM






On Jul 23, 6:44*pm, Fish <godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
because his hair is "too short"...even if that's true it doesn't look
good on him. I seem to recall reading somewhere a hair sample could be
provided simply from the hairs on a razor...

http://jayski.com/cupnews.htm#news-hair
just for the record i am in support of mayfield BUT i recently had to
do my first drug test a couple days ago (i am only 18 remember), as i
am entering a law enforcement course in college, that is a suggested
path to enter the police academy to join a police force (no police
force here will hire any one less than 25, so it's pretty much going
to school to waste the next 7 years of my life until i become 25,
though no formal post-secondary is required) and pre-term testing is
required, as well as random tests throughout the year (no point in
becoming a law enforcer if you break them yourself). hair tests were
not performed, but i asked about them because i noticed the
instructor's 88 hat, and we got talking about the mayfield situation,
and i wondered why a hair test wasn't performed and he stated that not
much hair is needed, my hair is about the same length as jeremy's
judging by recent photos and the instructor said hair my length my
would be more than enough. perhaps though, as a pre-screening for
college, the tests conducted would not be as in-depth as one involved
in a highly public legal battle between a billion dollar corporation
and a multi-millionaire "Athlete". for the record, i was clean, tests
only took 24 hours (again not very in-depth i'm assuming), but i have
never used any illegal substances so it was never really a question in
my case :-P beer and whiskey are the only substances i need ;-)


on another note, mayfield seems to be working on a huge sponsorship
deal (he has no team though anymore...) and he sounds quite excited
about it http://jayski.com/cupnews.htm#news41aaa

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Joey Tribiani
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven his innocence? - 07-23-2009 , 07:40 PM



"Fish" <godwin.dave8 (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote


Quote:
just for the record i am in support of mayfield BUT i recently had to
do my first drug test a couple days ago (i am only 18 remember),
18... a good age... I remember then....kind of...




Quote:
(no point in becoming a law enforcer if you break them yourself).
I agree....


Quote:
for the record, i was clean, tests
only took 24 hours (again not very in-depth i'm assuming), but i have
never used any illegal substances so it was never really a question in
my case :-P beer and whiskey are the only substances i need ;-)
If you are 18 as you state in your first statement above, you don't agree
with the second statement above, or your third statement wouldn't even
exist... this assuming you are in th US, of course... because if you are,
the beer and whiskey that are the only substances you need, indeed *are*
illegal for you to consume... shame on you..

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Fish
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence? - 07-23-2009 , 08:11 PM



On Jul 23, 7:40*pm, "Joey Tribiani" <J... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
"Fish" <godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:c9486929-9b40-4044-8537-f765e3b020da (AT) g31g2000yqc (DOT) googlegroups.com...

just for the record i am in support of mayfield BUT i recently had to
do my first drug test a couple days ago (i am only 18 remember),

18... a good age... I remember then....kind of...

(no point in becoming a law enforcer if you break them yourself).

I agree....

for the record, i was clean, tests
only took 24 hours (again not very in-depth i'm assuming), but i have
never used any illegal substances so it was never really a question in
my case :-P beer and whiskey are the only substances i need ;-)

If you are 18 as you state in your first statement above, you don't agree
with the second statement above, or your third statement wouldn't even
exist... this assuming you are in th US, of course... because if you are,
the beer and whiskey that are the only substances you need, indeed *are*
illegal for you to consume... shame on you..
WELL i am 18, and i live in canada actually, where the drinking age is
19 (which doesn't come until february for me), but canada's unique
drinking laws allow for different drinking ages in different
provinces, so though i live in ontario the drinking age is 19, the
town i live in is less than a 20 min drive to quebec, where the
drinking age is 18 (and the beer is cheaper too). also i don't know
how serious police take underage drinking in the US, or even elsewhere
in Canada, but because of this unique geographic layout, it isn't a
strongly enforced law

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
John McCoy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven his innocence? - 07-23-2009 , 08:14 PM



"Joey Tribiani" <Joey (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in
news:jx6am.14834$qx1.9060 (AT) newsfe04 (DOT) iad:

Quote:
If you are 18 as you state in your first statement above, you don't
agree with the second statement above, or your third statement
wouldn't even exist... this assuming you are in th US, of course...
He's in Canuckistan. It's ok there (as are a lot of other things
the morality police in the US don't approve of).

John

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
John McCoy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven his innocence? - 07-23-2009 , 08:17 PM



Fish <godwin.dave8 (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:340e8e56-a6aa-4089-a6ea-
1fb59f4e5590 (AT) y19g2000yqy (DOT) googlegroups.com:

Quote:
because his hair is "too short".
I doubt that's the reason. I have to assume the hair test wouldn't
provide a useful result (perhaps it cannot discriminate between
legally prescribed amphetamines and meth, not as well as a urine
test). Or perhaps Aegis is not equipped to do a hair test, and
NASCAR won't use any other lab. If the hair test would provide
useful results, one side or the other would have insisted upon it
by now.

John

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
bobby
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence? - 07-23-2009 , 09:22 PM



Fish wrote:

Quote:
in a highly public legal battle between a billion dollar corporation
and a multi-millionaire "Athlete". for the record, i was clean, tests
only took 24 hours (again not very in-depth i'm assuming), but i have
never used any illegal substances so it was never really a question in
my case :-P beer and whiskey are the only substances i need ;-)


on another note, mayfield seems to be working on a huge sponsorship
deal (he has no team though anymore...) and he sounds quite excited
about it http://jayski.com/cupnews.htm#news41aaa

then you are an underage drug user

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Fish
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence? - 07-23-2009 , 10:20 PM



On Jul 23, 9:22*pm, bobby <speak... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
Fish wrote:
in a highly public legal battle between a billion dollar corporation
and a multi-millionaire "Athlete". *for the record, i was clean, tests
only took 24 hours (again not very in-depth i'm assuming), but i have
never used any illegal substances so it was never really a question in
my case :-P beer and whiskey are the only substances i need ;-)

on another note, mayfield seems to be working on a huge sponsorship
deal (he has no team though anymore...) and he sounds quite excited
about ithttp://jayski.com/cupnews.htm#news41aaa

then you are an underage drug user
i thought we already went over this...im not underage in my country

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven his innocence? - 07-24-2009 , 12:00 AM



"Joey Tribiani" <Joey (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Fish" <godwin.dave8 (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:c9486929-9b40-4044-8537-f765e3b020da (AT) g31g2000yqc (DOT) googlegroups.com...

just for the record i am in support of mayfield BUT i recently had to
do my first drug test a couple days ago (i am only 18 remember),

18... a good age... I remember then....kind of...
Bull. No one who was really 18 at one time remembers it. I think... Well,
ok - maybe we remember some of the things of being 18. Like the free love
movement, ban the bra, and some other historic events that made this country
great.



Quote:
If you are 18 as you state in your first statement above, you don't agree
with the second statement above, or your third statement wouldn't even
exist... this assuming you are in th US, of course... because if you are,
the beer and whiskey that are the only substances you need, indeed *are*
illegal for you to consume... shame on you..


Aren't there still some 18 states left? Maybe not, but I thought there
were.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) windstream (DOT) net

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Fish
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: why hasn't mayfield simply just plucked a hair and proven hisinnocence? - 07-24-2009 , 12:18 AM



On Jul 24, 12:00*am, "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREM... (AT) windstream (DOT) net>
wrote:
Quote:
"Joey Tribiani" <J... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:jx6am.14834$qx1.9060 (AT) newsfe04 (DOT) iad...



"Fish" <godwin.da... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:c9486929-9b40-4044-8537-f765e3b020da (AT) g31g2000yqc (DOT) googlegroups.com....

just for the record i am in support of mayfield BUT i recently had to
do my first drug test a couple days ago (i am only 18 remember),

18... a good age... I remember then....kind of...

Bull. *No one who was really 18 at one time remembers it. *I think...*Well,
ok - maybe we remember some of the things of being 18. *Like the free love
movement, ban the bra, and some other historic events that made this country
great.



If you are 18 as you state in your first statement above, you don't agree
with the second statement above, or your third statement wouldn't even
exist... this assuming you are in th US, of course... because if you are,
the beer and whiskey that are the only substances you need, indeed *are*
illegal for you to consume... shame on you..

Aren't there still some 18 states left? *Maybe not, but I thought there
were.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREM... (AT) windstream (DOT) net
um well being canadian i ain't too familiar with american laws, but as
far as i know drinking age is 21 in all states, 18 though for tobacco
(with some exceptions being 19)


and only time will tell if i remember being 18 i guess :-P

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.