Would I be correct...

#21

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:45:51 -0500, RIP#3 <not_here_nor_there (AT) anywhere (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

I simply made a point that a million dollars isn't really that much ok? If anyone can explain this again to Paul, he might get it the third time, kind of like second grade....

Why would you think you needed to state the obvious to the people who read this
newsgroup? I have discovered in a very short time the people here, for the most
part anyway, are intelligent, considerate and civil. I am sure they and PE2
already knew there were many many vehicles on the road hauling around a million
dollars or more. Did you have reason to believe they wouldn't know that
already? Or, do you just like to see your words in print all the time?

Oh! And by the way Red. I couldn't find the invitation from PE2 OR myself
inviting you to comment. Isn't that what you always say to others? "Who
invited you to comment?" ?? It works both ways fella.

#22

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:57:58 GMT, "SimRacer" <nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

Whether or not that meant "2 per car" I donut know, but I assumed it meant something like that.

No no not two per car SimRacer. Two haulers per car number. That would be a
primary and secondary car #48 in one hauler and a primary and secondary car #48
in a second hauler. That way while one hauler is leaving California Speedway
for Charlotte, NC (for example) the second hauler could be leaving from
Charlote, NC going to Las Vegas for next weeks race.

Is that what you meant also?

#23

WOW! What an -incredible- comeback! I mean, that was just AMAZING.
You, whatever your name is, are simply stupefying in the way you meld
the language to craft such finely honed barbs, barbs which you flick
with such frightening accuracy as to render onlookers speechless, wholly
in awe of your command and competence.

Bravo. No, really. Well done.

If you've quite finished making a towering green cum-dumpster of
yourself, though, (and we're talking industrial plant capacity here, no
doubt) maybe you ought to just scuttle back under the keyboard from
whence you were ejaculated before another human being has to waste the
five seconds it takes to see what you write and subsequently discard it
as utterly worthless drivel for which the time lost perusing will surely
come back to haunt them on their deathbed as moments well and truly
misspent.

PS, when did I say I was going to killfile, oh damn there I go making
things up again.... ahem, excuse me.... *plonk* you? Why would I
want to? You are my litle bitch to slap around...

Paul wrote:

Quote:

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:39:30 -0500, RIP#3 <not_here_nor_there (AT) anywhere (DOT) com
wrote:

you seriously need fucking help dipshit. Get a fucking life, I don't
care if you are the poster child for birth control, you really need to
expand your horizon beyond that fucking double wide and see what the
world has to offer...

What is the matter Red? You can't refute anything I have said so you have to
revert to your PWT, ignorant, foulmouthed self? Or perhaps you never had
anything else to work with?

You can dish out your crap, Red. But you sure can't take it. By the way Red, I
thought you had Plonked me. Not even man enough to do that are you?

Okay Red. I am finished with you. I am getting no pleasure attacking an unarmed
guttersnipe with a tank.

Just try to learn one thing; If you treat people with respect you get respect in
return. Try it. You will be astonished at the wonderful conversations you can
have with people.

Oh! And by the way, it isn't a doublewide. It is only a single wide.

Paul wrote:

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:30:31 -0500, RIP#3 <not_here_nor_there (AT) anywhere (DOT) com
wrote:

I know I am getting old and don't see as well as I use to, but where does it say
"Poor Robbie?"; or even poor Robby?

Some of you guys need to get a life! You are so desperate to find errors in
what others say or to find opinions contrary to your own so you can try to
belittle them that you simply make things up!?

Now go take a shower and put on some clean clothes.

follow me here.... If something bad is going to happen it will be to

Michael Waltrip or Robby Gordon.

Did you type that dickwad? Yes you did you fucking twat!

Yes I did smegma breath. What has that got to do with "Poor Robbie?"

What does that mean!?!?

You mean to tell us you are making comments and don't even know that they mean?!
Yes --- now that I think about it you do seem to do that a lot.

Tell me how anything bad had happened to Robbie Gordon?

Well --- how many engines did he blow last season? How many times did he crash
his car? How many flat tires did he have? Seems to me if Robbie didn't have bad
luck he wouldn't have any luck at all.

Tell me how something bad has happened to his career.

You are doing it again Red. You are making things up. Where did anyone say
something bad has happened to his career?

He creates his own bad rep, he has been given to many chances.

And again you just make it up as you go along. Where did anyone mention his
reputation?

Quit being a dick...

Does that mean quit pointing out your inane comments?

What shit did I make up mother fucker?

I have been pointing them out all along. Do you need them listed sequentially
in order to understand?

By the way, that is the first true statement you have made. My wife is indeed a
mother. See how much better it is when you don't make things up?

Go back to your little fucking hole, you god damn excuse for a fucking human.

You know Red --- you have the makings of a good fiction writer. However, you
will have to increase your vocabulary just a bit.

#24

Paul wrote:

Quote:

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:45:51 -0500, RIP#3 <not_here_nor_there (AT) anywhere (DOT) com
wrote:

I simply made a point that a million dollars isn't really that much ok? If anyone can explain this again to Paul, he might get it the third time, kind of like second grade....

Why would you think you needed to state the obvious to the people who read this
newsgroup? I have discovered in a very short time the people here, for the most
part anyway, are intelligent, considerate and civil. I am sure they and PE2
already knew there were many many vehicles on the road hauling around a million
dollars or more. Did you have reason to believe they wouldn't know that
already? Or, do you just like to see your words in print all the time?

Oh! And by the way Red. I couldn't find the invitation from PE2 OR myself
inviting you to comment. Isn't that what you always say to others? "Who
invited you to comment?" ?? It works both ways fella.

Yup, always.... last night was the first, but okay if you want to call
that always. If you and everyone else are so intelligebt "for the most
part anyways" why would the obvious have to be stated? It seems to be
that if a million dollars wasn't seen as a big deal it would never have
been stated? Still following this big fella? If it were a $400 tire on
a RCR pickup would that have been big enough of a deal to talk about?
Now I'm sure you will reply with some not so adequated, mean nothing
response, and thats okay becasue as long as you follow me and every
comment I make around this newsgroup I know that it out of envy (cause
thats what envious people do you know), yup you can try to tear apart
everything I say and turn it into something its not... hey the media
does it all the time, so maybe there is hope you'll find a job someday.
Anyways, come on Shadow, we need to go find another thread...

#25

"Paul" <ME (AT) MYISP (DOT) COM> wrote

Quote:

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:57:58 GMT, "SimRacer" <nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:

Whether or not that meant "2 per car" I donut know, but I assumed it
meant something like that.

No no not two per car SimRacer. Two haulers per car number. That would be
a
primary and secondary car #48 in one hauler and a primary and secondary
car #48
in a second hauler. That way while one hauler is leaving California
Speedway
for Charlotte, NC (for example) the second hauler could be leaving from
Charlote, NC going to Las Vegas for next weeks race.

Is that what you meant also?

Yes, "per car" meant "per number". The way the owners made it sound, they'd
occasionally need identical haulers for each car (#, team, whatever) so that
one could be headed to the West Coast on the occasion when the "other"
hauler was still bringing cars in from some prior race closer to home, but
not close enough to facilitate sufficient turnaround times to get cars out
to Sonoma, Fontana, Vegas or Phoenix on time for the next week's race.

When I referred to a "car" in this sense/context, I meant the whole team.
The rig and its trailer, 1ea primary and backup cars, pit equipment, etc.

#26

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:56:30 GMT, "SimRacer" <nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

Yes, "per car" meant "per number". The way the owners made it sound, they'd
occasionally need identical haulers for each car (#, team, whatever) so that
one could be headed to the West Coast on the occasion when the "other"
hauler was still bringing cars in from some prior race closer to home, but
not close enough to facilitate sufficient turnaround times to get cars out
to Sonoma, Fontana, Vegas or Phoenix on time for the next week's race.

When I referred to a "car" in this sense/context, I meant the whole team.
The rig and its trailer, 1ea primary and backup cars, pit equipment, etc.

Yup, we are on the same page. When I started this thread I figured they must
have two haulers but wasn't sure so I thought I'd ask. That would be a lot of
travel in very little time for one hauler.

Even the motorhome has a tough trip going from track to track without the
interveining trips to home base.

#27

"Paul" <ME (AT) MYISP (DOT) COM> wrote

Quote:

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:56:30 GMT, "SimRacer" <nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:

Yes, "per car" meant "per number". The way the owners made it sound,
they'd
occasionally need identical haulers for each car (#, team, whatever) so
that
one could be headed to the West Coast on the occasion when the "other"
hauler was still bringing cars in from some prior race closer to home,
but
not close enough to facilitate sufficient turnaround times to get cars
out
to Sonoma, Fontana, Vegas or Phoenix on time for the next week's race.

When I referred to a "car" in this sense/context, I meant the whole team.
The rig and its trailer, 1ea primary and backup cars, pit equipment, etc.

Yup, we are on the same page. When I started this thread I figured they
must
have two haulers but wasn't sure so I thought I'd ask. That would be a
lot of
travel in very little time for one hauler.

Even the motorhome has a tough trip going from track to track without the
interveining trips to home base.

You should see the mileage on some of these motorcoaches when they go up for
sale locally after they're "used up". I saw one at a Tom Johnson RV lot a
while back that had more than 600k miles on the odo. And was only a couple
maybe three model years old...

#28

"SimRacer" <nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

"Paul" <ME (AT) MYISP (DOT) COM> wrote in message
news:088up1ptb63qulivh31sketinj0ocmtq1p (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:56:30 GMT, "SimRacer"
nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:

Yes, "per car" meant "per number". The way the owners made it sound,
they'd
occasionally need identical haulers for each car (#, team, whatever) so
that
one could be headed to the West Coast on the occasion when the "other"
hauler was still bringing cars in from some prior race closer to home,
but
not close enough to facilitate sufficient turnaround times to get cars
out
to Sonoma, Fontana, Vegas or Phoenix on time for the next week's race.

When I referred to a "car" in this sense/context, I meant the whole
team.
The rig and its trailer, 1ea primary and backup cars, pit equipment,
etc.

Yup, we are on the same page. When I started this thread I figured they
must
have two haulers but wasn't sure so I thought I'd ask. That would be a
lot of
travel in very little time for one hauler.

Even the motorhome has a tough trip going from track to track without
the
interveining trips to home base.

You should see the mileage on some of these motorcoaches when they go up
for
sale locally after they're "used up". I saw one at a Tom Johnson RV lot a
while back that had more than 600k miles on the odo. And was only a couple
maybe three model years old...

600K miles in three years??? 200,000 a year? That's what... 548 miles per
day, 365 days per year. Kinda hard to believe.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net

#29

"Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:

"SimRacer" <nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:XyYnf.1273$7A4.167310 (AT) twister (DOT) southeast.rr.com...

"Paul" <ME (AT) MYISP (DOT) COM> wrote in message
news:088up1ptb63qulivh31sketinj0ocmtq1p (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:56:30 GMT, "SimRacer"
nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:

Yes, "per car" meant "per number". The way the owners made it sound,
they'd
occasionally need identical haulers for each car (#, team, whatever)
so
that
one could be headed to the West Coast on the occasion when the
"other"
hauler was still bringing cars in from some prior race closer to
home,
but
not close enough to facilitate sufficient turnaround times to get
cars
out
to Sonoma, Fontana, Vegas or Phoenix on time for the next week's
race.

When I referred to a "car" in this sense/context, I meant the whole
team.
The rig and its trailer, 1ea primary and backup cars, pit equipment,
etc.

Yup, we are on the same page. When I started this thread I figured
they
must
have two haulers but wasn't sure so I thought I'd ask. That would be
a
lot of
travel in very little time for one hauler.

Even the motorhome has a tough trip going from track to track without
the
interveining trips to home base.

You should see the mileage on some of these motorcoaches when they go up
for
sale locally after they're "used up". I saw one at a Tom Johnson RV lot
a
while back that had more than 600k miles on the odo. And was only a
couple
maybe three model years old...

600K miles in three years??? 200,000 a year? That's what... 548 miles
per
day, 365 days per year. Kinda hard to believe.

--
Thats only 274 miles one way. you have to drive back ya know...

HTH

Quote:

G

#30

"Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:

"SimRacer" <nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:XyYnf.1273$7A4.167310 (AT) twister (DOT) southeast.rr.com...

"Paul" <ME (AT) MYISP (DOT) COM> wrote in message
news:088up1ptb63qulivh31sketinj0ocmtq1p (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:56:30 GMT, "SimRacer"
nOspaM@simracer68 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:

Yes, "per car" meant "per number". The way the owners made it sound,
they'd
occasionally need identical haulers for each car (#, team, whatever)
so
that
one could be headed to the West Coast on the occasion when the
"other"
hauler was still bringing cars in from some prior race closer to
home,
but
not close enough to facilitate sufficient turnaround times to get
cars
out
to Sonoma, Fontana, Vegas or Phoenix on time for the next week's
race.

When I referred to a "car" in this sense/context, I meant the whole
team.
The rig and its trailer, 1ea primary and backup cars, pit equipment,
etc.

Yup, we are on the same page. When I started this thread I figured
they
must
have two haulers but wasn't sure so I thought I'd ask. That would be
a
lot of
travel in very little time for one hauler.

Even the motorhome has a tough trip going from track to track without
the
interveining trips to home base.

You should see the mileage on some of these motorcoaches when they go up
for
sale locally after they're "used up". I saw one at a Tom Johnson RV lot
a
while back that had more than 600k miles on the odo. And was only a
couple
maybe three model years old...

600K miles in three years??? 200,000 a year? That's what... 548 miles
per
day, 365 days per year. Kinda hard to believe.

Just telling you what I saw myself. Believe it or don't, I don't really
care.

Quote:

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE (AT) alltel (DOT) net