![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Watch out! Many Japanese products use timing belts with non-free running (interference) engines. When, not if, the belt skips or breaks, your engine and $8,000 is gone. Even if you get through the warranty period, the resale takes a big hit because the word has got around. |
|
Auto makers, heed this warning. The public knows gear, shaft, or chain driven single or double OHC engines are are safe design. Timing belt driven setups are not. |
|
Suzuki is an exception. Their cars are okay. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"George Orwell" <nobody (AT) mixmaster (DOT) it> wrote in message news:ec813952b460ac615bc8b58fc606cd73 (AT) mixmaster (DOT) it... Watch out! Many Japanese products use timing belts with non-free running (interference) engines. When, not if, the belt skips or breaks, your engine and $8,000 is gone. Even if you get through the warranty period, the resale takes a big hit because the word has got around. Really? Japanese cars still have high resale values compared to their American competitors. Auto makers, heed this warning. The public knows gear, shaft, or chain driven single or double OHC engines are are safe design. Timing belt driven setups are not. Really, now? Most members of the general public don't even know what a timing belt is. Suzuki is an exception. Their cars are okay. Yeah, like you know. Like it's not trolling to multiple post this in honda, toyota, nissan |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
uninformed and never-the-less opinionated troll crap deleted ... ... double OHC engines are safe design. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
What happens with a stretched or broken timing chain? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Watch out! Many Japanese products use timing belts with non-free running (interference) engines. When, not if, the belt skips or breaks, your engine and $8,000 is gone. Even if you get through the warranty period, the resale takes a big hit because the word has got around. Auto makers, heed this warning. The public knows gear, shaft, or chain driven single or double OHC engines are are safe design. Timing belt driven setups are not. Suzuki is an exception. Their cars are okay. 6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other. I've had a timing gear fail, I've |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
MAT wrote: What happens with a stretched or broken timing chain? I have 110k miles on 2002 K20A3 and I had belted Honda before this. Still runs great and I guess it was kinda cool I didn't have to do or pay for the timing belt service. What's the downside and eventual maintenance of timing chain? #1 problem is chain stretch - that leads to cam timing issues and noise. belts are quiet, highly reliable within their stated mileage limit, and don't stretch. long term, you'll get more out of a well maintained belted engine than what is basically supposed to be an unmaintained chain engine. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
George Orwell wrote: Watch out! Many Japanese products use timing belts with non-free running (interference) engines. When, not if, the belt skips or breaks, your engine and $8,000 is gone. Even if you get through the warranty period, the resale takes a big hit because the word has got around. Auto makers, heed this warning. The public knows gear, shaft, or chain driven single or double OHC engines are are safe design. Timing belt driven setups are not. Suzuki is an exception. Their cars are okay. 6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other. I've had a timing gear fail, I've had chains fail, I've had timing belts fail. I kinda prefer the timing belts all in all, quieter, better valve timing. I've never seen a chevy V8 that didn't have a lot of slack in the timing chain after 80K miles. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Michael Pardee wrote: "jim beam" <spamvor... (AT) bad (DOT) example.net> wrote in message news L6dnQQf0ft974nbnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d (AT) speakeasy (DOT) net...MAT wrote: What happens with a stretched or broken timing chain? I have 110k miles on 2002 K20A3 and I had belted Honda before this. Still runs great and I guess it was kinda cool I didn't have to do or pay for the timing belt service. What's the downside and eventual maintenance of timing chain? #1 problem is chain stretch - that leads to cam timing issues and noise. belts are quiet, highly reliable within their stated mileage limit, and don't stretch. long term, you'll get more out of a well maintained belted engine than what is basically supposed to be an unmaintained chain engine. |
|
Newer timing chains appear to be much improved. Several people in the Prius forums I frequent are right around 200K miles and have not had timing chain problems. There is no schedule for changing the chain, either. Disclaimer - not enough data for a positive answer yet. Mike well, chains work, but belts are a better technical solution. particularly for high performance engines - less momentum and angular velocity fluctuation. don't forget, design criteria these days are all about life limitation and cheapness - chain wins on both counts. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |