AutosTalk Forums  

Opinions please

Nissan Maxima Discussion of the Nissan Maxima Automobile (alt.autos.nissan.maxima)


Discuss Opinions please in the Nissan Maxima forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Codifus
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 12-29-2005 , 11:09 AM






NJ Vike wrote:
Quote:
Thanks.

Does it have torque steer? The 2006 I tested did but that was only if you
floored it.

The 2004-2006 Maxima are 99% the same car with minor enhancements
through the years. For 2006, they finally got the grille rightYou'll
always experience torque steer only when you floor it. Since the
drivetrain hasn't changed in these years, the torque steer issue will be
the same for all of them.

You will find that any car that is pushing 250+ hp through the front
wheels only is bound to experience torque steer. Look at the Acura TL,
the Altima 3.5 and of course, the Maxima. They have all pretty much
reached the limit of how much power you can push thorugh the front wheels.

I'm almost willing to bet that if the next generation Maxima has upped
the ante to 300+ hp, as is usually the case, you will see a 4wd system
on it. 300 hp through the front wheels would be downright dangerous.

CD


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Codifus
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 12-29-2005 , 11:18 AM






Dell wrote:
....
Quote:
Negatives:
1. Very large turning radius probably due to long wheel base (provides very
generous cabin space) front wheel drive and 18" low profile tires. Makes
maneuvering in parking lots cumbersome but gives you a back seat that is
suitable for grownups.

The large turning radius is also due to limiting the turning angle in
the CV joints. Because you own such a powerfull FWD car, those beefed up
CV joints sacrifice turning angle in order to handle all that power. Oh,
and if you could turn the wheel any more, the torque steer would even be
worse.

CD


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
NJ Vike
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 12-29-2005 , 08:22 PM



"Codifus" <codifus (AT) optonline (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
I'm almost willing to bet that if the next generation Maxima has upped the
ante to 300+ hp, as is usually the case, you will see a 4wd system on it.
300 hp through the front wheels would be downright dangerous.

CD
Just like the Acura RL.

I'm willing to wager that Nissan will do this right after I purchase one :-(







Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
NJ Vike
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 12-29-2005 , 08:24 PM



Thanks. I think I'm sold on the Maxima :-)


Ken

"Dell" <wry26 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
We own an 04 Maxima SE 5sp Auto with sun roof. It was purchased new at the
beginning of the model run (spring 03). This is our second Max (first was
a
92 SE 5sp. We also have owned two Honda Accord coupes during this period
(Currently we have a 96 4cyl EX 5sp. Accord Coupe). The Maxes have been
significantly more reliable than the Accords. All of these cars were
purchased new. Our 04 has had no issues that required any warranty work or
any work at all.

Re our current Max, yes you can feel torque steer if you floor it, but
given
the large smooth torque band and the 5speed auto you will rarely have to.
The car has authoritative power at any speed and almost any RPM. If you do
floor it is wise to hang on not just because of the torque steer but
because
of the amazing increase in speed particularly in the 30- 80m/h range. Gas
mileage is pretty good 22+ in town, 27 at 75m/h.

Negatives:
1. Very large turning radius probably due to long wheel base (provides
very
generous cabin space) front wheel drive and 18" low profile tires. Makes
maneuvering in parking lots cumbersome but gives you a back seat that is
suitable for grownups.

2. Noisy expensive low profile tires. With 32,000 miles on the V series
Good
years I am torn between wanting to replace them with something better and
the cost of replacing them $220+ per tire. Replacement will probably be
needed by 40,000 miles.

For reference until this August we lived in MA and all cars were driven in
city traffic and in the far left lane of the Mass Pike.


"NJ Vike" <ErieLackawanna (AT) Scranton (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:WNssf.10330$3Z.7302 (AT) newsread1 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net...
Thanks for the post.



"Djavdet" <djavdet (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1135702944.306874.189630 (AT) g47g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Hi,
I have Maxima 02. I'm pretty happy with it since i don't really put too
much efforts to maintain it and it still runs pretty well. But to
repair it is a reall hassle and very expensive. I was told that TL/CL
from Acura are more reliable but they're more expensive too. Maxima
though has more fun to drive IMHO. In overall i'd say it's a good car
but is not lexus in reliablity wise.








Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
NJ Vike
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 01-05-2006 , 08:29 AM



One more question. Does the Maxima require premium fuel?

Thanks


"NJ Vike" <ErieLackawanna (AT) Scranton (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Greetings,

I'm seriously considering purchasing the Maxima but would first like to
hear from some owners on their experience; both positive and negative, if
any, would be appreciated.

I have driven both the SE and SL and don't feel that much of a difference
when I hit some bumps. I did notice a lot of torque-steer when I punched
it on both models. I don't think this is too bad since I won't be doing
this all the time.

Anyway, the car has lots of room and I like it.

Regards

Ken

--
"Now Phoebe Snow direct can go
from thirty-third to Buffalo.
From Broadway bright the tubes run right
Into the Road of Anthracite"
Erie - Lackawanna







Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
njmodi
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 01-05-2006 , 10:45 AM



Premium fuel is recommend for optimum performance (i.e. best power,
mpg). The car will operate fine on 87 octane, but with retarded
timing.

Here is my take on the matter: If you can afford a new Maxima, you can
surely afford the extra $2 per tank to use premium fuel.

Cheers,
Nirav
96 Max GLE, 128k


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
You_Know_Who~
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 01-05-2006 , 04:06 PM



I have found I get better milage using 91 octane gas. Enough to make up the
difference in cost.

"njmodi" <njmodi2 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Premium fuel is recommend for optimum performance (i.e. best power,
mpg). The car will operate fine on 87 octane, but with retarded
timing.

Here is my take on the matter: If you can afford a new Maxima, you can
surely afford the extra $2 per tank to use premium fuel.

Cheers,
Nirav
96 Max GLE, 128k



Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
NJ Vike
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 01-05-2006 , 04:57 PM



I guess I have options then. Great.

Is this new Altima with the 3.5 going to outrun the Maxima? I'm referring to
this new one that has come out.

Ken




"You_Know_Who~" <you.know.who (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
I have found I get better milage using 91 octane gas. Enough to make up
the
difference in cost.

"njmodi" <njmodi2 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1136475910.573373.163020 (AT) g47g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Premium fuel is recommend for optimum performance (i.e. best power,
mpg). The car will operate fine on 87 octane, but with retarded
timing.

Here is my take on the matter: If you can afford a new Maxima, you can
surely afford the extra $2 per tank to use premium fuel.

Cheers,
Nirav
96 Max GLE, 128k





Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Codifus
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 01-06-2006 , 01:58 PM



That's a good question. I assume you're talking about the Altima SER.
The Altima and Maxima are the same platform. With more creature comforts
like NAV etc, the maxima will be heavier but both the Maxima and Alt SER
have 18" rims, the Alt SER's rims are forged, therefore a wee bit
lighter, so the SER should be faster, but only a little.


I would think that the Altima SE 3.5 would be fast, if not the fastest.
Yes, it's 10 hp down from the 2 cars mentioned above, but it has 17"
rims, less rotational mass to deal with, and nearly the same hp. The SE
3.5 comes with a 5 speed stick as opposed to a 6 speed stick that the
others come with. The biggest advantage to the 6 speed is good mpg at
highway cruising and better mid-throttle acceleration in city driving.
In full out mode, though, the difference between the 6 speed manual and
5 speed shouldn't be so great, thanks to the beefy torque curve of the
VQ35. Sweetest V6 on the planet.

It's a sleeper

CD




NJ Vike wrote:
Quote:
I guess I have options then. Great.

Is this new Altima with the 3.5 going to outrun the Maxima? I'm referring to
this new one that has come out.

Ken




"You_Know_Who~" <you.know.who (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:KTfvf.227909$qk4.108358 (AT) bgtnsc05-news (DOT) ops.worldnet.att.net...

I have found I get better milage using 91 octane gas. Enough to make up
the
difference in cost.

"njmodi" <njmodi2 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1136475910.573373.163020 (AT) g47g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Premium fuel is recommend for optimum performance (i.e. best power,
mpg). The car will operate fine on 87 octane, but with retarded
timing.

Here is my take on the matter: If you can afford a new Maxima, you can
surely afford the extra $2 per tank to use premium fuel.

Cheers,
Nirav
96 Max GLE, 128k





Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
NJ Vike
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Opinions please - 01-06-2006 , 08:48 PM



Yes, that's the one. I think the SER might out run the Maxima but as you
say, not by much. I still like the room and styling of the Maxima. I'm
looking forward to getting one very soon.

Ken



"Codifus" <codifus (AT) optonline (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
That's a good question. I assume you're talking about the Altima SER. The
Altima and Maxima are the same platform. With more creature comforts like
NAV etc, the maxima will be heavier but both the Maxima and Alt SER have
18" rims, the Alt SER's rims are forged, therefore a wee bit lighter, so
the SER should be faster, but only a little.


I would think that the Altima SE 3.5 would be fast, if not the fastest.
Yes, it's 10 hp down from the 2 cars mentioned above, but it has 17" rims,
less rotational mass to deal with, and nearly the same hp. The SE 3.5
comes with a 5 speed stick as opposed to a 6 speed stick that the others
come with. The biggest advantage to the 6 speed is good mpg at highway
cruising and better mid-throttle acceleration in city driving. In full out
mode, though, the difference between the 6 speed manual and 5 speed
shouldn't be so great, thanks to the beefy torque curve of the VQ35.
Sweetest V6 on the planet.

It's a sleeper

CD




NJ Vike wrote:
I guess I have options then. Great.

Is this new Altima with the 3.5 going to outrun the Maxima? I'm referring
to this new one that has come out.

Ken




"You_Know_Who~" <you.know.who (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:KTfvf.227909$qk4.108358 (AT) bgtnsc05-news (DOT) ops.worldnet.att.net...

I have found I get better milage using 91 octane gas. Enough to make up
the
difference in cost.

"njmodi" <njmodi2 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1136475910.573373.163020 (AT) g47g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Premium fuel is recommend for optimum performance (i.e. best power,
mpg). The car will operate fine on 87 octane, but with retarded
timing.

Here is my take on the matter: If you can afford a new Maxima, you can
surely afford the extra $2 per tank to use premium fuel.

Cheers,
Nirav
96 Max GLE, 128k





Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.