AutosTalk Forums  

Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55

Porsche Discussions About Porsche Automobiles (alt.autos.porsche)


Discuss Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 in the Porsche forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Dogger
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-10-2006 , 03:56 PM






I have a limited vocabulary retard.

"Dori A Schmetterling" <ng (AT) nospam (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
Just curious: why do you have to make rude comments? Reflects more on you
than anyone else? Perhaps you have limited vocabulary?

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Dogger" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:MZpsg.31569$Xp3.18149 (AT) newsfe4-gui (DOT) ntli.net...


The only rich asian kid i knew made his money by sucking dick.
What's your story boy, have you got a grove in your tongue from sucking
sausage?






Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
RichAsianKid
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-10-2006 , 06:53 PM






Dogger wrote:
Quote:
The only rich asian kid i knew made his money by sucking dick.
What's your story boy, have you got a grove in your tongue from sucking
sausage?
Tell us more about this "rich asian kid" that you know. How much money
did (s)he make? Not sure if this subject is appropriate for these
newsgroups though. (You should go to soc.* newsgroups - they're more
fun if you want to discuss personal details!)



Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
RichAsianKid
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-10-2006 , 06:55 PM




Richard Sexton wrote:
Quote:
In article <1152500883.892814.116850 (AT) 75g2000cwc (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
RichAsianKid <richasiankid (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Richard Sexton wrote:
In article <J3%rg.10587$Nv.8919@fed1read10>,
Lawrence Lugar <lawrence_lugar (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote:
the mercedes is a sissy status-seeking sport's car,

The 6's were. The 55 will out-evrything the Prosche.


The CLK 63 (481hp) is coming out; any word on whether a SLK 63 is in
the works? But then maybe that'll make it too 'hood-heavy' assuming
it's heavier than the 55 equivalent.

Beats me. All I know about new cars is what I see on Top Gear. I only
know old cars.

--
A good site is autospies http://www.autospies.com/ Some say it's
biased towards BMWs but I don't think so.


Quote:
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net


Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
RichAsianKid
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-10-2006 , 06:55 PM




Richard Sexton wrote:
Quote:
In article <1152500883.892814.116850 (AT) 75g2000cwc (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
RichAsianKid <richasiankid (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Richard Sexton wrote:
In article <J3%rg.10587$Nv.8919@fed1read10>,
Lawrence Lugar <lawrence_lugar (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote:
the mercedes is a sissy status-seeking sport's car,

The 6's were. The 55 will out-evrything the Prosche.


The CLK 63 (481hp) is coming out; any word on whether a SLK 63 is in
the works? But then maybe that'll make it too 'hood-heavy' assuming
it's heavier than the 55 equivalent.

Beats me. All I know about new cars is what I see on Top Gear. I only
know old cars.

--
A good site is autospies http://www.autospies.com/ Some say it's
biased towards BMWs but I don't think so.


Quote:
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net


Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
Filmophile
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 01:48 AM



A. There won't be an SLK63 for two reasons:
1. The SLK can't take that engine (it's to heavy anyhow)
2. MB is trying to give people a reason to spend more cash on the
CLK model

B. The only time the SLK55 has ever taken favor over the Boxster was in
that sill Top Gear comparison. Overall, the Boxster is considered the
shining star in it's class and the the new engine lineup and suspension
tweks that are coming for '07 are only going to help. I'll refer all to
the following for final words:
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...-cayman-s.html

Keep in mind the 2007 Boxster S is effectively a Cayman S minus the
hard roofline.


Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old   
Dori A Schmetterling
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 03:14 AM



Journalists' opinion is that Boxster drivers have it as a consolation prize
as they would rather be driving a 911...

;-)
DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Filmophile" <Filmophilia (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
A. There won't be an SLK63 for two reasons:
1. The SLK can't take that engine (it's to heavy anyhow)
2. MB is trying to give people a reason to spend more cash on the
CLK model

B. The only time the SLK55 has ever taken favor over the Boxster was in
that sill Top Gear comparison. Overall, the Boxster is considered the
shining star in it's class and the the new engine lineup and suspension
tweks that are coming for '07 are only going to help. I'll refer all to
the following for final words:
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...-cayman-s.html

Keep in mind the 2007 Boxster S is effectively a Cayman S minus the
hard roofline.




Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old   
greek_philosophizer
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 10:56 AM




RichAsianKid wrote:
Quote:
Which of the above is the best roadster? What do people think?


If you really are rich, just get all three and save yourself the effort
of deciding.

..



Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old   
Dori A Schmetterling
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 12:39 PM



No, worse. Just shifts the decision to every day. Makes for a problem
every morning... (What do I drive today...?...)

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---
"greek_philosophizer" <greek_philosophizer (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
[...]

If you really are rich, just get all three and save yourself the effort
of deciding.

.




Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old   
Steve Heath
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 01:12 PM



"Dori A Schmetterling" <ng (AT) nospam (DOT) co.uk> wrote


Quote:
---
"greek_philosophizer" <greek_philosophizer (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1152633416.398331.230410 (AT) 35g2000cwc (DOT) googlegroups.com...
If you really are rich, just get all three and save yourself the effort
of deciding.

No, worse. Just shifts the decision to every day. Makes for a problem
every morning... (What do I drive today...?...)

DAS
I need more problems like that.

--
Steve Heath




Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old   
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 01:53 PM



In article <NtmdnagcmPqAwy7ZRVnytQ (AT) pipex (DOT) net>,
Dori A Schmetterling <ng (AT) nospam (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
Journalists' opinion is that Boxster drivers have it as a consolation
prize as they would rather be driving a 911...
;-)
Well, yes, but journalists don't pay for their cars...

--
*Why isn't there a special name for the back of your knee?

Dave Plowman dave (AT) davenoise (DOT) co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.