AutosTalk Forums  

Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55

Porsche Discussions About Porsche Automobiles (alt.autos.porsche)


Discuss Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 in the Porsche forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old   
RichAsianKid
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 04:16 PM







greek_philosophizer wrote:
Quote:
RichAsianKid wrote:
Which of the above is the best roadster? What do people think?



If you really are rich, just get all three and save yourself the effort
of deciding.

.
Good point!

Actually it's not as unrealistic as you think - even for non-rich guys:
afterall don't forget that in America these cars are way cheaper
(anywhere up to 50% off, half price!) compared to the UK, Australia,
Europe, East Asia.....



Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old   
Filmophile
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 07:59 PM






Quote:
Shades of the 914-6. Cool car, but for not much more you can get a real
Porshe. (a 911).
Oh, please. Porsche has been building mid-engined cars for road and
track since the 1960s, most of them very succesful, at least as race
vehicles. The 914 was part Porsche, part Volkswagen, so many "purists"
claimed it wasn't a real Porsche (just like the 924). I can argue over
that, but I'm not going to waste the time. The point is that the
Boxster is just as much a "real" Porsche as has been any variant of the
911 - which isn't even a "real" 911 anymore if you ask the assholes who
think that the model must have an air-cooled engine to qualify.

I'll also point out that the four cylinder 914 vastly outsold the 911
during it's lifetime (as had the 912 before it) and that as much as I
love the 911, the Boxster would throw the 911 to the wind on track if
Porsche would stop dicking around with the engine lineup and start
putting the full blown 911 engine into the Boxster.

I'm willing to bet that either Porsche is going to go to 8-cylinder
power for the next 911, or they're going to break down and finally
admit that the model has probably gotten as good as it's ever going to
get - 52 years ain't a bad lifespan folks.



Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old   
dizzy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 09:30 PM



Filmophile wrote:

Quote:
This month's issue of Car and Driver has a comparison of the M Coupe'
and the Cayman S, the Cayman was quicker in all but one accleration
test and was 2 seconds quicker around the test track. C&D gave it the
win because of it's superior performance and dynamics.
I'd love to get a Cayman. Too bad it's out of my league,
money-wise... 8(



Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old   
dizzy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 09:32 PM



Richard Sexton wrote:

Quote:
In article <J3%rg.10587$Nv.8919@fed1read10>,
Lawrence Lugar <lawrence_lugar (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote:
the mercedes is a sissy status-seeking sport's car,

The 6's were. The 55 will out-evrything the Prosche.
Oh? How's the manual gearbox?



Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old   
RichAsianKid
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 09:38 PM




Filmophile wrote:
Quote:
A. There won't be an SLK63 for two reasons:
1. The SLK can't take that engine (it's to heavy anyhow)
2. MB is trying to give people a reason to spend more cash on the
CLK model

B. The only time the SLK55 has ever taken favor over the Boxster was in
that sill Top Gear comparison. Overall, the Boxster is considered the
shining star in it's class and the the new engine lineup and suspension
tweks that are coming for '07 are only going to help. I'll refer all to
the following for final words:
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...-cayman-s.html
Ouch! That's last paragraph's harsh!

Quote:
Keep in mind the 2007 Boxster S is effectively a Cayman S minus the
hard roofline.
Off topic, but some (ahem, obviously biased) stats from 2003:
http://www.sandsmuseum.com/cars/elis...getagrip2.html



Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old   
Jim Keenan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 11:45 PM




"Filmophile" <Filmophilia (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
I'm willing to bet that either Porsche is going to go to 8-cylinder
power for the next 911, or they're going to break down and finally
admit that the model has probably gotten as good as it's ever going to
get - 52 years ain't a bad lifespan folks.
I think you'll see it with an 8, but I doubt they'll discontinue it.




Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old   
Filmophile
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 11:48 PM



Quote:
The 914-6 was may favorite Porsche ever, frankly, being a sucker for
mid engined card. My understanding is the 914 was a VW and sold in
Europe as such but that the 914-6 was built by Porsche.
Porsche and VW designed the chassis and body togethor, 914/4 models got
VW engines, transmissions and suspensions - 914/6 models got a de-tuned
911 motor, gearbox and suspension. In Europe, 914/4 models were sold as
VWs while Porsche sold the 6s under their own badge. Marketing B.S.
made them sell both versions as Porsches here in the states.

Quote:
But this has nothing to do with "what's a real porsche" just the
simple economics of the day when for $3K more you could have a 911.
The price difference between the 914/4 and the 911 may have been bigger
than that. Also, keep in mind that in 1974 you could still buy a
domestic sedan for $3,000 dollars, it wasn't a small amount of money at
the time.

Quote:
Uh huh. And if pigs had wings they could fly. 911's still dominate
racing. Call me if that ever changes.
First of all, please read the part where I made a point of Porsche's
habit of giving the Boxster line less powerful engines than the 911
line - this is done intentionally to ensure that the 911 goes
unthreatened. If they planted a 360 Hp 911 motor into a Cayman and gave
it slight suspension tweaks it'd blow the doors off a 997 S. The Cayman
S is already as auick to 60 as the 996 was and it's about as fast as a
base 997 around the Nurburgring.

Secondly, Porsche has never developed a race prepped version of the
Boxster, nor have they ever entered it into competition, nor will they
ever because it's a convertible. However, if they built a Cayman GT3 it
would dominate in-class and would essentially end 911 sales except to
hardcore enthusiasts. Can you imagine a Cayman with the new 400 Hp GT3
motor? Giving that car a race-ready suspension and a 105 Hp boost in
power would make it a monster.



Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old   
Jim Keenan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-11-2006 , 11:59 PM




"Dori A Schmetterling" <ng (AT) nospam (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
Journalists' opinion is that Boxster drivers have it as a consolation
prize as they would rather be driving a 911...

;-)
DAS
Really? What journalists?

The Boxster's mid-engine configuration is generally considered to offer
better handling characteristics than the rear-engine of the 911 (and I have
a 2002 Carrera) since the weight distribution is more equal. While it has
been largely engineered out of the 911, the car will still exhibit trailing
throttle oversteer if you get into a corner at 11/10ths and lift. If you
know what to do at the limit the Carrera is a formidable handler, but the
natural reaction of most drivers in this case is exactly wrong.

I had a Boxster as a loaner while the Carrera got tires, and the car is a
wonderful handling car. Not as fast as my Carrera, but a very nice ride and
hardly a consolation prize. Anybody who tells you so is just kidding
themself.




Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old   
Jim Keenan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-12-2006 , 12:01 AM




"Richard Sexton" <richard (AT) news (DOT) vrx.net> wrote

Quote:
In article <NtmdnagcmPqAwy7ZRVnytQ (AT) pipex (DOT) net>,
Dori A Schmetterling <ng (AT) nospam (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
Journalists' opinion is that Boxster drivers have it as a consolation
prize
as they would rather be driving a 911...

Shades of the 914-6. Cool car, but for not much more you can get a real
Porshe. (a 911).
Right. That's like saying the only real Mercedes has gull wing doors.




Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old   
Jim Keenan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Z4 M vs Boxster S vs SLK 55 - 07-12-2006 , 12:13 AM




"Richard Sexton" <richard (AT) news (DOT) vrx.net> wrote

Quote:
In article <J3%rg.10587$Nv.8919@fed1read10>,
Lawrence Lugar <lawrence_lugar (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote:
the mercedes is a sissy status-seeking sport's car,

The 6's were. The 55 will out-evrything the Prosche.
The only areas MB outdoes Porsche is on the JD Power Initial Quality and
Reliability surveys, where Porsche leads or is near the top of the list on
both, while MB languishes well below the industry average - MB just racks up
so many more black marks. Hell, Ford and Chevrolet are doing better than MB.




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.