![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
If you're an AOL user and you think this really stinks, use keyword "Tell Us" and let those bastards hear from you. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm seriously considering doing that, although I don't want to lose my e-mail address. I've had the same one for 10 years. The way AOL did newsgroups was one of the main reasons I stayed with them. Although AOL's really not that bad once you beat it into shape. I just went to DSL from dialup so I have an alternative, but I'm not sure that BellSouth is an improvement. Everytime I go to the BellSouth startup page (now replaced with Google Groups) it tried to install spyware on my computer (prevented by Spybot Search and Destroy). And a forum on BellSouth DSL has a lot of complaints about BellSouth and newsgroups. I really don't like the way Google Groups works. I can't tell what I've read or not. |
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
I'm seriously considering doing that, although I don't want to lose my e-mail address. I've had the same one for 10 years. |
|
I just went to DSL from dialup so I have an alternative, but I'm not sure that BellSouth is an improvement. Everytime I go to the BellSouth startup page (now replaced with Google Groups) it tried to install spyware on my computer (prevented by Spybot Search and Destroy). |
|
And a forum on BellSouth DSL has a lot of complaints about BellSouth and newsgroups. |
|
I really don't like the way Google Groups works. I can't tell what I've read or not. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
I really don't like the way Google Groups works. I can't tell what I've read or not. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"laurak" <laurak (AT) madmousergraphics (DOT) com> writes: I really don't like the way Google Groups works. I can't tell what I've read or not. Use a normal Unix shell account and run something like 'nn' to read newsgroups. Does auto-management of what's been read and what hasn't. No lame graphical interface to contend with. Newsgroups are after all meant to be a simple, text-based medium. Craig. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
"laurak" <laurak (AT) madmousergraphics (DOT) com> writes: I really don't like the way Google Groups works. I can't tell what I've read or not. Use a normal Unix shell account and run something like 'nn' to read newsgroups. Does auto-management of what's been read and what hasn't. No lame graphical interface to contend with. Newsgroups are after all meant to be a simple, text-based medium. Craig. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
| Craig's C900 Site wrote: "laurak" <laurak (AT) madmousergraphics (DOT) com> writes: I really don't like the way Google Groups works. I can't tell what I've read or not. Use a normal Unix shell account and run something like 'nn' to read newsgroups. Does auto-management of what's been read and what hasn't. No lame graphical interface to contend with. Newsgroups are after all meant to be a simple, text-based medium. Craig. Groups.Google was once my only news source my the ISP at the time dropped the news server. But Groups.Google had a slow turnaround for updating, sometimes up to 24 hours. Good for reference though since all posts are kept. Another problem: If someone changes the subject line, the thread becomes disconnected as a separate thread is created. My advice in general is therefore never to change the subject line. Likewise, top postings are cumbersome to read in Google whereas bottom postings comes out more naturally when you scroll down an entire thread. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |