AutosTalk Forums  

Average Turbo Engine life

Saab Saab Automobiles Discussions (alt.autos.saab)


Discuss Average Turbo Engine life in the Saab forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Simo Melenius
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-25-2004 , 05:21 AM






Dave Hinz <DaveHinz (AT) spamcop (DOT) net> writes:

Quote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:56:00 GMT, Interested in Saab <particularistElevenIDONTLIKESPAM (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
How long does a turbo engine last, in terms of milage? Many
hundreds of thousands of miles isn't unusual:
http://www.saabnet.com/tsn/faq/miles/All.html
How do the NG and later engines compare to the classic ones?

I know from experience that the classic four-cylinder Saab engines
have very few problems, usually none. It's been my understanding that
the engine design and manufacturer has varied since the classic Saabs,
and I have an unverified yokelish suspicion that the new ones probably
won't match the old quality. If I recall correctly, some models don't
even have Saab's own engines -- please tell me I'm wrong :-)


br,
S

--
(format nil "~{~A~}"
(quote ( s i m o #\ m e l e n i u s #\ < s m e @ i k i #\. f i > )))


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Henrik B.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-25-2004 , 05:51 AM







"Simo Melenius" <firstname.lastname (AT) iki (DOT) fi-spam> skrev i en meddelelse
news:87acubtaos.fsf (AT) sme (DOT) intra.citec.fi...

Quote:
http://www.saabnet.com/tsn/faq/miles/All.html

How do the NG and later engines compare to the classic ones?

I know from experience that the classic four-cylinder Saab engines
have very few problems, usually none. It's been my understanding that
the engine design and manufacturer has varied since the classic Saabs,
and I have an unverified yokelish suspicion that the new ones probably
won't match the old quality. If I recall correctly, some models don't
even have Saab's own engines -- please tell me I'm wrong :-)
If you buy a Saab up until today, you'll get a real Saab 4-cyl. It's first
from the 9-3SS, that it's a co-developed 2-litre engine. Before that, both
the 2,0 and the 2,3 is Saab's own engine. In my opinion, the 2,3 is the best
engine Saab has ever built.

Cheers!




Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Johannes H Andersen
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-25-2004 , 06:14 AM





"Henrik B." wrote:
Quote:
[...]

If you buy a Saab up until today, you'll get a real Saab 4-cyl. It's first
from the 9-3SS, that it's a co-developed 2-litre engine. Before that, both
the 2,0 and the 2,3 is Saab's own engine. In my opinion, the 2,3 is the best
engine Saab has ever built.
IMO the 2.0 B202 is the best engine.

The 2.3 needed balancer shafts, the 2.0 didn't need them, but got them because
of marketing considerations. The 2.0 is equally massive and strong.


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Henrik B.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-25-2004 , 06:51 AM




"Johannes H Andersen" <johs (AT) sizefitter (DOT) com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:417CD21C.E22B523F (AT) sizefitter (DOT) com...

Quote:
the 2,0 and the 2,3 is Saab's own engine. In my opinion, the 2,3 is the
best
engine Saab has ever built.

IMO the 2.0 B202 is the best engine.

The 2.3 needed balancer shafts, the 2.0 didn't need them, but got them
because
of marketing considerations. The 2.0 is equally massive and strong.
I'm talking overall - durability, performance, noise, fuelconsumption a.s.o.

Cheers!




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Johannes H Andersen
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-25-2004 , 07:05 AM





"Henrik B." wrote:
Quote:
"Johannes H Andersen" <johs (AT) sizefitter (DOT) com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:417CD21C.E22B523F (AT) sizefitter (DOT) com...

the 2,0 and the 2,3 is Saab's own engine. In my opinion, the 2,3 is the
best
engine Saab has ever built.

IMO the 2.0 B202 is the best engine.

The 2.3 needed balancer shafts, the 2.0 didn't need them, but got them
because
of marketing considerations. The 2.0 is equally massive and strong.

I'm talking overall - durability, performance, noise, fuelconsumption a.s.o.

Cheers!
It really depends on what you want, hence two engine sizes or differences
in stroke. Otherwise, the differences are the same... The 2.3 is the main
engine in the US market since they expect larger engines and normally run
automatics. I disagree that there is any difference in durability and
noise.


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Dave Hinz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-25-2004 , 09:48 AM



On 22 Oct 2004 18:35:08 -0700, R. Frist <frist (AT) wvnet (DOT) edu> wrote:

Quote:
Regarding the rusted lug nuts, Saab lug nuts are notorious for rust.
They are? I didn't know that, and I've been driving them for a very
long time. Haven't noticed any particular problem other than that they're
made of steel.

Quote:
I did learn the other day from our lacal Saab tech that there is a
recall on 9-5s and maybe 9-3s regarding rusting of lug nuts on certain
types of wheels.
Um, no. The recall you're thinking of is for a new design of lug _bolts_,
for people who switch between alloy rims and steel rims (as in winter tires).
The rust related to this recall is rust on the hubs, which if ignored could
cause the wheel not to seat properly, putting undue stresses on the lug bolts.

Quote:
If the wheels meet the criteria theyh will replace
them for free.
I know that applies to the 9-5, not sure about the 9-3's lug bolts. The
replacement is a 2-piece arrangement.

Dave Hinz



Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
AT
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-26-2004 , 09:08 AM



Quote:
While following this advice will not hurt anything, it really is based on
old procedures from before the turbos were water cooled. Nowadays, it is OK
to shutdown a modern SAAB turbo engine once you have parked the car. Reving
any engine just before shutdown is a bad idea.

-Fred W
With the classic Saabs one was supposed to wait 20 seconds or more for
the bearing to cool. With any turbo one should give it time to wind
down before you shut off the the oil supply. Granted, the turbo
usually will wind down in the time it takes to park but I still think
one should make a conscious effort to not shut down immediately.


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Al
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Average Turbo Engine life - 10-26-2004 , 04:29 PM




"R. Frist" <frist (AT) wvnet (DOT) edu> wrote

Quote:
While following this advice will not hurt anything, it really is based on
old procedures from before the turbos were water cooled. Nowadays, it is
OK
to shutdown a modern SAAB turbo engine once you have parked the car.
Reving
any engine just before shutdown is a bad idea.

-Fred W

With the classic Saabs one was supposed to wait 20 seconds or more for
the bearing to cool. With any turbo one should give it time to wind
down before you shut off the the oil supply. Granted, the turbo
usually will wind down in the time it takes to park but I still think
one should make a conscious effort to not shut down immediately.
I agree, it can only do good, particularly after a "dash home to pick the
kids up in time" type of run! (Clearly once they're on board, dashing
anywhere is simply not on the agenda)


Lets face it; it takes 30 seconds to apply the handbrake, put it in
neutral/park,take off your seatbelt and remove the facia from the horrid non
original equipment stereo many of us have fitted. Why not leave actually
turning the engine off till then?

Al





Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.