Just my impressions

#21

"Elder" <carl.robson (AT) bouncing-czechs (DOT) com> wrote

In article <45715a4b$0$2434$db0fefd9 (AT) news (DOT) zen.co.uk>,
thedervman (AT) gmail (DOT) com says...

Quote:

"Junkyard Engineer" <jevandenbroucke (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:hKLbh.15000$ed6.677580 (AT) weber (DOT) videotron.net...
I had to let my 9-3 '06 Aero Sport combi (25,000 Km) for a checkup at the
dealer and they gave me a 9-5 '06 2.3T, 2,400 Km, so pretty new.

Just my impressions but I just hate that car compare to mine. The inside
layout is terrible, the motor seems to lack something

Two cylinders?
Since when did a new Saab have a twin cylinder engine. All they have

ever needed was 4 and a turbo to go quick. Although 3 and a bottle of 2
stroke oil came close.

*****

Two cylinders is what the 2.3 is lacking..?

--
The DervMan
www.dervman.com

#22

On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:48:29 -0000, Elder <carl.robson (AT) bouncing-czechs (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

In article <45715a4b$0$2434$db0fefd9 (AT) news (DOT) zen.co.uk>,
thedervman (AT) gmail (DOT) com says...

Two cylinders?

Since when did a new Saab have a twin cylinder engine.

1949-1956, actually. The Saab 92, with an output of 25 BHP.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_92

....not to be confused with the Saab 91 "Safir", which had a 180 BHP 4cyl
engine and was somewhat faster and more manouverable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_91

Quote:

All they have
ever needed was 4 and a turbo to go quick. Although 3 and a bottle of 2
stroke oil came close.

In all honesty, my 3-cyl 96 two stroke Sab is more fun, especially in
the snow, than anything newer. Including the 99 turbo.

Dave Hinz

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Just my impressions

Saab Saab Automobiles Discussions (alt.autos.saab)

Re: Just my impressions - 12-03-2006 , 01:04 PM

Re: Just my impressions - 12-03-2006 , 01:13 PM