![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#71
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:45:27 +0200, "Richard" <root@localhost> wrote: Dave, yes... but you sometimes tend to do the same... ![]() No $hit. Also, he's never satisfied with the way anyone "reads" what he writes - it looks like English but apparently it's some mysterious alter-version where only Dave knows the true meaning. Yeah, almost like I want people to back up with evidence when it's clear |
#72
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:45:27 +0200, Richard <root@localhost> wrote: "Dave Hinz" <DaveHinz (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:59a9qjF2jruojU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net... On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:09:32 +0200, Richard <root@localhost> wrote: Gary, first of all: You completely mis-interpret my words, and take them to mean something they do not say. You noticed that too, did you? Dave, yes... but you sometimes tend to do the same... ![]() At least I don't nym-shift. What's YOUR excuse there, sparky? |
#73
| |||
| |||
|
|
first of all: You completely mis-interpret my words, and take them to mean something they do not say. |
|
I have put the numbers from that page in a spreadsheet and made some nice graph of it. I want you to see it. |
#74
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 20 Apr 2007 02:44:14 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinz (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: I was hoping for unbiased sources. Obviously you are incapable of providing same. Wrong conclusion. Once again, I invite you to do your own research. At least you're nearing self-awareness. Let me guess - I've plonked you before and you've nym-shifted yet again, right? Aside from the fact that "plonking" is a habit of the truly lame, you're even lamer - because you claim to plonk people and never do. Let me repeat: what happened in the 70's is irrelevant. What is today, is. Riiiiight. So. One last try there sparky. Why should I believe this batch of idiots more than the batch of idiots 20 years ago? They both seem to have the same basic ideas, but with opposite results. What's the real deal, and why? Hint: if you respond with abuse, that weakens your credibility. Just so you know. Let me try one more time: what people said 20 years ago has no bearing on the scientific realities today. Continually claiming that it does really makes you look very foolish. |
#75
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 2 May 2007 01:11:40 -0400, "John" <john (AT) myhmg (DOT) org> wrote: Exposed: The Climate of Fear - Wednesday, May 2nd The Other Side of the Global Warming Debate CNN Headline News Channel http://www.glennbeck.com/tv/index.shtml Now there's an unbiased source. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |