AutosTalk Forums  

Any Thoughts on the new Outlook?

Saturn cars All about Saturn cars, fans and company. (rec.autos.makers.saturn)


Discuss Any Thoughts on the new Outlook? in the Saturn cars forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Joe
 
Posts: n/a

Default Any Thoughts on the new Outlook? - 04-30-2008 , 07:17 PM






Wife is itching for a new kiddie-carrier... Considering it... But would
love to know all I can about it's weaknesses first.

Joe in Northern, NJ - V#8013-R

Currently Riding The "Mother Ship"
http://yunx.com/valk.htm

Ride a motorcycle in or near NJ?
http://tinyurl.com/hmzj
http://tinyurl.com/5apkg




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Steph
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Any Thoughts on the new Outlook? - 04-30-2008 , 08:38 PM






"Joe" <really-faked-but-works (AT) yunx (DOT) com> wrote in
news:E67Sj.6184$WS1.1762@trndny04:

Quote:
Wife is itching for a new kiddie-carrier... Considering it... But
would love to know all I can about it's weaknesses first.

Joe in Northern, NJ - V#8013-R

Currently Riding The "Mother Ship"
http://yunx.com/valk.htm

Joe, I have been itching over the Outlook for awhile too.
I drove one about two weeks back - big , heavy, roomy, good power.
It does shift kinda hard and early when accelerating.

The 7/8 passenger seating is nice.
The 4500 tow rating is nice.
The 235 hp is nice.

The EPA estimates... not nice.
Also not nice, once you deck it out you are talking $40k !

I am collecting info on lots of other 7/8 passenger vehicles with tow
ratings above 4000 lbs - but EPA estimates of 20 city and 25 hwy or
better. I'd love to go hybrid, but it isn't there yet - they are doing
the BIG SUV's first, then maybe the Crossovers.



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
marx404
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Any Thoughts on the new Outlook? - 04-30-2008 , 08:45 PM



All I know is that the first generations (2007) had a shifting paradigm
issue which was resolved by a software update. 2008 Outlooks have this
already fixed. 24mpg hwy in a SUV with 275hp isn't too bad. The shifting on
the new V6's is something new for people used to dino-guzzling V8's, instead
of being tossed back into the seat, the V6 is very smooth.

check out www.cars.com and MSN Autos as well to compare and read all about
them.

--
marx404

_________________
"Joe" <really-faked-but-works (AT) yunx (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Wife is itching for a new kiddie-carrier... Considering it... But would
love to know all I can about it's weaknesses first.

Joe in Northern, NJ - V#8013-R

Currently Riding The "Mother Ship"
http://yunx.com/valk.htm

Ride a motorcycle in or near NJ?
http://tinyurl.com/hmzj
http://tinyurl.com/5apkg






Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
SMS
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Any Thoughts on the new Outlook? - 05-01-2008 , 09:19 PM



PerfectReign wrote:
Quote:
Joe turned on the Etch-A-Sketch and wrote:

Wife is itching for a new kiddie-carrier... Considering it... But would
love to know all I can about it's weaknesses first.


I looked at them and stayed the <insert explicitive here> away.

1. They're the same size as a Tahoe (roughly) yet don't have the power.
202"x79"x76", 5200 lbs for the Tahoe and 200"x78"x69", 4500 lbs for the
Outlook. 295hp/305 ft-lbs for the Tahoe and 275hp/251 ft-lbs for the
Outlook.

2. They don't get much better mileage - 14/19 for the tahoe and 16/24 for
the outlook.
Hmm, the highway mileage is 21% better on the Outlook. That's a fairly
significant difference.

Quote:
3. They cost about the same.
If the Saturn dealer is actually sticking to MSRP, which I doubt, then
the Tahoe will have a lower street price.

Quote:
4. They are front-wheel drive and have no locking differential.
No one is taking the Outlook off-road, so I question the need for a
locking or LS differential. It's like taking a Honda CR-V off road. The
AWD is good for one thing, and that's satisfying the legal requirement
to not put on chains when the CHP requires chains for non-AWD vehicles.

Quote:
Your money is better spent with a Tahoe/Yukon.
Yes, if you need a true SUV, rather than an MTV (Mall Terrain Vehicle).


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
SMS
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What we learned from the Saturn Vue purchase - 05-02-2008 , 02:14 PM



RepublicansDestroyAmerica (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

Quote:
Watch out for dealers that add junk fees like "closing fees" of $199
(a relative ran into this in South Carolina, and wen to another dealer
that didn't have this nonsense). Why don't they just call it
"additional dealer markup" since that's what its (because Saturn won't
let them because of the myth of MSRP). They even mention this fee on
their web site ("http://www.saturnofflorence.com/"):

"This dealership charges a closing fee of $199.00, which is allowed by
SC Code Section 37-2-307. It is a charge that is permitted by law but
not required by law. The full cash price charged at any dealership
depends on many factors, including all products and services bought
wit <sic> the vehicle."
I looked at that section of the South Carolina code. It's not closing
costs for a loan that it refers to,

"SECTION 37-2-307. Notice of closing fees on motor vehicle sales
contract; registration fees.

Every motor vehicle dealer charging closing fees on a motor vehicle
sales contract shall pay a one-time registration fee of ten dollars
during each state fiscal year to the Department of Consumer Affairs. The
closing fee must be included in the advertised price of the motor
vehicle, disclosed on the sales contract, and displayed in a conspicuous
location in the motor vehicle dealership."

It's a sleazy way of adding additional dealer mark-up to the vehicle
price, that especially benefits Saturn dealers because they aren't
allowed by Saturn to add additional dealer mark-up. I'd stay away from
this dealer just on principle, especially because the fee is so high. If
it was $30 or $40 it wouldn't be worth arguing about, but $199 is
outrageous, that's another 1% on a 19,900 car.


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
-Cronus-
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What we learned from the Saturn Vue purchase - 05-02-2008 , 04:17 PM



scharf.steven (AT) geemail (DOT) com & RepublicansDestroyAmerica (AT) gmail (DOT) com

Why are you replying to yourself.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
marx404
 
Posts: n/a

Default STOP TROLLING STEVEN - 05-02-2008 , 08:33 PM



<quote>It's a sleazy way of adding additional dealer mark-up to the vehicle
price, that especially benefits Saturn dealers because they aren't
allowed by Saturn to add additional dealer mark-up.I'd stay away from
this dealer just on principle, especially because the fee is so
high.</quote>

NO, it's called "disclosure". Most dealerships hit you with some kind of
closing fee or doc fee and will hide it when you get into the finance
office. This place simply posted it on the home page - right up front for
all to see. Again, most places won't even disclose that they have this fee
and will add it in without your knowledge. This is not the only dealership
that has this on their website, btw, nor is it the only dealership that
charges some kind of closing fee. If you don't believe that, then go shop
Chevy and see what happens. But that's not the real reason you are posting
these nasties and then replying back to yourself, is it?

Speaking of "principal" Please stop trolling, StevenDestroysSaturn (AT) jerk (DOT) com.

--
marx404



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.