AutosTalk Forums  

Bad Valves or Rings?

Subaru Subaru vehicles (alt.autos.subaru)


Discuss Bad Valves or Rings? in the Subaru forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
BobN
 
Posts: n/a

Default Bad Valves or Rings? - 05-08-2007 , 08:32 AM






A compression test traced the cause of the cyl. 2 misfire on my 98 Outback
EJ25 to bad compression in that cylinder - it read 25lbs vs. 155lbs for cyl.
4. Since I cannot see or smell any oil burning, is it reasonable to
conclude that the problem is therefore valve-related rather than bad rings?

It will be a lot easier for me to re-do the head than to rebuild the entire
engine, so perhaps this is just wishful thinking.

Your informed, serious comments are much appreciated.



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Bob's Backfire Burrito
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bad Valves or Rings? - 05-08-2007 , 08:41 AM







"BobN" <nobody (AT) here (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
A compression test traced the cause of the cyl. 2 misfire on my 98 Outback
EJ25 to bad compression in that cylinder - it read 25lbs vs. 155lbs for
cyl. 4. Since I cannot see or smell any oil burning, is it reasonable to
conclude that the problem is therefore valve-related rather than bad rings?

It will be a lot easier for me to re-do the head than to rebuild the
entire engine, so perhaps this is just wishful thinking.

Your informed, serious comments are much appreciated.

You need to do a "Leak Down" test. When you have pressure on the suspected
cylinder, listen by the oil filler, exhaust pipe and intake for flowing air.
Could be a burned exhaust valve...could be broken rings.....




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Dano58
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bad Valves or Rings? - 05-08-2007 , 08:44 AM



On May 8, 9:32 am, "BobN" <nob... (AT) here (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
A compression test traced the cause of the cyl. 2 misfire on my 98 Outback
EJ25 to bad compression in that cylinder - it read 25lbs vs. 155lbs for cyl.
4. Since I cannot see or smell any oil burning, is it reasonable to
conclude that the problem is therefore valve-related rather than bad rings?

It will be a lot easier for me to re-do the head than to rebuild the entire
engine, so perhaps this is just wishful thinking.

Your informed, serious comments are much appreciated.
I assume you did only a 'dry' compression test...? Their are 2 more
tests you can do to narrow it down - do a 'wet' compression test,
where you squirt some oil into the suspect cylinder and re-do the
compression test. If it reads higher, it's the rings. If the same or
lower, it's probably the valves. You can also have a leak-down test
done, where compressed air is squirted into the cylinder, and the
source of the leakage is traced. You probably would need to take the
car to a shop for that one.

Dan D
formerly '99 Legacy L 30th (son's)
Central NJ USA



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
johninKY
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bad Valves or Rings? - 05-09-2007 , 01:49 PM



Other possibilities are valves adjusted too tight and a leaking HG. HG
don't always leak between cylinders. But if I were a betting man, my
money is on a burnt exhaust valve.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Carl 1 Lucky Texan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bad Valves or Rings? - 05-09-2007 , 06:32 PM



Dano58 wrote:

Quote:
On May 8, 9:32 am, "BobN" <nob... (AT) here (DOT) com> wrote:

A compression test traced the cause of the cyl. 2 misfire on my 98 Outback
EJ25 to bad compression in that cylinder - it read 25lbs vs. 155lbs for cyl.
4. Since I cannot see or smell any oil burning, is it reasonable to
conclude that the problem is therefore valve-related rather than bad rings?

It will be a lot easier for me to re-do the head than to rebuild the entire
engine, so perhaps this is just wishful thinking.

Your informed, serious comments are much appreciated.


I assume you did only a 'dry' compression test...? Their are 2 more
tests you can do to narrow it down - do a 'wet' compression test,
where you squirt some oil into the suspect cylinder and re-do the
compression test. If it reads higher, it's the rings. If the same or
lower, it's probably the valves. You can also have a leak-down test
done, where compressed air is squirted into the cylinder, and the
source of the leakage is traced. You probably would need to take the
car to a shop for that one.

Dan D
formerly '99 Legacy L 30th (son's)
Central NJ USA

I've often wondered how effective this test would be on a horizontal engine.

Carl


--
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.