AutosTalk Forums  

To decent people in this group

Subaru Subaru vehicles (alt.autos.subaru)


Discuss To decent people in this group in the Subaru forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Rick Courtright
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: To decent people in this group - 12-30-2006 , 09:56 PM






Frank wrote:

Quote:
or is it from the "bad" Amanda
Hi,

The only "good" Amanda is a "gone" Amanda.

And as we've learned before, the ONLY way to have one of those is to
ignore her. She simply MUST have the last word, be it fair, or foul,
here, or in personal e-mails (yeah, she loves me, too!)

So how about we ALL start that course of action, IMMEDIATELY? And get
ready for a happy New Year instead of perpetuating this troll feeding
frenzy?

Rick


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Frank
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: To decent people in this group - 12-31-2006 , 08:27 AM







Rick Courtright wrote:
Quote:
Frank wrote:

or is it from the "bad" Amanda

Hi,

The only "good" Amanda is a "gone" Amanda.

And as we've learned before, the ONLY way to have one of those is to
ignore her. She simply MUST have the last word, be it fair, or foul,
here, or in personal e-mails (yeah, she loves me, too!)

So how about we ALL start that course of action, IMMEDIATELY? And get
ready for a happy New Year instead of perpetuating this troll feeding
frenzy?

Rick
Actually, I get a kick out of Amanda. She is not your normal troll in
that she comes back to dialog on responses. Her original question on
hybrids was good because a lot of car lines are moving in that
direction and maybe Subaru will follow.

OTOH, she is a wack job. Deterioration of the threads remind me of
something I read in Mad magazine years ago:

"When she is good, she is very, very good, but when she is bad she is
terrific."

Frank



Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
amanda
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: To decent people in this group - 12-31-2006 , 08:53 AM




Rick Courtright wrote:
Quote:
Frank wrote:

or is it from the "bad" Amanda

Hi,

The only "good" Amanda is a "gone" Amanda.

And as we've learned before, the ONLY way to have one of those is to
ignore her. She simply MUST have the last word, be it fair, or foul,
here, or in personal e-mails (yeah, she loves me, too!)

If pointing out to you by asking "Are you enjoying what you started" is
interepreted as "yes, she loves me too.", you people are pretty
hopeless. Reminds me of the holier-than-thou attitude of your that
someone has pointed out to you back then.




Quote:
So how about we ALL start that course of action, IMMEDIATELY? And get
ready for a happy New Year instead of perpetuating this troll feeding
frenzy?

Rick


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
amanda
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: To decent people in this group - 12-31-2006 , 08:56 AM




Frank wrote:
Quote:
Rick Courtright wrote:
Frank wrote:

or is it from the "bad" Amanda

Hi,

The only "good" Amanda is a "gone" Amanda.

And as we've learned before, the ONLY way to have one of those is to
ignore her. She simply MUST have the last word, be it fair, or foul,
here, or in personal e-mails (yeah, she loves me, too!)

So how about we ALL start that course of action, IMMEDIATELY? And get
ready for a happy New Year instead of perpetuating this troll feeding
frenzy?

Rick

Actually, I get a kick out of Amanda. She is not your normal troll in
that she comes back to dialog on responses. Her original question on
hybrids was good because a lot of car lines are moving in that
direction and maybe Subaru will follow.
Her proginalquestion needs not be responded by holier-than-thou Rick
with "She is backkkk!" did it?


Quote:
OTOH, she is a wack job. Deterioration of the threads remind me of
something I read in Mad magazine years ago:

"When she is good, she is very, very good, but when she is bad she is
terrific."
Old man, telling you to shut up is interpreted as anything other than
"shut up", you are more hopless. than I initially realized.


Quote:
Frank


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Vanguard
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: To decent people in this group - 01-04-2007 , 08:12 AM



"amanda" <amanda772009 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Vanguard wrote:
"amanda" <amanda772009 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1167447831.000603.162220 (AT) a3g2000cwd (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Please be aware that someone is low enough to post pretending me
using
extremely foul langauge.

So you're saying that you've been squeaky clean in your posts? Yeah,
right.

I didn't say that I was sqeaky clean but I wasn't foul. My response
was appropriate to his tone. If you don't like, too bad.
Which is the same attitude of the folks that you are complaining about.
So you're just like them. They used foul language and so did you. I
didn't really care to use some arbitrary guide in determining
"extremeness" to somehow separate you from them. They're nasty, you
were nasty. Welcome to Usenet.

Quote:
BTW, you must have too much time on your hand checking all the posts
named amanda.
Just because it might take you a long time doesn't mean it takes the
rest of us that long to Google for posts along with them being threaded.
You just don't like getting caught in a half-truth in that you were to
blame, too, and you don't like that you lost at the spitting contest (as
if there really is a winner to be had amongst spitting children).



Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
amanda
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: To decent people in this group - 01-04-2007 , 01:57 PM




Vanguard wrote:
Quote:
"amanda" <amanda772009 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1167530194.402781.241710 (AT) 73g2000cwn (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Vanguard wrote:
"amanda" <amanda772009 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1167447831.000603.162220 (AT) a3g2000cwd (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Please be aware that someone is low enough to post pretending me
using
extremely foul langauge.

So you're saying that you've been squeaky clean in your posts? Yeah,
right.

I didn't say that I was sqeaky clean but I wasn't foul. My response
was appropriate to his tone. If you don't like, too bad.

Which is the same attitude of the folks that you are complaining about.
So you're just like them. They used foul language and so did you.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA..

Quote:
I
didn't really care to use some arbitrary guide in determining
"extremeness" to somehow separate you from them. They're nasty, you
were nasty. Welcome to Usenet.


BTW, you must have too much time on your hand checking all the posts
named amanda.

Just because it might take you a long time doesn't mean it takes the
rest of us that long to Google for posts along with them being threaded.
I wa stalking about chekcing the ip address adn comparing which post
was form which address, and ehnce which amanda, etc. Duh..

Quote:
You just don't like getting caught in a half-truth in that you were to
blame, too.
Hey shit brain, Go back and check those posts in this ng
chronologically and see who started the antagonism before you come
preaching to me.

Quote:
and you don't like that you lost at the spitting contest (as
if there really is a winner to be had amongst spitting children).
I lost? Hilarious but what else should I expect from losers?



Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
nobody >
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: To decent people in this group - 01-04-2007 , 09:15 PM



Vanguard wrote:

Quote:
You're just so eager to prove yourself a liar. You weren't fooling
anyone with your first post in this thread. I start to wonder if Alan
Conner is somewhere in her family.

NOOoooooo.... Not the Usenet Beavis! Don't even mention that name or it
will come here and call us all trolls. It probably has some sure-fire
cure for head gaskets on 2.5s.


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.