![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
"dr.benway" <dr.benway (AT) ziplip (DOT) com> wrote in message news:4598ba1b$0$4932$4c368faf (AT) roadrunner (DOT) com... I put in a Bosch battery with 640CCa. It was virtually the same size.. "peter" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:ES1mh.502$Am5.253 (AT) trndny03 (DOT) .. The battery in my 2002 wrx is getting weak; the starter sometimes crank slow on cold mornings. I think I contributed to the battery's weakness by accidentally leaving the dome light on overnight once in a while. Anyway, I believe the battery is size "group 35". Has anyone managed to put a larger battery in the car with minimum or no modification? If so, what size battery? In case you wonder, larger one seems more cost effective. "CCA" or cold cranking amps DON'T MEAN SHIT!!!! Unless you are starting a BIG diesel in 0 degree weather it's a stupid rating. You want a battery with a large "Reserve" or "Amp-hour" rating. This means you can leave lights on, radio for a while and still start the engine. If the battery doesn't have that info on it DO NOT BUY IT! |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
"y_p_w" <y_p_w (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:VKjmh.6331$yx6.447 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net... Some people living in hot climates seem to prefer batteries that can be topped off, after the inevitable evaporation. One comment from someone in Florida was that a "maintenance- free" battery probably wouldn't last longer than 2 years due to evaporation. I thought the whole idea of maintenance free battery is that they somehow don't evaporate. Are you saying manufacturers could just seal their batteries and call them maintenance free? |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
"y_p_w" <y_p_w (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:VKjmh.6331$yx6.447 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net... Some people living in hot climates seem to prefer batteries that can be topped off, after the inevitable evaporation. One comment from someone in Florida was that a "maintenance- free" battery probably wouldn't last longer than 2 years due to evaporation. Are you saying manufacturers could just seal their batteries and call them maintenance free? |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
peter wrote: "y_p_w" <y_p_w (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:VKjmh.6331$yx6.447 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net... Some people living in hot climates seem to prefer batteries that can be topped off, after the inevitable evaporation. One comment from someone in Florida was that a "maintenance- free" battery probably wouldn't last longer than 2 years due to evaporation. Are you saying manufacturers could just seal their batteries and call them maintenance free? You got it. I plan to watch the acid levels in the oem battery religiously, top it off as needed and hope to get no fewer than 8 years of service out of it if I end up keeping the car that long. Changing tires every two years is okay by me, battery on the other hand should last forever if properly pampered. I think there is a section in the owners manual that calls for the battery fluid level check. So whoever skimps on that: it's their loss really. It's not like they haven't been informed by FHI. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
You got it. I plan to watch the acid levels in the oem battery religiously, top it off as needed and hope to get no fewer than 8 years of service out of it if I end up keeping the car that long. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
it and every time our tame mechanic tells me it's fine. So far he's > right. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |