![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
I just looked at a 2007 Outback (base 2.5L, manual, ~19.5k) to replace my recently deceased Ford and I liked it, both the storage space and the ride and handling. Since I am a newbie with both Subies and AWD I thought I would ask a few stupid questions. 1. Long-term reliability (I tend to keep my cars till they start falling apart and eat time and money). Reviews I saw define long-term as 3-5 years and give Outback and Legacy good grades. What about longer term: with normal, regular maintenance is there a good chance to have a low-hassle 10+years / 150k miles? I know that all things break, but would like to avoid models that tend to require fixes every few thousand miles. |
|
2. AWD (which for me is nice but not absolutely necessary -- I live in MA). Does it make maintenance or repairs (engine, transmission, CV joints, anything else) much more frequent or expensive? |
|
3. Outback I saw does not have metal frame around windows. Is this a source of problems (e.g. with glass breakage opening a well-frozen car after a sleet / snowstorm)? |
|
4. If there are other suggestions for reliable wagons with good storage space for ~20k or less, I would love to hear them (folks here are probably biased, but hey -- it does not hurt to ask). |
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
I just looked at a 2007 Outback (base 2.5L, manual, ~19.5k) to replace my recently deceased Ford and I liked it, both the storage space and the ride and handling. Since I am a newbie with both Subies and AWD I thought I would ask a few stupid questions. 1. Long-term reliability (I tend to keep my cars till they start falling apart and eat time and money). Reviews I saw define long-term as 3-5 years and give Outback and Legacy good grades. What about longer term: with normal, regular maintenance is there a good chance to have a low-hassle 10+years / 150k miles? I know that all things break, but would like to avoid models that tend to require fixes every few thousand miles. |
|
2. AWD (which for me is nice but not absolutely necessary -- I live in MA). Does it make maintenance or repairs (engine, transmission, CV joints, anything else) much more frequent or expensive? |
|
3. Outback I saw does not have metal frame around windows. Is this a source of problems (e.g. with glass breakage opening a well-frozen car after a sleet / snowstorm)? |
|
4. If there are other suggestions for reliable wagons with good storage space for ~20k or less, I would love to hear them (folks here are probably biased, but hey -- it does not hurt to ask). Any info is appreciated! -- Alex |
#4
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
I just looked at a 2007 Outback (base 2.5L, manual, ~19.5k) to replace my recently deceased Ford and I liked it, both the storage space and the ride and handling. Since I am a newbie with both Subies and AWD I thought I would ask a few stupid questions. |
|
1. Long-term reliability (I tend to keep my cars till they start falling apart and eat time and money). Reviews I saw define long-term as 3-5 years and give Outback and Legacy good grades. What about longer term: with normal, regular maintenance is there a good chance to have a low-hassle 10+years / 150k miles? I know that all things break, but would like to avoid models that tend to require fixes every few thousand miles. |
|
2. AWD (which for me is nice but not absolutely necessary -- I live in MA). Does it make maintenance or repairs (engine, transmission, CV joints, anything else) much more frequent or expensive? |
|
3. Outback I saw does not have metal frame around windows. Is this a source of problems (e.g. with glass breakage opening a well-frozen car after a sleet / snowstorm)? |
|
4. If there are other suggestions for reliable wagons with good storage space for ~20k or less, I would love to hear them (folks here are probably biased, but hey -- it does not hurt to ask). I was looking this spring for a smaller wagon or small SUV. Looked at |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |