AutosTalk Forums  

Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan?

Subaru Subaru vehicles (alt.autos.subaru)


Discuss Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan? in the Subaru forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B
 
Posts: n/a

Default Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan? - 10-23-2009 , 08:33 PM






So, just for laughs I removed the mechanical fan from my Sube GL (89 Coupe)
Ambient temp today was about 52 degrees, normal for this time of year.
Temperature ran warm until the thermostat opened, and then...ran
absolutely normal.

However, the low end grunt from the engine was better, throttle response
was better, and the car just seemed to run easier without it.

Hmmm...

The electric fan is still installed and when last tested 2 months ago was
working perfectly.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Ashton Crusher
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan? - 10-24-2009 , 02:14 AM






On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:33:07 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS>
wrote:

Quote:
So, just for laughs I removed the mechanical fan from my Sube GL (89 Coupe)
Ambient temp today was about 52 degrees, normal for this time of year.
Temperature ran warm until the thermostat opened, and then...ran
absolutely normal.

However, the low end grunt from the engine was better, throttle response
was better, and the car just seemed to run easier without it.

Hmmm...

The electric fan is still installed and when last tested 2 months ago was
working perfectly.


Yeah, at 52 Degrees it's probably ok. They have to design the vehicle
for places that will get up to 115 degrees.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Don Stauffer
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan? - 10-24-2009 , 10:42 AM



Hachiroku ハチ*ク wrote:
Quote:
So, just for laughs I removed the mechanical fan from my Sube GL (89 Coupe)
Ambient temp today was about 52 degrees, normal for this time of year.
Temperature ran warm until the thermostat opened, and then...ran
absolutely normal.

However, the low end grunt from the engine was better, throttle response
was better, and the car just seemed to run easier without it.

Hmmm...

The electric fan is still installed and when last tested 2 months ago was
working perfectly.


Most racing cars do not use fans. Of course, they are not called upon
to idle very long.

Fans really get called into play for long periods of idle, or in very
slow driving traffic. In fact, I have seen cars in days of mechanical
fans that had a limit on how long they would idle in warm weather
without overheating.

I used to work in a gas station when I was a teenager, and one of my
jobs was responding to folks who had locked themselves out of car.
You'd be surprised how many did so with engine running! In most cases,
by time I got there the car was overheating. This was in fifties.

The regular simple belt driven fan was replaced in some cars by the
clutched fan that would freewheel above a certain engine speed, so it
could be turned with a better ratio at idle. Of course, when they went
to transverse engines the electric fan with thermostat came along.

In the hot rod era of fifties and sixties the clutched fan was very
popular, but many just took the simple route (cheap) and removed fan.
Had to avoid more than a couple of minutes of idle, of course.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Nate Nagel
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan? - 10-24-2009 , 12:48 PM



Don Stauffer wrote:
Quote:
Hachiroku ハチ*ク wrote:
So, just for laughs I removed the mechanical fan from my Sube GL (89
Coupe)
Ambient temp today was about 52 degrees, normal for this time of year.
Temperature ran warm until the thermostat opened, and then...ran
absolutely normal.

However, the low end grunt from the engine was better, throttle response
was better, and the car just seemed to run easier without it.

Hmmm...

The electric fan is still installed and when last tested 2 months ago was
working perfectly.

Most racing cars do not use fans. Of course, they are not called upon
to idle very long.

Fans really get called into play for long periods of idle, or in very
slow driving traffic. In fact, I have seen cars in days of mechanical
fans that had a limit on how long they would idle in warm weather
without overheating.

I used to work in a gas station when I was a teenager, and one of my
jobs was responding to folks who had locked themselves out of car. You'd
be surprised how many did so with engine running! In most cases, by
time I got there the car was overheating. This was in fifties.

The regular simple belt driven fan was replaced in some cars by the
clutched fan that would freewheel above a certain engine speed, so it
could be turned with a better ratio at idle. Of course, when they went
to transverse engines the electric fan with thermostat came along.

In the hot rod era of fifties and sixties the clutched fan was very
popular, but many just took the simple route (cheap) and removed fan.
Had to avoid more than a couple of minutes of idle, of course.
The nice thing about clutch fans is that they can be made to tighten up
when the engine gets hot.

Unfortunately, the thermostatic style are not available anymore for old
Studebakers (nose of the water pump is very large compared to a typical
GM engine, so you can't just use someone else's) so I personally am
stuck with the type you describe that just limit the max speed of the
fan, which makes for a noisier and less efficient drivetrain.

I see a lot of hot rodder types removing the engine fan completely and
using an electric, but I'm not completely sold on the idea that the
electrics can move enough air for a 300+ HP engine, especially when
using a radiator that was designed for a lower output engine.

I do know that some cars, e.g. a Porsche 944, actually require some sort
of fan (although that car does use an electric fan only) due to the
aerodynamics of the car; it doesn't naturally draw enough air through
the radiator even at highway speeds to keep the engine cool in warm weather.

nate

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
fred
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan? - 10-24-2009 , 07:51 PM



Nate Nagel <njnagel (AT) roosters (DOT) net> wrote in
news:hbvb4a02qup (AT) news4 (DOT) newsguy.com:

Quote:
Don Stauffer wrote:
Hachiroku ハチ*ク wrote:
So, just for laughs I removed the mechanical fan from my Sube GL (89

I do know that some cars, e.g. a Porsche 944, actually require some sort
of fan (although that car does use an electric fan only) due to the
aerodynamics of the car; it doesn't naturally draw enough air through
the radiator even at highway speeds to keep the engine cool in warm
weather.

Yes, the classic example of this is the 917 racing car. Great laugh the
first time you see it and know what it is.
Due to the twin 911 engines stuck together of course.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminal experiment #3762...who needs a fan? - 10-25-2009 , 05:29 PM



Quote:
It's been tried - there's not enough meat on a Ch*vy clutch fan to bore
it without making it dangerously thin; I don't have *any* extra space
for a spacer as I am pretty much throwing parts that were never intended
to work together at this car - right now it's a '55 coupe with a '63 R1
engine and a fan from some year GTO on a repro Stude clutch. =A0Clearance
between fan and shroud is almost nonexistent; you have to be real
careful reinstalling the shroud or the fan will hit when you shift or bra=
ke.
That's bad. I would have recommended one of the BMW clutches, which you
could probably machine an adaptor for. But they are just naturally pretty
deep. No way you can move that radiator forward a touch?
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.