![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
A friend just bought a '04 WRX with manual box. Great fun to drive and very pretty in its blue color. One option he had to take (already on the car) was a $100+ optional "titanium" shift knob with "sti" on it. It is a really small shift knob that does not "fall readily to hand" as the Brits used to say. I drove the car and the knob does not have a pleasant feel at all. Too small and too weirdly shaped. Almost a cylinder. The added cost seems really excessive, too. Was the dealer doing a snow job or is that little knob really that expensive? -- - GRL "It's good to want things." Steve Barr (philosopher, poet, humorist, chemist, Visual Basic programmer) |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Titanium has a very poor thermal conductivity and low density. It shouldn't feel that much different than walnut(which will probably have a urethane coating on it anyway). A VERY poor choice for a shift knob would be aluminum. Of course, the SHAPE could be a big problem on comfort. Still, get what you like. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
It's definitely outrageously priced from the dealer or most online vendors - eBay is a better venue to pick one up - I got mine for $40 - still a bit spendy, but better than the alternative! Shift knobs are sort of a personal thing - I like my STi one alot, but then I rarely have more than a couple of fingers on the shifter when shifting, and prefer a smaller knob - I actually really like the carbon fiber one, but at $175, that's not going to happen (haven't found a used one anywhere...) - in terms of temperature, I haven't had any problems with it - and I am in NM where we get more than a little sun - maybe if I held it longer it would feel hot... if you do shop on eBay for one - there are a couple of vendors pushing powdercoated aluminum knock-offs, so pay attention to what you are bidding on! |

|
"GRL" <GLitwinski (AT) CHARTERMI (DOT) COM> wrote in message news:viqgh8bga53n5e (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com... A friend just bought a '04 WRX with manual box. Great fun to drive and very pretty in its blue color. One option he had to take (already on the car) was a $100+ optional "titanium" shift knob with "sti" on it. It is a really small shift knob that does not "fall readily to hand" as the Brits used to say. I drove the car and the knob does not have a pleasant feel at all. Too small and too weirdly shaped. Almost a cylinder. The added cost seems really excessive, too. Was the dealer doing a snow job or is that little knob really that expensive? -- - GRL "It's good to want things." Steve Barr (philosopher, poet, humorist, chemist, Visual Basic programmer) |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
A friend just bought a '04 WRX with manual box. Great fun to drive and very pretty in its blue color. One option he had to take (already on the car) was a $100+ optional "titanium" shift knob with "sti" on it. It is a really small shift knob that does not "fall readily to hand" as the Brits used to say. I drove the car and the knob does not have a pleasant feel at all. Too small and too weirdly shaped. Almost a cylinder. The added cost seems really excessive, too. Was the dealer doing a snow job or is that little knob really that expensive? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
btw, it's SUPPOSED to be a piston. when you look at it again, you'll suddenly see it. i know i did. now, as to why someone would want to grab a piston shape, ya got me. maybe they should make them in the shape of tits. ken |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 03:19:29 GMT, Carl 1 Lucky Texan alckytxn (AT) swbell (DOT) not> wrote: Titanium has a very poor thermal conductivity and low density. It shouldn't feel that much different than walnut(which will probably have a urethane coating on it anyway). A VERY poor choice for a shift knob would be aluminum. Of course, the SHAPE could be a big problem on comfort. Still, get what you like. Perhaps compared to aluminum, but not when compared to walnut. The thermal conductivity of titanium at 300K is 21.9 W/m-K. The thermal conductivity of aluminum at 300K is 237 W/m-K. The thermal conductivity of walnut is only 0.17 W/m-K for 15% moisture content. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |