![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was in the process of trading-in a 2006 Outback 3.0 VDC that I'd purchased Added Security (7/100,000, $100 deductible) on. The car has 11,500 miles on it. I paid the dealer (same one I am trading it in to) $1650, the price that I found online (they wanted the "standard" $1950), and, since it states on the back of the Added Security form you get that this MUST be refunded if the car is traded-in to a dealer (it can be transferred to the new owner, if sold privately, for $35), I fully expected and demanded to get back $1650 (maybe minus $35 or something for paperwork). I was told that this will be pro-rated and I'll only be getting back $1350. Since Added Security can be bought at any time during the original warranty period, and, doesn't take affect until the original warranty period expires, I think I'm getting ripped off. Any reason I should accept a "pro-rated" return of my money on Added Security? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was in the process of trading-in a 2006 Outback 3.0 VDC that I'd purchased Added Security (7/100,000, $100 deductible) on. The car has 11,500 miles on it. I paid the dealer (same one I am trading it in to) $1650, the price that I found online (they wanted the "standard" $1950), and, since it states on the back of the Added Security form you get that this MUST be refunded if the car is traded-in to a dealer (it can be transferred to the new owner, if sold privately, for $35), I fully expected and demanded to get back $1650 (maybe minus $35 or something for paperwork). I was told that this will be pro-rated and I'll only be getting back $1350. Since Added Security can be bought at any time during the original warranty period, and, doesn't take affect until the original warranty period expires, I think I'm getting ripped off. Any reason I should accept a "pro-rated" return of my money on Added Security? Thanks. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
For what it's worth, I just bought a new Outback and was of course offered the Subaru extended warranty during the sale. I declined, but the salesman told me that (1) the extended warranty actually starts at the time of sale, along with the regular warranties, and (2) you can buy the extended warranty any time before the 3 yr/36000 mi standard warranty is up. If (1) above applies in your case, then the $1350 they are offering back reflects a little over a year you had all of the warranties in effect. BTW, why were you trading in the VDC? "Bill Bradley" <wdbradley3 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message news:W7idnaKEn7El0AbYnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... I was in the process of trading-in a 2006 Outback 3.0 VDC that I'd purchased Added Security (7/100,000, $100 deductible) on. The car has 11,500 miles on it. I paid the dealer (same one I am trading it in to) $1650, the price that I found online (they wanted the "standard" $1950), and, since it states on the back of the Added Security form you get that this MUST be refunded if the car is traded-in to a dealer (it can be transferred to the new owner, if sold privately, for $35), I fully expected and demanded to get back $1650 (maybe minus $35 or something for paperwork). I was told that this will be pro-rated and I'll only be getting back $1350. Since Added Security can be bought at any time during the original warranty period, and, doesn't take affect until the original warranty period expires, I think I'm getting ripped off. Any reason I should accept a "pro-rated" return of my money on Added Security? Thanks. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Right, you can buy it at any time during the initial 3 year/36,000 mile standard warranty, and...it's the SAME price. Sooo...why would I lose money in getting it back? I'd be happy to let the car keep it, as long as they reimburse me. "Tcassette" <tcassette2 (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote in message news:bA_mh.32$Dy2.19 (AT) newsfe20 (DOT) lga... For what it's worth, I just bought a new Outback and was of course offered the Subaru extended warranty during the sale. I declined, but the salesman told me that (1) the extended warranty actually starts at the time of sale, along with the regular warranties, and (2) you can buy the extended warranty any time before the 3 yr/36000 mi standard warranty is up. If (1) above applies in your case, then the $1350 they are offering back reflects a little over a year you had all of the warranties in effect. BTW, why were you trading in the VDC? "Bill Bradley" <wdbradley3 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message news:W7idnaKEn7El0AbYnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... I was in the process of trading-in a 2006 Outback 3.0 VDC that I'd purchased Added Security (7/100,000, $100 deductible) on. The car has 11,500 miles on it. I paid the dealer (same one I am trading it in to) $1650, the price that I found online (they wanted the "standard" $1950), and, since it states on the back of the Added Security form you get that this MUST be refunded if the car is traded-in to a dealer (it can be transferred to the new owner, if sold privately, for $35), I fully expected and demanded to get back $1650 (maybe minus $35 or something for paperwork). I was told that this will be pro-rated and I'll only be getting back $1350. Since Added Security can be bought at any time during the original warranty period, and, doesn't take affect until the original warranty period expires, I think I'm getting ripped off. Any reason I should accept a "pro-rated" return of my money on Added Security? Thanks. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |