![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'd love to know who their focus groups are. When I was shopping for a truck, the only ones I could find were the TRD versions, which happen to come with tires that are pretty much useless for rain & snow. Now, I haven't a clue about the accuracy of my next statement, but I'll guess and say that at least 2/3 of customers who bought those trucks will never EVER go off-road to any extent, unless a gravel parking lot fits that definition. How about offering customers tires made for the real world? |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 12 May 2004 15:16:55 GMT, "Doug Kanter" ancientangler (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: I'd love to know who their focus groups are. When I was shopping for a truck, the only ones I could find were the TRD versions, which happen to come with tires that are pretty much useless for rain & snow. Now, I haven't a clue about the accuracy of my next statement, but I'll guess and say that at least 2/3 of customers who bought those trucks will never EVER go off-road to any extent, unless a gravel parking lot fits that definition. How about offering customers tires made for the real world? One of the common complaints about the non-TRD Tundra is that the suspension is TOO soft and "luxury car like". The TRD suspension firms it up nicely. Without it, even the slightest washboard (including SoCal freeways) will have the suspension bottoming out in no time. |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
Josh Were you happy with the five speed? "Josh Jona Rael" <joshjonarael (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote in message news:20040511201405.17668.00000334 (AT) mb-m15 (DOT) aol.com... I just traded in my 2002 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 TRD Off Road ext cab & 5 speed truck for a Chevy Colorado. |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
The new replacement is bigger, uglier, more money(a lot more), and gets worse gas mileage. They're trying to turn it into a mini-F150. I'd get the 2004 and enjoy the last of the frugal small trucks made by Toyota. |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Rich Lockyer" <rlockyer (AT) linkline (DOT) DONTSPAMME.com> wrote in message news:6ja6a0t6ulcdv8qt2m693k5et0trkocpth (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Wed, 12 May 2004 15:16:55 GMT, "Doug Kanter" ancientangler (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: I'd love to know who their focus groups are. When I was shopping for a truck, the only ones I could find were the TRD versions, which happen to come with tires that are pretty much useless for rain & snow. Now, I haven't a clue about the accuracy of my next statement, but I'll guess and say that at least 2/3 of customers who bought those trucks will never EVER go off-road to any extent, unless a gravel parking lot fits that definition. How about offering customers tires made for the real world? One of the common complaints about the non-TRD Tundra is that the suspension is TOO soft and "luxury car like". The TRD suspension firms it up nicely. Without it, even the slightest washboard (including SoCal freeways) will have the suspension bottoming out in no time. I guess there was no in-between step, without starting with the softer suspension and modifying it. Or, maybe I didn't do my research. I just wanted to get rid of my 92 Taurus and get a vehicle that would tow my small boat without my having to worry about breaking down in the middle of the Adirondack mountains. I eliminated domestic vehicles, for mental health reasons, but I came real close to buying a Crown Victoria for its rear wheel drive. The upgrade suspension was actually pretty solid. But, then I started seeing news stories about the secret feature: exploding gas tank. :-) |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
I would just like to let you know I just bought a 2005 Tacoma DC 4x4 w/TRD package. All I have to say is that this truck is by far the best vehicle I have ever driven! First the increase in size of the interior, simply made it possible for Adults to drive and be passengers comfortably in a Tacoma. Prior versions were really made for small people no taller than 5'6". Second, this truck handles like a dream. . .lastly, the increase in engine has made it one hell of a fun vehicle to drive. I guarantee that if you go test drive one of these trucks, you'll buy one! Doug Kanter wrote: "Rich Lockyer" <rlockyer (AT) linkline (DOT) DONTSPAMME.com> wrote in message news:6ja6a0t6ulcdv8qt2m693k5et0trkocpth (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Wed, 12 May 2004 15:16:55 GMT, "Doug Kanter" ancientangler (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: I'd love to know who their focus groups are. When I was shopping for a truck, the only ones I could find were the TRD versions, which happen to come with tires that are pretty much useless for rain & snow. Now, I haven't a clue about the accuracy of my next statement, but I'll guess and say that at least 2/3 of customers who bought those trucks will never EVER go off-road to any extent, unless a gravel parking lot fits that definition. How about offering customers tires made for the real world? One of the common complaints about the non-TRD Tundra is that the suspension is TOO soft and "luxury car like". The TRD suspension firms it up nicely. Without it, even the slightest washboard (including SoCal freeways) will have the suspension bottoming out in no time. I guess there was no in-between step, without starting with the softer suspension and modifying it. Or, maybe I didn't do my research. I just wanted to get rid of my 92 Taurus and get a vehicle that would tow my small boat without my having to worry about breaking down in the middle of the Adirondack mountains. I eliminated domestic vehicles, for mental health reasons, but I came real close to buying a Crown Victoria for its rear wheel drive. The upgrade suspension was actually pretty solid. But, then I started seeing news stories about the secret feature: exploding gas tank. :-) |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |