Re: OT Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming

dbu.,, 5/16/2007,7:57:40 PM, wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont
entRe
cord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=

Here's the tiny: http://tinyurl.com/36jyvw

Maybe these scientists realized there wasn't going to be any public
funding coming their way and decided its better to clear their names
from the list of morons associated with Al Gore.

--
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the
support of Paul." ~ George Bernard Shaw

What about the thousands of scientist who do not recieve federal funding who
contend that man is influencing the current warming patern?

Also, how can you on one hand claim it cannot be proven and on the other
claim scientist have proven it?

Thats what I hate from both sides. Both sides claim to have the proof and
the other side cannot prove them wrong. It sadly represents American
politics to perfection.


"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

dbu.,, 5/16/2007,7:57:40 PM, wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont
entRe
cord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=

Here's the tiny: http://tinyurl.com/36jyvw

Maybe these scientists realized there wasn't going to be any public
funding coming their way and decided its better to clear their names
from the list of morons associated with Al Gore.

--
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the
support of Paul." ~ George Bernard Shaw

Bitter Mavs Fan, 5/17/2007,6:52:11 AM, wrote:

What about the thousands of scientist who do not recieve federal
funding who contend that man is influencing the current warming
patern?

Scientific data can be interpreted many different ways depending upon
your inclination toward the result.

Also, how can you on one hand claim it cannot be proven and on the
other claim scientist have proven it?

The same can be said of other things. The existence of God would be
one good example.

Thats what I hate from both sides. Both sides claim to have the proof
and the other side cannot prove them wrong. It sadly represents
American politics to perfection.

That is the beauty of debate. If you don't like it like that then
there are many toatalitarian regimes that you would feel more
comfortable living in. They will tell you exactly what to think.

--
"Unfortunately I can not totally agree with comrade Stalin." ~ Famous
Last Words

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

Scientific data can be interpreted many different ways depending upon
your inclination toward the result.

My point is that there are many people who agree and disagree who arent
recieving federal funding. So it is a strawman argument to suggest that is
the only reason.

That is the beauty of debate. If you don't like it like that then
there are many toatalitarian regimes that you would feel more
comfortable living in. They will tell you exactly what to think.

So, little stalins debating little hitlers makes a democracy? Interesting!

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

dbu.,, 5/16/2007,7:57:40 PM, wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont
entRe
cord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=

Here's the tiny: http://tinyurl.com/36jyvw

Maybe these scientists realized there wasn't going to be any public
funding coming their way and decided its better to clear their names
from the list of morons associated with Al Gore.

--
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the
support of Paul." ~ George Bernard Shaw

Or maybe it's politics as usual. The blogger:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Marc_Morano

And the Senator he supports:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...ames_M._Inhofe

I took a quick look. Quite a few of those "conversions" are old and quite a
few are not climatologists.

As for whether or not they're in it for the money, most who worked on the
IPCC donated their time.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

badgolferman wrote:

That is the beauty of debate.

Or the futility of it.