AutosTalk Forums  

2001-2004 model year fatalities

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss 2001-2004 model year fatalities in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
C. E. White
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-17-2007 , 06:37 PM







"Wickeddoll" <wickeddoll1958DieSpammersDie (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote


Quote:
Same running gear, different body. The Charger is closer to the 300. They
all share the same platform.

Ed

And just as fugly.
Well none of them are my taste, but they are distinctive and they did push
up Chrysler sales. Don't forget Chrysler's April 2007 sales were actually
higher than their April 2006 sales. Even Toyota couldn't claim that.
However, like a lot of distinctive vehicles, the market can become
saturated. However, sometimes they can set trends. When the '86 Ford Taurus
first arrived there was quite a few people who thought it was ugly. However
within a new years a large number of cars were emulating the look.

I had some fun looking for a rental car for a vacation we are planning for
next month. Four of us will be using one car, so I was looking for full size
cars. Apparently full size means Taurus or Impala, which should be fine.
What I found weird was that some rental car agencies considers the Dodge
Charger a "premium" upgrade rental and charge more for it. I thought this
was insane. The interior is smaller than an Impala, the V-6 Charger gets
worse gas mileage than an Impala, and the trunk is smaller - on what wacko
planet does this make it an upgrade? Interestingly one rental agency did
consider the Charger to be the same class as the Impala. Personally, I'd
consider it a downgrade compared to an Impala. But I guess different strokes
for different folks. I only wish the "Taurus" would be the rebaged Ford Five
Hundred, but I am certain it will be at least a one year old "old style"
Taurus. I am hoping for the Impala.

Ed




Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
Wickeddoll
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-17-2007 , 06:51 PM







"C. E. White" ...
Quote:
"Wickeddoll"...

Same running gear, different body. The Charger is closer to the 300.
They all share the same platform.

Ed

And just as fugly.

Well none of them are my taste, but they are distinctive and they did push
up Chrysler sales. Don't forget Chrysler's April 2007 sales were actually
higher than their April 2006 sales. Even Toyota couldn't claim that.
I'd say they're the Chryslers I notice the most, but that's probably because
I find them so repugnant.

Quote:
However, like a lot of distinctive vehicles, the market can become
saturated. However, sometimes they can set trends. When the '86 Ford
Taurus first arrived there was quite a few people who thought it was ugly.
However within a new years a large number of cars were emulating the look.
My best friend loved her 1985 Escort - I thought about getting one, but
decided there were too damned many of them (same way I feel about the Camry)
Quote:
I had some fun looking for a rental car for a vacation we are planning for
next month. Four of us will be using one car, so I was looking for full
size cars. Apparently full size means Taurus or Impala, which should be
fine. What I found weird was that some rental car agencies considers the
Dodge Charger a "premium" upgrade rental and charge more for it. I thought
this was insane. The interior is smaller than an Impala, the V-6 Charger
gets worse gas mileage than an Impala, and the trunk is smaller - on what
wacko planet does this make it an upgrade? Interestingly one rental agency
did consider the Charger to be the same class as the Impala. Personally,
I'd consider it a downgrade compared to an Impala. But I guess different
strokes for different folks. I only wish the "Taurus" would be the rebaged
Ford Five Hundred, but I am certain it will be at least a one year old
"old style" Taurus. I am hoping for the Impala.

Ed

Taurus (my Zodiac sign, if you believe that stuff) of the mid-90s resembled
peach pits to me, so I never found them appealing. I don't really know what
they look like now. Probably seen them, but didn't realize.

My uncle (or someone in my family) had an Impala and loved that thing, back
in the 70s. I think the current ones look pretty sharp, but why do only
slow-assed old folks drive them?!

LOL

Natalie




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.