![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
Wickeddoll wrote: "Jeff Strickland" ... | | "Robert Watson" ... | > | >> | http://s195323775.onlinehome.us/page...wclearance.jpg | >> | | >> | > That *can't* be good for his car. | >> | | >> | > Natalie | >> | | >> | I don't see a car. Just an SUV. | | >> Which is classified as a car by many sources, smart guy. | | > Big deal. GMC is a truck brand, not a car brand. | | | You are losing sight of the bigger picture, the bottom of the damn thing is | scraping the ground. It doesn't matter that Natalie called it a car and you | want to call it a truck. Well, it seems to matter to you, but I'm sure it | doesn't matter to anybody else ... I think he sees me as slamming GM, but that really isn't it. I'd say the same thing if it had been a Rav-4, or some other Toyota SUV. Apples and pears, but some people like to sneer. I still say that's too damned low for a vehicle of that weight/shape. I see you as slamming the person who lowered the truck in the first place. I think the truck looks stupid, too. But I didn't waste my money on it. I even saw a Rolls Royce (I think the from the 60s) turned into a 4x4 (jacked it up high and all). I thought that was pretty silly too. |
|
It's someone else's money. They're free to do stupid stuff with it, if they want. Jeff |
|
| | One problem you have here is that Natalie has been here a very long time and | we like her, you are new and we don't like you already. Awwww, thanks. :-) Natalie |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Wickeddoll" ... http://s195323775.onlinehome.us/page...wclearance.jpg That *can't* be good for his car. Its hard to tell exactly, but I'd say there's still about 6" of clearance. I'd say that what the owner has done is put wide very low profile tires that in effect lower the vehicle. Of course this means the engine revs go up for a given speed compared to the original tires. |
|
Then there's how the tires stick outside the fenders and chuck all the road dirt at the side paint ... |
|
Aren't there regulations that say tires have to be within the fender or fender extension on road vehicles? SD Dunno about NC, but there *should* be |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
Wickeddoll wrote: "Jeff Strickland" ... | | "Robert Watson" ... | > Wickeddoll wrote: | >> | > http://s195323775.onlinehome.us/page...wclearance.jpg | >> | | >> | > That *can't* be good for his car. | >> | | >> | > Natalie | >> | | >> | I don't see a car. Just an SUV. | | >> Which is classified as a car by many sources, smart guy. | | > Big deal. GMC is a truck brand, not a car brand. | | | You are losing sight of the bigger picture, the bottom of the damn thing is | scraping the ground. It doesn't matter that Natalie called it a car and you | want to call it a truck. Well, it seems to matter to you, but I'm sure it | doesn't matter to anybody else ... I think he sees me as slamming GM, but that really isn't it. I'd say the same thing if it had been a Rav-4, or some other Toyota SUV. Apples and pears, but some people like to sneer. I still say that's too damned low for a vehicle of that weight/shape. I see you as slamming the person who lowered the truck in the first place. I think the truck looks stupid, too. But I didn't waste my money on it. I even saw a Rolls Royce (I think the from the 60s) turned into a 4x4 (jacked it up high and all). I thought that was pretty silly too. It's someone else's money. They're free to do stupid stuff with it, if they want. Jeff |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |