AutosTalk Forums  

Mechanical Dependability

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss Mechanical Dependability in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Mike Hunter
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-01-2005 , 02:26 PM






As do the Korean cars that the courier companies are buying.for $4,000 less.
Courier fleets generally run them around the clock and they easily
accumulate 100K in a year. They also use small cars from Ford, GM,
Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, VW, etc and ALL are problem free as well

mike hunt

"Scott in Florida" <JustAsk (AT) Florida (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 01:58:39 GMT, "TenPercent"
tenpercent (AT) not-real-address (DOT) com> wrote:

It just amazes me that you can buy a car for
$15,000 like the Corolla and it will have a better
long-term "JD Power" mechanical dependability rating
after 5 years than a car that costs a whole lot more
like a Mercedes, Cadillac, or Jaguar. Am I interpreting
the JD Power surveys wrongly?

For example, the '97 Corolla gets 4 stars in the
JD Power survey for mechanical dependability
compared to just 3 stars for a '97 S-Class Mercedes.

My '92 Corolla Wagon just keeps rollin along...

--

Scott in Florida

Still Voting Democratic?

You are Stuck On Stupid!



Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Mike Hunter
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-01-2005 , 02:30 PM






Not enough numbers sold to make a fair comparison. Smaller numbers show
more problem when working with statistics. That is why Toyota is showing
more problem now that they are selling in the millions rather than hundreds
of thousands Murphy's law


mike hunt


"TenPercent" <tenpercent (AT) not-real-address (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Anyone know why JD Powers doesn't include surveys
of Rolls Royce, Ferrari, and Lotus owners in their
automobile rankings? They include Lexus, Jag, and
Mercedes owners.



Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Mike Hunter
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-01-2005 , 02:47 PM



If you look at J DO POWERS results is percentages, rather than as lists from
top to bottom as they present their surveys, you will see the ALL have
problems and they are ALL within the same percentages clustered around 2%.
J D POWERS are designed so that every manufacture can point to them as a
sales tool. What manufacture would pay their subscription rate is they
could not use something from the surveys? They best and only true survey is
sales numbers. More buyer believe the Camry is the best mid size sedan for
the price, that is why it is number one. The same reason the Ford F150 is
the number one vehicle, total sales and why GM make the best cars and
trucks, since they sell more than any other manufacture. As well as why
Wal-Mart is the number one retailer in the world, sales. YOU may prefer a
particular retailer buy more buyer prefer Wal-Mart obviously

mike hunt


"C. E. White" <cewhite (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"TenPercent" <tenpercent (AT) not-real-address (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:jZz9f.282$Nd.108115 (AT) newshog (DOT) newsread.com...
It just amazes me that you can buy a car for
$15,000 like the Corolla and it will have a better
long-term "JD Power" mechanical dependability rating
after 5 years than a car that costs a whole lot more
like a Mercedes, Cadillac, or Jaguar. Am I interpreting
the JD Power surveys wrongly?

But what are they actually surveying? How reliable is the survey? Isn't
there a lot more to go wrong with a Mercedes than a Corolla? Are Mercedes
owner more or less likely to report problems that Toyota owners? Most of
these surveys depend on people deciding what is serious - do Toyota and
Mercedes owners have the same opinion of what is serious? My sister will
tell you her Honda has never had a problem - except I know the drivers
side visor just fell of, the muffler has been replaced twice, the plug
wires failed, paint is falling off the bumpers, and wheel covers, etc.
However, if JD Powers surveyed my sister, Honda would look pretty damn
good. If they asked me, they would look pretty bad (I would claim at least
5 problems, she would claim none). From what I've seen Toyota owners will
put up with a lot more crap than Mercedes owners. Isn't it possible this
skews the results?

For example, the '97 Corolla gets 4 stars in the
JD Power survey for mechanical dependability
compared to just 3 stars for a '97 S-Class Mercedes.

I am not sure where JD Powers is getting the data to determine the stars.
I am assuming that it is coming from past results of the Vehicle
Dependability Study. The 2005 version of this study is on line at
http://www.jdpa.com/news/releases/pr...05089&search=1 .
Take a look at this. Doesn't it make you wonder about the significance of
their data collection when Buick, Lincoln, and Cadillac all out scored
Toyota? Or that Mercury scored significantly higher than Ford and Buick
scored way higher than Pontiac? Do you really think the survey is good
enough to be significant to the level that you can say that Toyota with an
average of 1.94 problem per vehicle is really better than Ford that has an
average of 2.31 problems per vehicle? Especially when Mercury had 1.95
problems per vehicle? Looks to me, given all the possible sources of
error, there is not much difference between any of the major brands. And
certainly, a Toyota is not worth thousands more because you might have
0.37 fewer problems than a Ford. But if you do think this, why wouldn't
you buy a Buick, which averages, according to this survey, only 1.63
problems per car.

Prior year surveys are available at:

http://www.jdpa.com/news/releases/pr...04055&search=1
http://www.jdpa.com/news/releases/pr...03050&search=1
http://www.jdpa.com/news/releases/pr...02141&search=1
http://www.jdpa.com/news/releases/pr...=2074&search=1

The differences are too small to be significant, and certainly not a
reasons to buy a Toyota if you like one of the other brands better for
other reasons (style, features, cost, etc.). Now if you just want to prove
how smart you are for buying a Toyota instead of a Mercedes, I won't argue
with you.

Ed





Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
C. E. White
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-01-2005 , 04:38 PM




"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
If you look at J DO POWERS results is percentages, rather than as lists
from top to bottom as they present their surveys, you will see the ALL
have problems and they are ALL within the same percentages clustered
around 2%. J D POWERS are designed so that every manufacture can point to
them as a sales tool. What manufacture would pay their subscription rate
is they could not use something from the surveys? They best and only true
survey is sales numbers. More buyer believe the Camry is the best mid
size sedan for the price, that is why it is number one. The same reason
the Ford F150 is the number one vehicle, total sales and why GM make the
best cars and trucks, since they sell more than any other manufacture. As
well as why Wal-Mart is the number one retailer in the world, sales. YOU
may prefer a particular retailer buy more buyer prefer Wal-Mart obviously

mike hunt
Mike, your spin assumes buyers have good information and make purchasing
decisions for rational reasons. Reliability is only one factor people use
when purchasing a vehicle. It might be that F150s have terrible reliability,
but because of price, style, features, etc people are willing to buy them
despite poor reliability (and no, I don't think F150s are unreliable, I am
just using it as an example). And what about brand loyalty? Last year was
the first time in my life, my Father actually considered buying something
other than a Ford (he ended up in a Ford anyhow). I know lots of people that
only shop for their pet brand of cars. I know more than few people who are
only willing to look at Toyotas. Also, you are totally ignoring the effects
of advertising. Advertising must work, otherwise companies would not spend
so much on it. I am so tired of car ads, I almost can't watch TV. In case
you missed it, it is Ford Toyotathon Truck Drive to be Number One Moving
Forward Switch Month again......and again.......

As for Wal*Mart - I HATE Wal*Mart, but I go there all the time. The local
Wal*Marts are dirty, cluttered, crowded, staffed with surly workers, and
generally depressing. However, they usually have everything I want and I
only need go in one store that is relatively close to my home. I can put up
with the general crappy condition of the stores because they save me time.
I'd actually be willing to pay more for stuff in nicer stores with
friendlier people, except Wal*Mart has driven all those out of business.
When I can, I stay out of stores altogether and just order stuff over the
internet. I have noticed that the unionized workers at one of the local
grocery store chains are a lot happier and friendlier than the workers at
Wal*Mart, or Food Lion (my other least favorite store). I wonder why? The
prices for the groceries I buy aren't much different between the stores
(despite lots of "super low price" ads), so I go to the store with the happy
people to buy my groceries. Heck, sometimes I have to fight them off when
they want to carry out my groceries for me. At Wal*Mart, I am lucky if I can
force them to check me out.

Ed




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
C. E. White
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-01-2005 , 05:32 PM




"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Actually Mercedes never built reliable cars. In the late 70's a doctor
friend once told me that the 2 greatest days in the life of a doctor is
when he gets his first Mercedes, and when he trades it in.
And yet used Mercedes always seem to have great resale value. Makes you
wonder about the rationality of car buyers doesn't it.....

Ed




Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Norm De Plume
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-01-2005 , 07:56 PM




High Tech Misfit wrote:
Quote:
TenPercent wrote:

For example, the '97 Corolla gets 4 stars in the
JD Power survey for mechanical dependability
compared to just 3 stars for a '97 S-Class Mercedes.

That's correct. The Germans just don't build cars like they used to. :-(
With black dashboards and 800 fewer adjustment options for the stereo
system?



Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Art
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-02-2005 , 11:29 AM



Expected reliability is just one attribute in considering value of a car.


"C. E. White" <cewhite (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote in message
news_M9f.4244$AS6.2900 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net...
Actually Mercedes never built reliable cars. In the late 70's a doctor
friend once told me that the 2 greatest days in the life of a doctor is
when he gets his first Mercedes, and when he trades it in.

And yet used Mercedes always seem to have great resale value. Makes you
wonder about the rationality of car buyers doesn't it.....

Ed




Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Mike Hunter
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-02-2005 , 04:32 PM



So that is why the Camry is the number one selling mid size sedan in the US
..

"C. E. White" <cewhite (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:RdWdncjta_3CW_reUSdV9g (AT) ptd (DOT) net...
If you look at J DO POWERS results is percentages, rather than as lists
from top to bottom as they present their surveys, you will see the ALL
have problems and they are ALL within the same percentages clustered
around 2%. J D POWERS are designed so that every manufacture can point
to them as a sales tool. What manufacture would pay their subscription
rate is they could not use something from the surveys? They best and
only true survey is sales numbers. More buyer believe the Camry is the
best mid size sedan for the price, that is why it is number one. The
same reason the Ford F150 is the number one vehicle, total sales and why
GM make the best cars and trucks, since they sell more than any other
manufacture. As well as why Wal-Mart is the number one retailer in the
world, sales. YOU may prefer a particular retailer buy more buyer prefer
Wal-Mart obviously

mike hunt

Mike, your spin assumes buyers have good information and make purchasing
decisions for rational reasons. Reliability is only one factor people use
when purchasing a vehicle. It might be that F150s have terrible
reliability, but because of price, style, features, etc people are willing
to buy them despite poor reliability (and no, I don't think F150s are
unreliable, I am just using it as an example). And what about brand
loyalty? Last year was the first time in my life, my Father actually
considered buying something other than a Ford (he ended up in a Ford
anyhow). I know lots of people that only shop for their pet brand of cars.
I know more than few people who are only willing to look at Toyotas. Also,
you are totally ignoring the effects of advertising. Advertising must
work, otherwise companies would not spend so much on it. I am so tired of
car ads, I almost can't watch TV. In case you missed it, it is Ford
Toyotathon Truck Drive to be Number One Moving Forward Switch Month
again......and again.......




Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
C. E. White
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-03-2005 , 09:28 AM




"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
So that is why the Camry is the number one selling mid size sedan in the
US
.
If I knew that, I think I'd have the secret to life. I have ridden in quite
a few Camry's and never really understood the attraction. Boring styling,
mediocre appointments, mediocre performance, all at a premium price. I'd
love to claim it was Toyota advertising, but to me the Toyota national ads
are at best enigmatic (exactly what did/does the "Oh What A Feeling" or
":Moving Forward" slogans mean?). The local Toyota ads are just insulting.
One of the local Toyota dealers is now running ads where dogs are hyping his
cars (you have to see them - they are really cheesy). I know a lot of women
like Camry's, but I am not sure why. But then I never understood why my
Sisters both decided they wanted Volkswagens (at least they learned from
those mistakes). Maybe it is the favorable rating from Consumer Reports. But
then my experience with Consumer Reports has been that if they recommend
something, you should definitely not buy that product. My Father is an avid
Consumer Reports reader and he constantly buys things because of their
recommendations. So far he has suffered through crappy vacuum cleaners and
TVs because of their recommendations. When he was buying a new car last year
he decided he wanted a Highlander based on the Consumer Reports reviews.
Fortunately he actually tried several vehicles before he bought one
(actually I made him try several - initially he just wanted me to go buy him
a Highlander). After actually trying a few vehicles, he bought a Ford
Freestyle.

Ed




Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Dana
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Mechanical Dependability - 11-03-2005 , 10:44 PM



I really don't think that's true at all , in the 70's and 80's Mercedes
built terrific cars . It didn't matter if you bought the top of the line or
the least expensive model they made . You were always going to get a quality
car and a good ownership experiece . That being said , German cars require
more service then Japanese or domestic makes . These days quality is hit or
miss . I wouldn't own one if It didn't have a warrenty , and I would
probablly dump it when the warrenty ran out.


-Dana


"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Actually Mercedes never built reliable cars. In the late 70's a doctor
friend once told me that the 2 greatest days in the life of a doctor is
when he gets his first Mercedes, and when he trades it in.


"High Tech Misfit" <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:1y1jkfcroc8hg.dlg (AT) hightech (DOT) misfit...
TenPercent wrote:

It just amazes me that you can buy a car for
$15,000 like the Corolla and it will have a better
long-term "JD Power" mechanical dependability rating
after 5 years than a car that costs a whole lot more
like a Mercedes, Cadillac, or Jaguar. Am I interpreting
the JD Power surveys wrongly?

For example, the '97 Corolla gets 4 stars in the
JD Power survey for mechanical dependability
compared to just 3 stars for a '97 S-Class Mercedes.

That's correct. The Germans just don't build cars like they used to. :-(





Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.