AutosTalk Forums  

No Sludge!

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss No Sludge! in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Charles @ Kankakee
 
Posts: n/a

Default No Sludge! - 11-11-2005 , 07:15 AM






Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant on the
pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what, Phillip? No
sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the records.

So, Mr High-and-Mighty, you were WRONG. Now serving crow for Mr. Phillip. .
.. .

Charles of Kankakee



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
TeGGeR®
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-11-2005 , 07:47 AM






"Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in
news:75KdnVZmbdfTF-neRVn-hQ (AT) comcast (DOT) com:

Quote:
Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant
on the pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what,
Phillip? No sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the
records.

So, Mr High-and-Mighty, you were WRONG. Now serving crow for Mr.
Phillip. . . .


What? I must have come in late. What's the background here? What did Philip
say?

--
TeGGeR®



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Dan J.S.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-11-2005 , 09:20 AM




"Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant on
the pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what, Phillip?
No sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the records.

So, Mr High-and-Mighty, you were WRONG. Now serving crow for Mr. Phillip.
. . .

Charles of Kankakee

What is this regarding?




Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Mark
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-11-2005 , 09:29 AM



I always believed Philip to be a sludge skeptic, believing that regular
maintenance would lead to very little accumulation.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Mark
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-11-2005 , 09:29 AM



I always believed Philip to be a sludge skeptic, believing that regular
maintenance would lead to very little accumulation.


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Wolfgang
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-11-2005 , 10:27 AM



What model and year of yota (not all exhibit the problem which apparently
was due to design issue)? I suspect short trips are more a contibuting
cause to the sludge problem too.

"Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant on
the pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what, Phillip?
No sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the records.

So, Mr High-and-Mighty, you were WRONG. Now serving crow for Mr. Phillip.
. . .

Charles of Kankakee




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
C. E. White
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-11-2005 , 10:50 AM




"Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant on
the pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what, Phillip?
No sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the records.
What's so special about that? I've never really had any sort of sludge
problem in any engine I've owned. Heck I took the pan off a 50 year old farm
tractor which had been supjected to crappy old non-detergent motor oil for
half of its life, and it didn't have any sludge. The only real sludge
problem I've ever seen was a friend's Oldsmobile. He used Quaker State 10W40
and changed it at the GM recommended intervals. He had to scrap the crap out
of the lifter valley with a spoon.

Ed




Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Charles @ Kankakee
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-12-2005 , 02:03 AM




"TeGGeR®" <tegger (AT) tegger (DOT) c0m> wrote

Quote:
"Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in
news:75KdnVZmbdfTF-neRVn-hQ (AT) comcast (DOT) com:

Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant
on the pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what,
Phillip? No sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the
records.

So, Mr High-and-Mighty, you were WRONG. Now serving crow for Mr.
Phillip. . . .



What? I must have come in late. What's the background here? What did
Philip
say?

--
TeGGeR®

Some months ago, I asked what could be wrong with the Corolla as it had
started eating about a quart between changes. No signs of dripping or
leaking and no real signs of burning, either. He accused me of not
maintaining the car and that I had a sludge buildup. . . .

1. I have receipts for oil changes every 3000. Not cheap oil, either.
Valvoline Max-Life 10W30.

2. Now that we found that the pan gasket was seeping, that explains the
loss of oil and the lack of dripping. If it was seeping, the airflow past
the engine while it was running blew it away. I almost never idle the thing
while it's sitting for more than 30 seconds, unless I'm at a traffic light.
But I do drive it pretty hard . . . .

3. No sludge was found when they had to drop the pan gasket. Not even
varnish.

Next thing to go will probably be the seals in block. I'm not used to
front-drive engines. If it was a rear-drive setup, I'd expect the rear main
to go out next.

Charles of Kankakee




Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Charles @ Kankakee
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-12-2005 , 02:07 AM




"Wolfgang" <NOwolfgangdieterSPAM (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
What model and year of yota (not all exhibit the problem which apparently
was due to design issue)? I suspect short trips are more a contibuting
cause to the sludge problem too.

"Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:75KdnVZmbdfTF-neRVn-hQ (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant on
the pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what, Phillip?
No sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the records.

So, Mr High-and-Mighty, you were WRONG. Now serving crow for Mr.
Phillip. . . .

Charles of Kankakee



This thing doesn't get hardly any short trips. I drive it about 90 miles
one way each day except Saturday. That's how it's got 209,400 on it right
now. It gets a short trip at 5 in the morning on Sat, Tues, and Thurs, and
a short trip at 7:30 in the morning on Mon, Wed and Fri. But then on
Monday, Wed, Friday and Sunday nights, and Tuesday and Thursday morning, it
gets a 90 mile drive.

Charles of Kankakee




Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Charles @ Kankakee
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: No Sludge! - 11-12-2005 , 02:19 AM




"C. E. White" <cewhite3 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:75KdnVZmbdfTF-neRVn-hQ (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
Well I finally had to do it. At 209,000 miles, the original sealant on
the pan was starting to weep . . . .

So we took off the pan to replace the sealant, and guess what, Phillip?
No sludge. None at all. I had them even make a note in the records.

What's so special about that? I've never really had any sort of sludge
problem in any engine I've owned. Heck I took the pan off a 50 year old
farm tractor which had been supjected to crappy old non-detergent motor
oil for half of its life, and it didn't have any sludge. The only real
sludge problem I've ever seen was a friend's Oldsmobile. He used Quaker
State 10W40 and changed it at the GM recommended intervals. He had to
scrap the crap out of the lifter valley with a spoon.

Ed

I had asked for possible causes of oil loss. She had started using about a
quart between changes.

Phillip had practically accused me of:

1. Not maintaining it. I have receipts for oil changes every 3000 miles.

2. Using cheap oil. I use MaxLife 10W30. If I thought I could use their
DuraBlend, I'd use that. I did until 125,000 miles, anyway.

I have to rely on this car. I can't afford to do the cheap oil trick.
And we seem to have found the loss. As fast as I drive, it's blowing past
the pan when I'm driving. A new seal should fix that. Now I have to worry
about the mains going. Don't know if I have to worry about the front main.
Lost a rear main before, but that was on a front-engine rear-drive setup
that had been run summer and winter and 36,000 miles per year on Kendall
20-20W by the Previous Owner, or PO as it;s known as in some circles.

I wouldn't use QS in a lawn mower from what I hear about it. QS is the
primary reason my Dad wouldn't use multiweight oils until I talked him into
it with his 77 Corolla. He was probably glad I did. We got 207,000 out of
it, but we didn't use QS in it, either. . . .

Apparently QS has a high paraffin content, or did in the old days, that's
what they apparently used to use to make oil 'multi-weight', but it must
have been terrible on engines. Mom used to keep paraffin in the kitchen
for topping jelly jars. . . .

Charles of Kankakee

Charles of Kankakee




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.