![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
|
WickeddollŽ <wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> writes: Sure they do, but the point was that this guy pulled that particular stereotype out of his ass, for no apparent reason other than Berry being a black woman. What evidence do you have of that? With all due respect, I think you're going out of your way to take offense. |
|
My impression of the incident is based on the description of the events in the article, which is all either of us has to go on. Yours, on the other hand, is based on supposition: what you believe was going thorugh the guy's mind at the time. The thing is, you have no way of knowing what he was thinking, and yet you default to the assumption that he was beling deliberately offensive. Where I come from, that's known as having a chip on one's shoulder. |
| What the hell was his point? Rereading the article, my take on it is (still) that Moyles, a Brit, was caught up in the moment and reached for an American -- specif- ically, a New York -- stereotype to do an impression of, and that just by chance, the one he happened to seize on was that of a black Brooklyn thug. |
|
Why would he have deliberately tried to offend a guest on his show? What possible gain would there have been for him? |
|
And what reason did Berry have to take offense? Was she suggesting that there are no black thugs in New York City? That would be a ridiculous claim, of course. So...what exactly was the problem? |
|
No, all New York thugs aren't black...but *that* one, the one that Moyles did an impression of, was. So what? Not all Jews are neurotic...but the one that Woody Allen played in so many of his films was. And yet, no one seems to believe that Allen was consumed with self-loathing when he made those films. Geoff |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |