 | |
OT Australian PM calls Dims Wimps!
Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: OT Australian PM calls Dims Wimps! -
04-29-2007
, 05:08 AM
|
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:mOtYh.847$KP1.205 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "ToMh" <tlhumm (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1177701471.344626.42280 (AT) o40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com... On Apr 27, 10:12 am, "Jeff Strickland" <c... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. Bush had an open check and full support for this war for the last 4 years. Why didn't he just kick some ass and then come home? Funny how Georgie had complete control of this war for 4 years, now it's all the Democrats fault. How is that surge going? what a F*ckin joke Bush and his cronies are, and how quick they are to start shifting the blame, the only thing this administration has proved competent in. He doesn't have full support, that's the problem. He's been fighting the whiners from Day One. The French whine, the Chinese whine, the Russians pitch a fit. These are three key allies on the UN Security Council, and not one of them has lifted a finger to help. Indeed, they've expended far more energy NOT helping than in stepping up to the plate to pull their collective load. If you realized the force was sent to the wrong country, you'd whine, too. |
therefore they did not think it was the wrong country. Their beef was that
the action was disproportionate to the offense, AND they had a huge
financial stake in Saddam remaining in power -- consider the oil-for-food
program where they each were going around the sanctions under the guise of
the oil for food, and reaping huge sums of money in the process.
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nKHYh.7414$B25.3763 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:hLtYh.845$KP1.150 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:H4rYh.7469$ya1.2791 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:w2rYh.1190$iR2.197 (AT) trnddc05 (DOT) .. Isn't that essentially the same message we got from al Qaeda in the first place? They said we didn't have the will to carry out a war against them in particular, or terror in general. Turns out they are right. With Dems at the helm, we are just a bunch of pussies that do nothing more than cry when we get sand kicked into our face. It's so much fun to watch us cry, they keep kicking the sand and we keep doing nothing. The Aussies are just repeating what the terrorists said. (I'm not meaning to denegrate the Aussies at all, I'm just saying they are repeating that which has already been said.) Given the realities of time, the prophecies of terrorists have become true. I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. You're obviously an expert at military strategy in general, and Iraq in particular. What would you do differently right now? I'm not sure what I would do, but what I wouldn't do is tell the rat-bastard terrorists that I was going to bring my troops home. Unfortunately, the one thing that will defeat terrorists does not serve a purpose that is far more important to politicians like President Rove. Decades of work by police and spooks will unravel terrorists. It's worked before, and it will continue to work. But, because this type of behind the scenes "war" isn't exciting (or visible), it doesn't provide erections for reborn children like Scott. If there are no erections, attention is lost, along with future votes. War gives Scott erections. The ONLY thing that terrorists understand is terror greater than the terror they inflict. The problem with that statement is that it demands civilized society behave in a more brutal manner than the peopel that attack them, and this is opposite of what civilized society would prefer to behave. The problem with that is, terrorists will always win because there will be an element of society that says everybody has a nice streak that we can exploit to make them better people. I'm from the element of society that says that if the nice streak turns ugly, you've blown your chance to be nice, and the only thing left to do is exterminate you. Terrorists are a zit on the ass of humanity. One does not sit around and wait for a zit to go away, one squeezes the zit and drains it. On occasion, the zit will become enflamed, but one does not stop squeezing or allow it to become an infection. |
1) Can you recall any terrorist organizations which have been snuffed out,
and HOW they were snuffed out?
2) If terror should be crushed with more terror, what do you feel is the
purpose of the intelligence agencies?
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:SKHYh.7504$ya1.4671 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:mOtYh.847$KP1.205 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "ToMh" <tlhumm (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1177701471.344626.42280 (AT) o40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com... On Apr 27, 10:12 am, "Jeff Strickland" <c... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. Bush had an open check and full support for this war for the last 4 years. Why didn't he just kick some ass and then come home? Funny how Georgie had complete control of this war for 4 years, now it's all the Democrats fault. How is that surge going? what a F*ckin joke Bush and his cronies are, and how quick they are to start shifting the blame, the only thing this administration has proved competent in. He doesn't have full support, that's the problem. He's been fighting the whiners from Day One. The French whine, the Chinese whine, the Russians pitch a fit. These are three key allies on the UN Security Council, and not one of them has lifted a finger to help. Indeed, they've expended far more energy NOT helping than in stepping up to the plate to pull their collective load. If you realized the force was sent to the wrong country, you'd whine, too. Actually, all three of those countries did not dispute the WMD claim, therefore they did not think it was the wrong country. Their beef was that the action was disproportionate to the offense, AND they had a huge financial stake in Saddam remaining in power -- consider the oil-for-food program where they each were going around the sanctions under the guise of the oil for food, and reaping huge sums of money in the process. |
You took an erroneous left turn. I was referring to our relative lack of
presence in Afghanistan. Six weeks after 9/11, the CIA did a nice job of
finding and purchasing locals who would work with us. Then, your president
sent the bulk of our troops to the wrong place. If you've been following the
news from Afghanistan, you would know we had dropped the ball.
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nKHYh.7414$B25.3763 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:hLtYh.845$KP1.150 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:H4rYh.7469$ya1.2791 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:w2rYh.1190$iR2.197 (AT) trnddc05 (DOT) .. Isn't that essentially the same message we got from al Qaeda in the first place? They said we didn't have the will to carry out a war against them in particular, or terror in general. Turns out they are right. With Dems at the helm, we are just a bunch of pussies that do nothing more than cry when we get sand kicked into our face. It's so much fun to watch us cry, they keep kicking the sand and we keep doing nothing. The Aussies are just repeating what the terrorists said. (I'm not meaning to denegrate the Aussies at all, I'm just saying they are repeating that which has already been said.) Given the realities of time, the prophecies of terrorists have become true. I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. You're obviously an expert at military strategy in general, and Iraq in particular. What would you do differently right now? I'm not sure what I would do, but what I wouldn't do is tell the rat-bastard terrorists that I was going to bring my troops home. Unfortunately, the one thing that will defeat terrorists does not serve a purpose that is far more important to politicians like President Rove. Decades of work by police and spooks will unravel terrorists. It's worked before, and it will continue to work. But, because this type of behind the scenes "war" isn't exciting (or visible), it doesn't provide erections for reborn children like Scott. If there are no erections, attention is lost, along with future votes. War gives Scott erections. The ONLY thing that terrorists understand is terror greater than the terror they inflict. The problem with that statement is that it demands civilized society behave in a more brutal manner than the peopel that attack them, and this is opposite of what civilized society would prefer to behave. The problem with that is, terrorists will always win because there will be an element of society that says everybody has a nice streak that we can exploit to make them better people. I'm from the element of society that says that if the nice streak turns ugly, you've blown your chance to be nice, and the only thing left to do is exterminate you. Terrorists are a zit on the ass of humanity. One does not sit around and wait for a zit to go away, one squeezes the zit and drains it. On occasion, the zit will become enflamed, but one does not stop squeezing or allow it to become an infection. |
the world. What do you do with a boil? You lance it with a hot tool, of
course.
Charles of Schaumburg
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:bdZYh.616$J54.114 (AT) trnddc04 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nKHYh.7414$B25.3763 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:hLtYh.845$KP1.150 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:H4rYh.7469$ya1.2791 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:w2rYh.1190$iR2.197 (AT) trnddc05 (DOT) .. Isn't that essentially the same message we got from al Qaeda in the first place? They said we didn't have the will to carry out a war against them in particular, or terror in general. Turns out they are right. With Dems at the helm, we are just a bunch of pussies that do nothing more than cry when we get sand kicked into our face. It's so much fun to watch us cry, they keep kicking the sand and we keep doing nothing. The Aussies are just repeating what the terrorists said. (I'm not meaning to denegrate the Aussies at all, I'm just saying they are repeating that which has already been said.) Given the realities of time, the prophecies of terrorists have become true. I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. You're obviously an expert at military strategy in general, and Iraq in particular. What would you do differently right now? I'm not sure what I would do, but what I wouldn't do is tell the rat-bastard terrorists that I was going to bring my troops home. Unfortunately, the one thing that will defeat terrorists does not serve a purpose that is far more important to politicians like President Rove. Decades of work by police and spooks will unravel terrorists. It's worked before, and it will continue to work. But, because this type of behind the scenes "war" isn't exciting (or visible), it doesn't provide erections for reborn children like Scott. If there are no erections, attention is lost, along with future votes. War gives Scott erections. The ONLY thing that terrorists understand is terror greater than the terror they inflict. The problem with that statement is that it demands civilized society behave in a more brutal manner than the peopel that attack them, and this is opposite of what civilized society would prefer to behave. The problem with that is, terrorists will always win because there will be an element of society that says everybody has a nice streak that we can exploit to make them better people. I'm from the element of society that says that if the nice streak turns ugly, you've blown your chance to be nice, and the only thing left to do is exterminate you. Terrorists are a zit on the ass of humanity. One does not sit around and wait for a zit to go away, one squeezes the zit and drains it. On occasion, the zit will become enflamed, but one does not stop squeezing or allow it to become an infection. Two questions: 1) Can you recall any terrorist organizations which have been snuffed out, and HOW they were snuffed out? |
bastards. Clearly, terror is a covert op if there ever was one.
Quote:
|
2) If terror should be crushed with more terror, what do you feel is the purpose of the intelligence agencies? To inflict said terror. They are not allowed to engage in covert operations |
#36
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:bdZYh.616$J54.114 (AT) trnddc04 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nKHYh.7414$B25.3763 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:hLtYh.845$KP1.150 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:H4rYh.7469$ya1.2791 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:w2rYh.1190$iR2.197 (AT) trnddc05 (DOT) .. Isn't that essentially the same message we got from al Qaeda in the first place? They said we didn't have the will to carry out a war against them in particular, or terror in general. Turns out they are right. With Dems at the helm, we are just a bunch of pussies that do nothing more than cry when we get sand kicked into our face. It's so much fun to watch us cry, they keep kicking the sand and we keep doing nothing. The Aussies are just repeating what the terrorists said. (I'm not meaning to denegrate the Aussies at all, I'm just saying they are repeating that which has already been said.) Given the realities of time, the prophecies of terrorists have become true. I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. You're obviously an expert at military strategy in general, and Iraq in particular. What would you do differently right now? I'm not sure what I would do, but what I wouldn't do is tell the rat-bastard terrorists that I was going to bring my troops home. Unfortunately, the one thing that will defeat terrorists does not serve a purpose that is far more important to politicians like President Rove. Decades of work by police and spooks will unravel terrorists. It's worked before, and it will continue to work. But, because this type of behind the scenes "war" isn't exciting (or visible), it doesn't provide erections for reborn children like Scott. If there are no erections, attention is lost, along with future votes. War gives Scott erections. The ONLY thing that terrorists understand is terror greater than the terror they inflict. The problem with that statement is that it demands civilized society behave in a more brutal manner than the peopel that attack them, and this is opposite of what civilized society would prefer to behave. The problem with that is, terrorists will always win because there will be an element of society that says everybody has a nice streak that we can exploit to make them better people. I'm from the element of society that says that if the nice streak turns ugly, you've blown your chance to be nice, and the only thing left to do is exterminate you. Terrorists are a zit on the ass of humanity. One does not sit around and wait for a zit to go away, one squeezes the zit and drains it. On occasion, the zit will become enflamed, but one does not stop squeezing or allow it to become an infection. I prefer to think of LIEberals and Terrorists as a boil on the buttocks of the world. What do you do with a boil? You lance it with a hot tool, of course. |
the ass takes fewer keystrokes.
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:fgZYh.617$J54.356 (AT) trnddc04 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:SKHYh.7504$ya1.4671 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:mOtYh.847$KP1.205 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "ToMh" <tlhumm (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1177701471.344626.42280 (AT) o40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com... On Apr 27, 10:12 am, "Jeff Strickland" <c... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. Bush had an open check and full support for this war for the last 4 years. Why didn't he just kick some ass and then come home? Funny how Georgie had complete control of this war for 4 years, now it's all the Democrats fault. How is that surge going? what a F*ckin joke Bush and his cronies are, and how quick they are to start shifting the blame, the only thing this administration has proved competent in. He doesn't have full support, that's the problem. He's been fighting the whiners from Day One. The French whine, the Chinese whine, the Russians pitch a fit. These are three key allies on the UN Security Council, and not one of them has lifted a finger to help. Indeed, they've expended far more energy NOT helping than in stepping up to the plate to pull their collective load. If you realized the force was sent to the wrong country, you'd whine, too. Actually, all three of those countries did not dispute the WMD claim, therefore they did not think it was the wrong country. Their beef was that the action was disproportionate to the offense, AND they had a huge financial stake in Saddam remaining in power -- consider the oil-for-food program where they each were going around the sanctions under the guise of the oil for food, and reaping huge sums of money in the process. You took an erroneous left turn. I was referring to our relative lack of presence in Afghanistan. Six weeks after 9/11, the CIA did a nice job of finding and purchasing locals who would work with us. Then, your president sent the bulk of our troops to the wrong place. If you've been following the news from Afghanistan, you would know we had dropped the ball. |
issues.
We felt/feel that Afghanistan is a government that can take care of itself,
and we are no longer required to maintain the presence in that country that
is needed in Iraq. OBL is not in Afghanistan, and he is not orchestrating
the events unfolding there. He is in either Pakistan or Iran, where he has
the support of the local tribes. These tribes say, "OBL who?"
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:UL%Yh.7479$B25.6339 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:fgZYh.617$J54.356 (AT) trnddc04 (DOT) .. "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:SKHYh.7504$ya1.4671 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote in message news:mOtYh.847$KP1.205 (AT) trnddc02 (DOT) .. "ToMh" <tlhumm (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1177701471.344626.42280 (AT) o40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com... On Apr 27, 10:12 am, "Jeff Strickland" <c... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote: I want a Dem to stand up and say, (paraphrasing here) enough of this shit, let's kick some sand-filled ass and then come home. That's a Dem I could stand behind. The Pelosi Dems are just a bunch of crying little kids running to mommy because they got a little dirty. Boo hoo. Crybabies. Bush had an open check and full support for this war for the last 4 years. Why didn't he just kick some ass and then come home? Funny how Georgie had complete control of this war for 4 years, now it's all the Democrats fault. How is that surge going? what a F*ckin joke Bush and his cronies are, and how quick they are to start shifting the blame, the only thing this administration has proved competent in. He doesn't have full support, that's the problem. He's been fighting the whiners from Day One. The French whine, the Chinese whine, the Russians pitch a fit. These are three key allies on the UN Security Council, and not one of them has lifted a finger to help. Indeed, they've expended far more energy NOT helping than in stepping up to the plate to pull their collective load. If you realized the force was sent to the wrong country, you'd whine, too. Actually, all three of those countries did not dispute the WMD claim, therefore they did not think it was the wrong country. Their beef was that the action was disproportionate to the offense, AND they had a huge financial stake in Saddam remaining in power -- consider the oil-for-food program where they each were going around the sanctions under the guise of the oil for food, and reaping huge sums of money in the process. You took an erroneous left turn. I was referring to our relative lack of presence in Afghanistan. Six weeks after 9/11, the CIA did a nice job of finding and purchasing locals who would work with us. Then, your president sent the bulk of our troops to the wrong place. If you've been following the news from Afghanistan, you would know we had dropped the ball. What we do/did in Afghanistan and what we do/did in Iraq are separate issues. We felt/feel that Afghanistan is a government that can take care of itself, and we are no longer required to maintain the presence in that country that is needed in Iraq. OBL is not in Afghanistan, and he is not orchestrating the events unfolding there. He is in either Pakistan or Iran, where he has the support of the local tribes. These tribes say, "OBL who?" |
Oh....I see. You're a funny guy.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.