AutosTalk Forums  

OT: For Cathy F

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss OT: For Cathy F in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81  
Old   
MaceFace
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: For Cathy F - 05-18-2007 , 03:14 AM







Hachiroku wrote:
Quote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:43:03 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

Just remember what Limbaugh said about his purpose. You know what he said,
right?


No. And that's not important.
You don't know what he said, but you know it's not important. You're
so much like a typical Rush Limbaugh fan and unlike BBC and NPR
listeners.



Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old   
JoeSpareBedroom
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: For Cathy F - 05-18-2007 , 07:22 AM






"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote

Quote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:17:56 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message
news:8W03i.21160$5Z6.2348 (AT) trndny05 (DOT) ..
On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:43:03 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

It makes all the difference in the world.

Not really, you could say the same for the BBC or NPR. They have their
biases, often just as bead as Limbaugh's. Don't try to tell me
otherwise; I listen to them *ALL*.


Just remember what Limbaugh said about his purpose. You know what he
said,
right?


No. And that's not important.



What Limbaugh says about his purpose is not important? You might be
shocked to know what he said. It's ugly, and you would agree.


Oh, you mean to entertain? Yeah, I knew that. He says it all the time.


To divide, actually. The exact opposite of what Reagan's worshippers say was
his best quality.




Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old   
JoeSpareBedroom
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: For Cathy F - 05-18-2007 , 12:53 PM



"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote

Quote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 23:52:53 -0700, MaceFace wrote:


Hachiroku wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:17:21 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

Now, let me pose this to you. Do you know why I started listening to
Limbaugh? Because he voiced MY opinions. Not the other way around.

Missed the part where I said I listen to NPR and the BBC?

I saw it, but you usually mention them in a demeaning way, because you
were told to say they were overly biased sources.

Who said that? They're ALL overly biased sources.

What's the right amount of bias, and specifically how and when have NPR
and BBC been biased?


Um...EVERY SINGLE DAY?!?!

You have GOT to be kidding me!!!!!!!!

Here's the list of stories from this morning's news show. Tell me which ones
are biased, and why. You didn't listen to it, but I'll expect you to guess.

http://www.npr.org/templates/rundown...wn.php?prgId=3




Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old   
JoeSpareBedroom
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: For Cathy F - 05-18-2007 , 12:54 PM



"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote

Quote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 11:22:13 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

What Limbaugh says about his purpose is not important? You might be
shocked to know what he said. It's ugly, and you would agree.


Oh, you mean to entertain? Yeah, I knew that. He says it all the time.



To divide, actually. The exact opposite of what Reagan's worshippers say
was his best quality.


I don't recall that. But I do recall Reagan trying to unite the country
and the Congress especially. Yes, it was his best quality, and it worked,
and WE worked.

If you're correct, and Rush adores Reagan so much, I wonder how come he
doesn't use Ronald's tack but insteads keeps trying to drive a wedge
between the two?


Here. Read what your mom says about himself:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=7018083

And, don't give me any bullshit about the story being biased. The words are
his, in print and in audio.




Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old   
JoeSpareBedroom
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: For Cathy F - 05-18-2007 , 04:22 PM



"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote

Quote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:53:23 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message
news:mPk3i.1374$Qz.1273 (AT) trndny09 (DOT) ..
On Thu, 17 May 2007 23:52:53 -0700, MaceFace wrote:


Hachiroku wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:17:21 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

Now, let me pose this to you. Do you know why I started listening to
Limbaugh? Because he voiced MY opinions. Not the other way around.

Missed the part where I said I listen to NPR and the BBC?

I saw it, but you usually mention them in a demeaning way, because
you were told to say they were overly biased sources.

Who said that? They're ALL overly biased sources.

What's the right amount of bias, and specifically how and when have NPR
and BBC been biased?


Um...EVERY SINGLE DAY?!?!

You have GOT to be kidding me!!!!!!!!


Here's the list of stories from this morning's news show. Tell me which
ones are biased, and why. You didn't listen to it, but I'll expect you to
guess.

http://www.npr.org/templates/rundown...wn.php?prgId=3


Read some of the quotes. In the immigration story, where is the other
side?


This one?
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=10251749




Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old   
Cathy F.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: For Cathy F - 05-18-2007 , 04:26 PM




"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote

Quote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:53:23 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message
news:mPk3i.1374$Qz.1273 (AT) trndny09 (DOT) ..
On Thu, 17 May 2007 23:52:53 -0700, MaceFace wrote:


Hachiroku wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:17:21 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

Now, let me pose this to you. Do you know why I started listening to
Limbaugh? Because he voiced MY opinions. Not the other way around.

Missed the part where I said I listen to NPR and the BBC?

I saw it, but you usually mention them in a demeaning way, because
you were told to say they were overly biased sources.

Who said that? They're ALL overly biased sources.

What's the right amount of bias, and specifically how and when have NPR
and BBC been biased?


Um...EVERY SINGLE DAY?!?!

You have GOT to be kidding me!!!!!!!!


Here's the list of stories from this morning's news show. Tell me which
ones are biased, and why. You didn't listen to it, but I'll expect you to
guess.

http://www.npr.org/templates/rundown...wn.php?prgId=3


Read some of the quotes. In the immigration story, where is the other
side?
I heard the immigation story - well, part of it - on the drive to work this
morning. They presented pros & cons - what each side feels are its good
points & its deficits.

Cathy


Quote:




Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old   
JoeSpareBedroom
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: For Cathy F - 05-18-2007 , 05:50 PM



"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote

Quote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:26:51 -0400, Cathy F. wrote:


"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message
news:NRn3i.2098$Qz.667 (AT) trndny09 (DOT) ..
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:53:23 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message
news:mPk3i.1374$Qz.1273 (AT) trndny09 (DOT) ..
On Thu, 17 May 2007 23:52:53 -0700, MaceFace wrote:


Hachiroku wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:17:21 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

Now, let me pose this to you. Do you know why I started listening to
Limbaugh? Because he voiced MY opinions. Not the other way around.

Missed the part where I said I listen to NPR and the BBC?

I saw it, but you usually mention them in a demeaning way, because
you were told to say they were overly biased sources.

Who said that? They're ALL overly biased sources.

What's the right amount of bias, and specifically how and when have
NPR and BBC been biased?


Um...EVERY SINGLE DAY?!?!

You have GOT to be kidding me!!!!!!!!


Here's the list of stories from this morning's news show. Tell me which
ones are biased, and why. You didn't listen to it, but I'll expect you
to guess.

http://www.npr.org/templates/rundown...wn.php?prgId=3


Read some of the quotes. In the immigration story, where is the other
side?

I heard the immigation story - well, part of it - on the drive to work
this morning. They presented pros & cons - what each side feels are its
good points & its deficits.

Cathy

But only quoted Ted Kennedy and an AFL-CIO leader who would *LOVE* to have
all those new Union workers.



The article looked pretty balanced to me, considering how little time they
have to put these things together. But, I know you're an Expert Writer, so
why don't you tell us what you think was Missing?




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.