![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
n5hsr wrote: Man the Dims really do want to replay Vietnam, don't they? Ironic, considering it's right-wing idiots who got us into this mess in the first place. |
|
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And the Dims never seem to learn. Learn what, exactly? That right-wing filth are stupid, selfish bastards who are prone to fuck-up royally? Car bombs blowing-up all over Baghdad. Roaming death squads. The blood of innocents everywhere. America in a quagmire. Good job, George! |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
n5hsr wrote: Sorry, the replay began when the Dims chickensh!ted out, just like they did in 1968. The Dims are the party of Chickensh!t Sorry, you're a lying asshole and an evil piece of shit. Typical, for a right-winger. This is YOUR WAR, CHARLES. YOUR PARTY was in charge, you fucking piece of SHIT! Sheesh! It's the "dims fault" that Iraq is a disaster. Sheesh again! "Mission accomplished", even! |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
"dizzy" <dizzy (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:tabk23d4nf7ihiifmghhlbutdg6oaoi4me (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... n5hsr wrote: Man the Dims really do want to replay Vietnam, don't they? Ironic, considering it's right-wing idiots who got us into this mess in the first place. I think you got it wrong. It should be right-wing idiot (GWB). |
|
--I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things. -- GW Bush (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0030604-3.html) Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And the Dims never seem to learn. Learn what, exactly? That right-wing filth are stupid, selfish bastards who are prone to fuck-up royally? Car bombs blowing-up all over Baghdad. Roaming death squads. The blood of innocents everywhere. America in a quagmire. Good job, George! |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <eeqWh.1084$Wa.80@trnddc08>, "Truckdude" <shrub (AT) thedeecider (DOT) com> wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-7E484A.20193120042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <462946ec$0$16387$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com>, "dh" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message news:qbcWh.54$Rd.45 (AT) trndny08 (DOT) .. On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:12:18 -0500, n5hsr wrote: 'Twas bad enough when he said the war in Iraq was lost. Man the Dims really do want to replay Vietnam, don't they? Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And the Dims never seem to learn. He didn't say the war was lost. He said Al Queda was winning. There is a difference. And he's an Idiot. Nope. He's exactly right. We GAVE Al-Qaeda the upper hand when we invaded. There was no earthly reason for it and we did it, anyway. We GAVE Al-Qaeda a training ground for terrorists and a cause to bring in new ones. Saddam was no threat to the US but we invaded, anyway. All the while, the real criminal has gone scot-free. Bush is the idiot. He acted on the best information he had at the time, given what happened on 9/11. bullshit and you know it! You seem to think the world is at peace until GWB came along, that is not true. Terrorism has been building for many years, culminating on 9/11 with the killing of about 3000 innocent citizens. which had nothing to do with Saddam or Iraq. remember a guy called bin Laden? I know you are very partisan and that is why you take the position that GWB is an idiot. He beat the best the democrats had and I know it must hurt you profoundly. Tough shit. -- the great thing is that people have finally woken up to reality and aren't buying the Bush admin. line of crap anymore But you were say basically the same stuff before we even went to Iraq. No, your motives are beyond Iraq. Have a nice day. -- |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <462946ec$0$16387$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com>, "dh" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote: He said Al Queda was winning. There is a difference. And he's an Idiot. Nope. He's exactly right. We GAVE Al-Qaeda the upper hand when we invaded. There was no earthly reason for it and we did it, anyway. We GAVE Al-Qaeda a training ground for terrorists and a cause to bring in new ones. Saddam was no threat to the US but we invaded, anyway. All the while, the real criminal has gone scot-free. Bush is the idiot. He acted on the best information he had at the time, given what happened on 9/11. You seem to think the world is at peace until GWB came along, that is not true. Terrorism has been building for many years, culminating on 9/11 with the killing of about 3000 innocent citizens. I know you are very partisan and that is why you take the position that GWB is an idiot. He beat the best the democrats had and I know it must hurt you profoundly. Tough shit. |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
He acted on the best information he had at the time, given what happened on 9/11. You seem to think the world is at peace until GWB came along, that is not true. Terrorism has been building for many years, culminating on 9/11 with the killing of about 3000 innocent citizens. I know you are very partisan and that is why you take the position that GWB is an idiot. He beat the best the democrats had and I know it must hurt you profoundly. Tough shit. "dh" is exactly right, about Bush being an idiot. But he omitted the important qualifier.... Bush is an evil idiot. The typical village idiot is a benign sort of fool who skips around the town square singing nonsense lyrics to songs in his head. Bush plans to hang around for the next year and a half doing nothing to save our troops from death, and the civilians in Iraq from death, knowing that once the Democratic president arrives in Jan. 2009, the burden will be on his shoulders, and Bush can then say "The US didn't cut and run from Iraq on MY watch!" An evil idiot with no idea that he'll be vilified in the history books twenty years from now. And mark my words, he Will Be Vilified. |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
|
PS, please don't hold back. Tell us what you really think of Charles. |
#28
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message news:qbcWh.54$Rd.45 (AT) trndny08 (DOT) .. On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:12:18 -0500, n5hsr wrote: 'Twas bad enough when he said the war in Iraq was lost. Man the Dims really do want to replay Vietnam, don't they? Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And the Dims never seem to learn. He didn't say the war was lost. He said Al Queda was winning. There is a difference. And he's an Idiot. Nope. He's exactly right. We GAVE Al-Qaeda the upper hand when we invaded. There was no earthly reason for it and we did it, anyway. We GAVE Al-Qaeda a training ground for terrorists and a cause to bring in new ones. Saddam was no threat to the US but we invaded, anyway. All the while, the real criminal has gone scot-free. Bush is the idiot. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
What's wrong with nukes? I love the sight of mushroom clouds in the Middle East... IMO, that is just plain sick. |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
n5hsr wrote: Man the Dims really do want to replay Vietnam, don't they? Ironic, considering it's right-wing idiots who got us into this mess in the first place. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And the Dims never seem to learn. Learn what, exactly? That right-wing filth are stupid, selfish bastards who are prone to fuck-up royally? Car bombs blowing-up all over Baghdad. Roaming death squads. The blood of innocents everywhere. America in a quagmire. Good job, George! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |