 | |
{OT}: Dingy Harry strikes again
Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: {OT}: Dingy Harry strikes again -
04-21-2007
, 05:24 PM
|
n5hsr wrote: Sorry, the replay began when the Dims chickensh!ted out, just like they did in 1968. The Dims are the party of Chickensh!t Sorry, you're a lying asshole and an evil piece of shit. Typical, for a right-winger. This is YOUR WAR, CHARLES. YOUR PARTY was in charge, you fucking piece of SHIT! Sheesh! It's the "dims fault" that Iraq is a disaster. Sheesh again! "Mission accomplished", even! |
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
"dizzy" <dizzy (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:9hbk23d981ueicao6bl0fnetmp6j64lhm2 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Sheesh! It's the "dims fault" that Iraq is a disaster. Sheesh again! "Mission accomplished", even! Who said, "Mission accomplished?" Whoever that was was not very analytical, was he? Jeff |
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
"mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote in message news:132kevu9llg8a41 (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com... ... He acted on the best information he had at the time, given what happened on 9/11. You seem to think the world is at peace until GWB came along, that is not true. Terrorism has been building for many years, culminating on 9/11 with the killing of about 3000 innocent citizens. I know you are very partisan and that is why you take the position that GWB is an idiot. He beat the best the democrats had and I know it must hurt you profoundly. Tough shit. "dh" is exactly right, about Bush being an idiot. But he omitted the important qualifier.... Bush is an evil idiot. The typical village idiot is a benign sort of fool who skips around the town square singing nonsense lyrics to songs in his head. Bush plans to hang around for the next year and a half doing nothing to save our troops from death, and the civilians in Iraq from death, knowing that once the Democratic president arrives in Jan. 2009, the burden will be on his shoulders, and Bush can then say "The US didn't cut and run from Iraq on MY watch!" An evil idiot with no idea that he'll be vilified in the history books twenty years from now. And mark my words, he Will Be Vilified. I don't think Bush is an evil idiot. Unfortunately, Bush doesn't have the type of curiosity that a President needs. For example, he should have asked questions before going into Iraq like, 1) Are the intelligence reports really accurate? 2) Are we prepared to win the peace after I land on an aircraft carrier and declare, "Mission accomplished?" 3) About 95% of the countries in the world are against us going into Iraq, including the French, whom we fought with in WWII. Why? A lot of US citizens are protesting going into Iraq. Could the vast majority be right and could I be wrong? Bush said, "I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things." This was in 2003. One has to ask why so many people voted for Bush in 2004. Then one has to ask: Who are the real idiots? http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0030604-3.html Jeff |
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
Cathy F., 4/21/2007,1:18:05 PM, wrote: What's wrong with nukes? I love the sight of mushroom clouds in the Middle East... IMO, that is just plain sick. It is so easy to yank your string... |
his many past "Nuke e'm" and "Blam, blam" (this latter one possibly
paraphrased) comments.
Cathy
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
Nobody said it, it was on the banner placed by the grew of the carrier. It referred to the completion of the units six month mission in mid east waters. That fact was explained in the media, but of course that makes no difference to the Dims or the kooks mike "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:AfqWh.573$nR1.514 (AT) trnddc06 (DOT) .. "dizzy" <dizzy (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:9hbk23d981ueicao6bl0fnetmp6j64lhm2 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Sheesh! It's the "dims fault" that Iraq is a disaster. Sheesh again! "Mission accomplished", even! Who said, "Mission accomplished?" Whoever that was was not very analytical, was he? Jeff |
#36
| |||
| |||
|
|
Nobody said it, it was on the banner placed by the grew of the carrier. It referred to the completion of the units six month mission in mid east waters. That fact was explained in the media, but of course that makes no difference to the Dims or the kooks mike |
face only by a staunch repuglicant ...or Baron Munchausen! Total nonsense.
Funny how dated that banner is now.....as is Bush's flight suit heroics.
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
The more the lefty kooks post the goofier they get! Can we assume you are not a history major DIZZY LOL mike And YOU are, Mike? You would make me laugh, but I don't like laughing at |
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hoping people have forgotten that the White House admitted (eventually and reluctantly) that it provided the banner? Your version doesn't wash there, Mikey! |
The mission of the ship was accomplished.
--
Scott in Florida
#39
| |||
| |||
|
|
Nobody said it, it was on the banner placed by the grew of the carrier. It referred to the completion of the units six month mission in mid east waters. That fact was explained in the media, but of course that makes no difference to the Dims or the kooks |
celebrate the completion of the mission in Iraq.
He began: "Admiral Kelly, Captain Card, officers and sailors of the USS
Abraham Lincoln, my fellow Americans, major combat operations in Iraq have
ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have
prevailed."
A big Oopsie.
He clearly indicated that more work has to be done in Iraq. But, he was also
claiming that the war was over. He didn't talk about his strategy to win the
peace. As far as I can tell, he didn't have one.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/05/01/bush.transcript/
Jeff
Quote:
|
mike "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:AfqWh.573$nR1.514 (AT) trnddc06 (DOT) .. "dizzy" <dizzy (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:9hbk23d981ueicao6bl0fnetmp6j64lhm2 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Sheesh! It's the "dims fault" that Iraq is a disaster. Sheesh again! "Mission accomplished", even! Who said, "Mission accomplished?" Whoever that was was not very analytical, was he? Jeff |
#40
| |||
| |||
|
|
Are your really that naive? |
Do you really want a President who is not analytical?
Jeff
Quote:
|
mike "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xrrWh.155$1M1.137 (AT) trnddc01 (DOT) .. "mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote in message news:132kevu9llg8a41 (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com... ... He acted on the best information he had at the time, given what happened on 9/11. You seem to think the world is at peace until GWB came along, that is not true. Terrorism has been building for many years, culminating on 9/11 with the killing of about 3000 innocent citizens. I know you are very partisan and that is why you take the position that GWB is an idiot. He beat the best the democrats had and I know it must hurt you profoundly. Tough shit. "dh" is exactly right, about Bush being an idiot. But he omitted the important qualifier.... Bush is an evil idiot. The typical village idiot is a benign sort of fool who skips around the town square singing nonsense lyrics to songs in his head. Bush plans to hang around for the next year and a half doing nothing to save our troops from death, and the civilians in Iraq from death, knowing that once the Democratic president arrives in Jan. 2009, the burden will be on his shoulders, and Bush can then say "The US didn't cut and run from Iraq on MY watch!" An evil idiot with no idea that he'll be vilified in the history books twenty years from now. And mark my words, he Will Be Vilified. I don't think Bush is an evil idiot. Unfortunately, Bush doesn't have the type of curiosity that a President needs. For example, he should have asked questions before going into Iraq like, 1) Are the intelligence reports really accurate? 2) Are we prepared to win the peace after I land on an aircraft carrier and declare, "Mission accomplished?" 3) About 95% of the countries in the world are against us going into Iraq, including the French, whom we fought with in WWII. Why? A lot of US citizens are protesting going into Iraq. Could the vast majority be right and could I be wrong? Bush said, "I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things." This was in 2003. One has to ask why so many people voted for Bush in 2004. Then one has to ask: Who are the real idiots? http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0030604-3.html Jeff |
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.