![]() | |
#91
| |||
| |||
|
|
JoeSpareBedroom, 5/20/2007,9:47:01 AM, wrote: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xn0f6f7ea3iwfom000 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net... tak, 5/19/2007,10:57:12 PM, wrote: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xn0f6ef862xv7oy003 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net... Cathy F., 5/19/2007,8:48:33 PM, wrote: And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Then they probably deserve it. That logic applies in spades to the current president, who has done nothing well in his two terms except to get elected, by hook or by crook. The work of administration of a large and powerful country doesn't seem to interest him at all judging by the record to date. He's done well to prevent more attacks within the US. He's eliminated thousands of terrorists and messed up their financial networks. Focus on this: "In Iraq..." Now: In Iraq, what were all these terrorists doing before we invaded? Why didn't we hear about these thousands of terrorists? They were scattered around the world. Many are gathered there now and are being eliminated. |
#92
| |||
| |||
|
|
JoeSpareBedroom, 5/20/2007,12:28:07 PM, wrote: What if the next president is found to be having sex in the oval office, with his/her spouse? Which one is the boss? |
#93
| |||
| |||
|
|
dizzy, 5/20/2007,6:00:35 PM, wrote: badgolferman wrote: dizzy, 5/19/2007,6:55:59 PM, wrote: Politicians usually do not flame each other. What they say in public >> regarding how they may feel about another leader has very little to do >> with how they really feel inside. Why do the Democrat Senators have such derogatory terms and descriptions about the Executive Branch politicians? Political adversaries will flame each other, obviously, but that's not the context of this discussion. One head of state (or anyone "high on the ladder") will (essentially) never publicly flame another head of state. Pretty much never, when the two countries in question are close allies. There's nothing to be gained by it, and much to lose. Put your brain in gear. Blair, like every intelligent, informed, person, knows that Bush is a mediocre man and a lackey of the wealthy-elite. It's more than obvious. It isn't obvious to me. If he thought Bush was a moron he would just avoid him. Obviously he knows something you don't. |
|
-- "Bill Clinton's foreign policy experience is pretty much limited to having had breakfast once at the International House of Pancakes." ~ Pat Buchanan |
#94
| |||
| |||
|
|
dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom: We don't bash the president as you do. Liar. You've made plenty of cheap shots against Clinton, even after he was out of office, only yours were false. |
#95
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <A744i.8826$B25.7039 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny>, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xn0f6fq8n48g10a002 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net... JoeSpareBedroom, 5/20/2007,12:28:07 PM, wrote: What if the next president is found to be having sex in the oval office, with his/her spouse? Which one is the boss? We'll wait for dbu to answer the question. Here it is again, in case he pretends he doesn't see it: What if the next president is found to be having sex in the oval office, with his/her spouse? jsb with another stupid anology to fit his weak defense of clintoon and his rape of an intern which he got away with, the lucky bastard. |
#96
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <Ud6dnSkuiNg1Vs3b4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-83006D.16074320052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <YIednQMhQYgtHM3b4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-85B336.11183820052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <k_-dnWWMtcZJB9Lb4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-A9DEE4.19221319052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article 1179617201.280205.185920 (AT) h2g200...oglegroups.com>, larry moe 'n curly <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote: dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom: We don't bash the president as you do. Liar. You've made plenty of cheap shots against Clinton, even after he was out of office, only yours were false. Clinton's not the president my dear boy. And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Cathy If I don't like him/her just as you don't like Bush, then yes I will do the same type and amount of bitching and moaning, bashing just as you and those of your ilk do to Bush. So there. Exactly. So... you don't see a double standard in place?? Cathy You assume that you or I would be right. Not having ALL the information at hand, then we can only bitch and complain, just as GI's bitch and complain about the chow. I will be bitching and complaining about hillary IF she wins and you will be defending her, right? I frankly don't understand where you're getting this "double standard" from. I really don't think you are on the same wavelength. Sigh... you complain that people who dislike GWB's policies bitch & moan, berating the president. Comment earlier in this thread, quoted above: "We don't bash the president as you do." However, if the tables turn w/the '08 election, will you then defend your own right to bitch & moan about a Democrat in office, "bashing" a president whose policies you don't agree with? (Ignore that dangling preposition!) Cathy Sigh, We don't because you don't have a bum for president, yet. I hope it never happens either. clintoon was the last bum. |
|
-- "I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the President." Hillary Clinton |
#97
| |||
| |||
|
|
Sigh, We don't because you don't have a bum for president, yet. I hope it never happens either. clintoon was the last bum. |
#98
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
In article <W4ydnXaOub3HQ83b4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: Jeez, you *still* haven't answered the question. Cathy You don't get it do ya. I'll be here till hell freezes over. If you are trying to drive me away |
|
you are wasting you freeking |
|
time woman. I don't give a damn if you're a teacher or a bag lady. I don't answer to you. |
|
Take a hike. |
#99
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 19 May 2007 16:26:41 -0700, larry moe 'n curly larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote: dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom: We don't bash the president as you do. Liar. You've made plenty of cheap shots against Clinton, even after he was out of office, only yours were false. Everything derogatory about Clintoon is true. We are being very nice to that rat basturd.... -- Scott in Florida Well, by that notion, we've been more than kind to Shrub and his attacks |
#100
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <Zz54i.8832$B25.4582 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny>, "tak" <takirch (AT) frontiernet (DOT) net> wrote: Well, by that notion, we've been more than kind to Shrub and his attacks against America. Who is "Shrub"? |
|
How did "Shrub" attack America, please explain. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |