OT: Hell now slightly more crowded

#**131**

dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom

Quote:

In article <8lg4i.8846$B25.7170 (AT) news01 (DOT) roc.ny>,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

So Hillary knew there were Al Qaeda in Iraq, my my my. She also said
that sadam will continue to INCREASE his capacity to wage WMD warfare,
well my my my. She also says he will keep trying to develop nuclear
weapons. So GWB was not alone, in fact the hillary was right there lock
step.

The most likely reason Hillary voted for the war resolution was
because she was ambitious and didn't want to offend popular opinion
and seem unpatriotic. It's also possible, but unlikely, that she
voted for it because she trusted GW Bush (after all, what US president
would lie about Iraq having WMDs or ties to al Qaeda if it wasn't
true?) or because she wanted to give his threat of war enough clout to
cause Saddam to back down and let UN weapons inspectors back in.

Quote:

Thankfully we have a president who removed this threat without
concern for his own political welfare

If he truly didn't care about his own political welfare he would have
sent in at least 500,000 soldiers. But he knew that such a large
number would require a draft, and he didn't want to risk losing votes
over that.

Quote:

like some of the other weak politicans that change their spots
when the going gets rough.

It's definitely better to keep plowing on with a military force far
too small for victory, but that's the Chicken George way of fighting
(with other lives).

#**132**

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

JoeSpareBedroom, 5/21/2007,7:35:19 PM, wrote:

"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1179790314.923885.303120 (AT) b40g2000prd (DOT) googlegroups.com...

badgolferman wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom, 5/20/2007,6:38:55 PM, wrote:

Have you heard of the so-called "special relationship", in
exactly > those >>> words?

What's a "special relationship"? Is that like same-sex marriages?

It's like the relationship that former President George Bush has
with his favorite son, Bill Clinton.

Can you believe golf boy's never heard the term, in a historical
context? It's unbelievable.

Hey golf boy - how old are you? How many years have gone by without
your reading one single history book that mentions this crucial thing
about our country?

I'm old enough to be able to see right through you.

A nonsensical answer. How have you missed this important aspect of our
history? This is especially unfortunate since the history overlaps your
lifetime, and is directly related to the reasons for our presence in various
foreign policy toilets around the world.

#**133**

Naturally we would not expect you to have your facts correct but if you
want to educate yourself for a change, do a search for the information
available to the Brits, the UN and the rest of the world. You can not
continue to use the kook lefty bloges and web site as you source of
information, unless you actually want to continue to look like a fool every
time you post something.
..

mike

"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Cathy F. wrote:

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:xn0f6fq6v48dgji000 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net...

It isn't obvious to me. If he thought Bush was a moron he would just
avoid him. Obviously he knows something you don't.

I think he became pals w/GWB early on, was swayed in regard to Iraq (for
reasons unknown to me), but in the last couple of years has most likely
been
kicking himself, muttering, "Dumb, dumb, -dumb- move." Being allied
w/GWB
re: the War in Iraq certainly didn't enhance his image at home.

Maybe Blair trusted GW Bush on Iraq the same way DeGaulle trusted
Kennedy on the Cuban missile crisis -- an American president would
always tell the truth to a close ally.

#**134**

The more the lefty kooks post, the goofier they get LOL

mike

"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom

Quote:

Thankfully we have a president who removed this threat without
concern for his own political welfare

If he truly didn't care about his own political welfare he would have
sent in at least 500,000 soldiers. But he knew that such a large
number would require a draft, and he didn't want to risk losing votes
over that.

like some of the other weak politicans that change their spots
when the going gets rough.

It's definitely better to keep plowing on with a military force far
too small for victory, but that's the Chicken George way of fighting
(with other lives).

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

OT: Hell now slightly more crowded

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)

Re: OT: Hell now slightly more crowded - 05-22-2007 , 12:23 AM

Re: OT: Hell now slightly more crowded - 05-22-2007 , 07:29 AM

Re: OT: The lefty kooks will go to Hell - 05-22-2007 , 09:56 AM

Re: OT: Hell now slightly more crowded - 05-22-2007 , 09:58 AM