 | |
OT: Hell now slightly more crowded
Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#81
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: OT: Hell now slightly more crowded -
05-20-2007
, 09:47 AM
|
tak, 5/19/2007,10:57:12 PM, wrote: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xn0f6ef862xv7oy003 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net... Cathy F., 5/19/2007,8:48:33 PM, wrote: And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Then they probably deserve it. That logic applies in spades to the current president, who has done nothing well in his two terms except to get elected, by hook or by crook. The work of administration of a large and powerful country doesn't seem to interest him at all judging by the record to date. He's done well to prevent more attacks within the US. He's eliminated thousands of terrorists and messed up their financial networks. |
Focus on this: "In Iraq..."
Now:
In Iraq, what were all these terrorists doing before we invaded? Why didn't
we hear about these thousands of terrorists?
#82
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <k_-dnWWMtcZJB9Lb4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-A9DEE4.19221319052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <1179617201.280205.185920 (AT) h2g2000hsg (DOT) googlegroups.com>, larry moe 'n curly <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote: dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom: We don't bash the president as you do. Liar. You've made plenty of cheap shots against Clinton, even after he was out of office, only yours were false. Clinton's not the president my dear boy. And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Cathy If I don't like him/her just as you don't like Bush, then yes I will do the same type and amount of bitching and moaning, bashing just as you and those of your ilk do to Bush. So there. |
What if the next president is found to be having sex in the oval office,
with his/her spouse?
#83
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <k_-dnWWMtcZJB9Lb4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-A9DEE4.19221319052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <1179617201.280205.185920 (AT) h2g2000hsg (DOT) googlegroups.com>, larry moe 'n curly <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote: dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom: We don't bash the president as you do. Liar. You've made plenty of cheap shots against Clinton, even after he was out of office, only yours were false. Clinton's not the president my dear boy. And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Cathy If I don't like him/her just as you don't like Bush, then yes I will do the same type and amount of bitching and moaning, bashing just as you and those of your ilk do to Bush. So there. |
Cathy
Quote:
|
-- "I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the President." Hillary Clinton |
#84
| |||
| |||
|
|
" dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-85B336.11183820052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <k_-dnWWMtcZJB9Lb4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-A9DEE4.19221319052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <1179617201.280205.185920 (AT) h2g2000hsg (DOT) googlegroups.com>, larry moe 'n curly <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote: dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom: We don't bash the president as you do. Liar. You've made plenty of cheap shots against Clinton, even after he was out of office, only yours were false. Clinton's not the president my dear boy. And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Cathy If I don't like him/her just as you don't like Bush, then yes I will do the same type and amount of bitching and moaning, bashing just as you and those of your ilk do to Bush. So there. Exactly. So... you don't see a double standard in place?? Cathy Double Standard? These posters can see no wrong with GWB and no good in any |
view the record of any president, everything seems to morph into their
needed point of view, Biased as it is.
Quote:
|
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the President." Hillary Clinton |
#85
| |||
| |||
|
|
dizzy, 5/19/2007,6:55:59 PM, wrote: Politicians usually do not flame each other. What they say in public regarding how they may feel about another leader has very little to do with how they really feel inside. Why do the Democrat Senators have such derogatory terms and descriptions about the Executive Branch politicians? |
the context of this discussion.
One head of state (or anyone "high on the ladder") will (essentially)
never publicly flame another head of state. Pretty much never, when
the two countries in question are close allies. There's nothing to be
gained by it, and much to lose.
Put your brain in gear. Blair, like every intelligent, informed,
person, knows that Bush is a mediocre man and a lackey of the
wealthy-elite. It's more than obvious.
#86
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <YIednQMhQYgtHM3b4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-85B336.11183820052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <k_-dnWWMtcZJB9Lb4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote: " dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:nsp-A9DEE4.19221319052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <1179617201.280205.185920 (AT) h2g2000hsg (DOT) googlegroups.com>, larry moe 'n curly <larrymoencurly (AT) my-deja (DOT) com> wrote: dbu., wrote to JoeSpareBedroom: We don't bash the president as you do. Liar. You've made plenty of cheap shots against Clinton, even after he was out of office, only yours were false. Clinton's not the president my dear boy. And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Cathy If I don't like him/her just as you don't like Bush, then yes I will do the same type and amount of bitching and moaning, bashing just as you and those of your ilk do to Bush. So there. Exactly. So... you don't see a double standard in place?? Cathy You assume that you or I would be right. Not having ALL the information at hand, then we can only bitch and complain, just as GI's bitch and complain about the chow. I will be bitching and complaining about hillary IF she wins and you will be defending her, right? I frankly don't understand where you're getting this "double standard" from. I really don't think you are on the same wavelength. |
berating the president. Comment earlier in this thread, quoted above: "We
don't bash the president as you do."
However, if the tables turn w/the '08 election, will you then defend your
own right to bitch & moan about a Democrat in office, "bashing" a president
whose policies you don't agree with? (Ignore that dangling preposition!)
Cathy
#87
| |||
| |||
|
|
badgolferman wrote: dizzy, 5/19/2007,6:55:59 PM, wrote: Politicians usually do not flame each other. What they say in public >> regarding how they may feel about another leader has very little to do >> with how they really feel inside. Why do the Democrat Senators have such derogatory terms and descriptions about the Executive Branch politicians? Political adversaries will flame each other, obviously, but that's not the context of this discussion. One head of state (or anyone "high on the ladder") will (essentially) never publicly flame another head of state. Pretty much never, when the two countries in question are close allies. There's nothing to be gained by it, and much to lose. Put your brain in gear. Blair, like every intelligent, informed, person, knows that Bush is a mediocre man and a lackey of the wealthy-elite. It's more than obvious. |
avoid him. Obviously he knows something you don't.
--
"Bill Clinton's foreign policy experience is pretty much limited to
having had breakfast once at the International House of Pancakes." ~
Pat Buchanan
#88
| |||
| |||
|
|
"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xn0f6f7ea3iwfom000 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net... tak, 5/19/2007,10:57:12 PM, wrote: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xn0f6ef862xv7oy003 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net... Cathy F., 5/19/2007,8:48:33 PM, wrote: And what happens if a Democrat is elected in '08, and you start bitching & moaning, bashing him or her?? Then they probably deserve it. That logic applies in spades to the current president, who has done nothing well in his two terms except to get elected, by hook or by crook. The work of administration of a large and powerful country doesn't seem to interest him at all judging by the record to date. He's done well to prevent more attacks within the US. He's eliminated thousands of terrorists and messed up their financial networks. Focus on this: "In Iraq..." Now: In Iraq, what were all these terrorists doing before we invaded? Why didn't we hear about these thousands of terrorists? |
are being eliminated.
--
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere,
diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." ~ Groucho
Marx
#89
| |||
| |||
|
|
What if the next president is found to be having sex in the oval office, with his/her spouse? |
#90
| |||
| |||
|
|
dizzy, 5/20/2007,6:00:35 PM, wrote: badgolferman wrote: dizzy, 5/19/2007,6:55:59 PM, wrote: Politicians usually do not flame each other. What they say in public >> regarding how they may feel about another leader has very little to do >> with how they really feel inside. Why do the Democrat Senators have such derogatory terms and descriptions about the Executive Branch politicians? Political adversaries will flame each other, obviously, but that's not the context of this discussion. One head of state (or anyone "high on the ladder") will (essentially) never publicly flame another head of state. Pretty much never, when the two countries in question are close allies. There's nothing to be gained by it, and much to lose. Put your brain in gear. Blair, like every intelligent, informed, person, knows that Bush is a mediocre man and a lackey of the wealthy-elite. It's more than obvious. It isn't obvious to me. If he thought Bush was a moron he would just avoid him. Obviously he knows something you don't. |
He knows he may need us in the future. That's it. End of story. Have you
heard of the so-called "special relationship", in exactly those words?
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.