![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <hQoWh.2098$no.653@trnddc02>, "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-7FA55E.08573321042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <P5idnYtKraT8YrTbnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: If all my talk about dimmers has upset your stomach, I'm sorry dbu. Where in heavens sake did you get that idea? I am just trying to educate you. You are education us. On how people, such as yourself, who don't have a clue and are totally misinformed can draw such stupid conclusion. You're proving the old computer adage: garbage in, garbage out. Jeff Jeff, your constant rubbish talk about GWB our President and Iraq as told to you by your puppet masters is enough to make a maggot regurgitate. |
|
I can only assume you are narrow minded, and an easily led minion of the far left wing extremists, moveon.org and others. |
|
-- |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
"mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote in message news:AIudnckA65MjebTbnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... snipped Don't use dimmers. They generate globs of RFI. Some brands are better than others but they are all dirty. -- Radio Frequency Interference? As far as I can tell, dimmers haven't been a problem. Light fixture/motion detector combo units (screw detector in first and then screw light bulb into detector) caused verifiable interference with my FAX/phone unit and another telecommunication piece of equipment. Like I said, dimmers haven't been a problem. As a matter of fact, every single GE and Phillips sunlight spectrum incandescent that's connected to the dimmers have lasted longer than any fluorescents. Dimmers extend longevity. I understand there's a finite limit of tungsten, so finding a good substitute ahead of time isn't unreasonable. What is unreasonable is for the government to get everyone excited about digital TV, and yet so far they use many more times the amount of electricity than a typical CRT. And for every watt that produces heat it takes two watts to cool. Some politicians may think they are showing and advocating, but it's from the heart and not the mind. Are you still with me or did I lose you after the first sentence? Bruce B is a lot more knowledgeable about this subject than I am, but I'lll give it a shot anyway. The motion detector probably causes interference because it is transmitting a signal that some other electronic devices pick up. My understanding is that dimmers extend the life of incandescent bulbs because they reduce the voltage to the bulbs, so they produce less heat and light, which extends the life of the filaments. Someone once suggested that using bulbs rated for 240 volts would last longer because they are effectively working at half of their rated voltage in household use. |
|
-- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply) |
#23
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
In article <F0qWh.569$nR1.70@trnddc06>, "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com wrote: Assuming makes an ass out of you. More accurately, you make an ass out of yourself. --"I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things." G.W. Bush, June 4, 2003 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...030604-3.html). So we have a President who makes decisiosn that affect millions of lives, including the lives of countries that we invade, and he doesn't think about why he does things. I think that, and the fact that you susport this asshole, says it all. Jeff You are more guilty of assuming things than I am. Where is the open mindedness of the liberal? Can't stand to have someone disagree with you? |
|
You think your ideas are the only right ones? |
|
Again, you are just a narrow minded minion with blinders. |
|
-- |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <mhqWh.574$nR1.525@trnddc06>, "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-D5BB33.10372821042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <F0qWh.569$nR1.70@trnddc06>, "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com wrote: Assuming makes an ass out of you. More accurately, you make an ass out of yourself. --"I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things." G.W. Bush, June 4, 2003 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...030604-3.html). So we have a President who makes decisiosn that affect millions of lives, including the lives of countries that we invade, and he doesn't think about why he does things. I think that, and the fact that you susport this asshole, says it all. Jeff You are more guilty of assuming things than I am. Where is the open mindedness of the liberal? Can't stand to have someone disagree with you? You're welcome to disagree with me. So is anyone else. You think your ideas are the only right ones? No, I don't. And they sometimes turn out to be wrong. Again, you are just a narrow minded minion with blinders. At least I am able to analyze myself. Even Bush says he is not analtyical. His comments confirm this. Jeff -- Have a nice day jeff. -- |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
I would like to point out something I learned recently from my electrician when I told him my florescent tubes were failing prematurely. He said the tubes must be kept on. (Left, instead of kept, if you like) |
|
I use toggle wall dimmers in certain rooms and it took much effort to educate the rest of the family as to the hazards of substituting fluorescents I had in stock for the burned out incandescent. Will they remember? I'm not about to spring for the even more expensive fluorescents that can handle variable power. |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <WsadndUY34TtnrTbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: What do you think of this attempt in Congress to ban incandescent light bulbs? I think it's a shame those who are pushing for it haven't done their homework. Will we have to apply for an exemption 30-60 days before Christmas? Will we have to forego a light bulb in the microwave oven? I think we're being LED down the wrong path I tell ya. This is part of the global warming panic, set up by none other than algore and his cheap flick. Right ...that's the movie all right. The one you wouldn't see because |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <_9aWh.7141$ya1.1995 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-B756BF.16160320042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <WsadndUY34TtnrTbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: What do you think of this attempt in Congress to ban incandescent light bulbs? I think it's a shame those who are pushing for it haven't done their homework. Will we have to apply for an exemption 30-60 days before Christmas? Will we have to forego a light bulb in the microwave oven? I think we're being LED down the wrong path I tell ya. This is part of the global warming panic, set up by none other than algore and his cheap flick. Look for more cockamamie ideas being floated. Why hell, just this week I read they're proposing to put catalitic converters on lawnmowers. It will first start in California and the rest will follow. It is amazing how easy people are led. -- Can you think of at least one valid and proven reason to reduce emissions, assuming global warming was not an issue? Just one. It's easy. Why should I answer one of your questions when you refuse to answer mine. Take a hike. Face it, you don't have an answer, pompous ass. |
#28
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <132la47m5acqm58 (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com>, "mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-B944EF.16443420042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <_9aWh.7141$ya1.1995 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-B756BF.16160320042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <WsadndUY34TtnrTbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: What do you think of this attempt in Congress to ban incandescent light bulbs? I think it's a shame those who are pushing for it haven't done their homework. Will we have to apply for an exemption 30-60 days before Christmas? Will we have to forego a light bulb in the microwave oven? I think we're being LED down the wrong path I tell ya. This is part of the global warming panic, set up by none other than algore and his cheap flick. Look for more cockamamie ideas being floated. Why hell, just this week I read they're proposing to put catalitic converters on lawnmowers. It will first start in California and the rest will follow. It is amazing how easy people are led. -- Can you think of at least one valid and proven reason to reduce emissions, assuming global warming was not an issue? Just one. It's easy. Why should I answer one of your questions when you refuse to answer mine. Take a hike. Face it, you don't have an answer, pompous ass. LOL mack you are a treasure. I hope you have a nice comfortable weekend. -- |
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
"dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-E64508.19184121042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <132la47m5acqm58 (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com>, "mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-B944EF.16443420042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <_9aWh.7141$ya1.1995 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-B756BF.16160320042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <WsadndUY34TtnrTbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: What do you think of this attempt in Congress to ban incandescent light bulbs? I think it's a shame those who are pushing for it haven't done their homework. Will we have to apply for an exemption 30-60 days before Christmas? Will we have to forego a light bulb in the microwave oven? I think we're being LED down the wrong path I tell ya. This is part of the global warming panic, set up by none other than algore and his cheap flick. Look for more cockamamie ideas being floated. Why hell, just this week I read they're proposing to put catalitic converters on lawnmowers. It will first start in California and the rest will follow. It is amazing how easy people are led. -- Can you think of at least one valid and proven reason to reduce emissions, assuming global warming was not an issue? Just one. It's easy. Why should I answer one of your questions when you refuse to answer mine. Take a hike. Face it, you don't have an answer, pompous ass. LOL mack you are a treasure. I hope you have a nice comfortable weekend. -- So, you noticed his comment, but you're unable to answer MY message, in which I pointed out that you can't show anyone the questions you think I don't answer. Nice job. |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote in message news:bf719$462a27b4$47c2b532$16539 (AT) msgid (DOT) meganewsservers.com... "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote in message news:AIudnckA65MjebTbnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... snipped Don't use dimmers. They generate globs of RFI. Some brands are better than others but they are all dirty. -- Radio Frequency Interference? As far as I can tell, dimmers haven't been a problem. Light fixture/motion detector combo units (screw detector in first and then screw light bulb into detector) caused verifiable interference with my FAX/phone unit and another telecommunication piece of equipment. Like I said, dimmers haven't been a problem. As a matter of fact, every single GE and Phillips sunlight spectrum incandescent that's connected to the dimmers have lasted longer than any fluorescents. Dimmers extend longevity. I understand there's a finite limit of tungsten, so finding a good substitute ahead of time isn't unreasonable. What is unreasonable is for the government to get everyone excited about digital TV, and yet so far they use many more times the amount of electricity than a typical CRT. And for every watt that produces heat it takes two watts to cool. Some politicians may think they are showing and advocating, but it's from the heart and not the mind. Are you still with me or did I lose you after the first sentence? Bruce B is a lot more knowledgeable about this subject than I am, but I'lll give it a shot anyway. The motion detector probably causes interference because it is transmitting a signal that some other electronic devices pick up. My understanding is that dimmers extend the life of incandescent bulbs because they reduce the voltage to the bulbs, so they produce less heat and light, which extends the life of the filaments. Someone once suggested that using bulbs rated for 240 volts would last longer because they are effectively working at half of their rated voltage in household use. They also provide 1/4th the rated light output. Jeff -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |