AutosTalk Forums  

OT# Hey Scott in Florida

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss OT# Hey Scott in Florida in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old   
Bruce L. Bergman
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: OT# Hey Scott in Florida - 04-22-2007 , 01:27 AM






On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:59:42 -0500, "Ray O"
<rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote:
Quote:
"mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:AIudnckA65MjebTbnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...

snipped
Don't use dimmers. They generate globs of RFI. Some brands are better
than others but they are all dirty.
--


Radio Frequency Interference? As far as I can tell, dimmers haven't been a
problem. Light fixture/motion detector combo units (screw detector in
first and then screw light bulb into detector) caused verifiable
interference with my FAX/phone unit and another telecommunication piece of
equipment.

Like I said, dimmers haven't been a problem. As a matter of fact, every
single GE and Phillips sunlight spectrum incandescent that's connected to
the dimmers have lasted longer than any fluorescents. Dimmers extend
longevity.

I understand there's a finite limit of tungsten, so finding a good
substitute ahead of time isn't unreasonable. What is unreasonable is for
the government to get everyone excited about digital TV, and yet so far
they use many more times the amount of electricity than a typical CRT. And
for every watt that produces heat it takes two watts to cool. Some
politicians may think they are showing and advocating, but it's from the
heart and not the mind.
Are you still with me or did I lose you after the first sentence?
I'll take Tungsten over Mercury any day - Tungsten is inert.

Both can be recycled, but for the most part aren't - nobody wants to
pay the excessive costs for lamp collection and recovery, handling
them as Hazardous Waste is very expensive and it's very hard (often
nearly impossible) to pass along the costs - so the vast majority of
the industry talks a good game, but when the rubber meets the road
they just look the other way and pitch the dead lamps into the regular
municipal landfill...

I'm all for "Doing the right thing" - but when the disposal fees for
the old lamps coming out costs more than the new lamps going in, that
simply makes no sense...

The one good thing is that they use a lot less mercury in modern
"Alto" or "Eco-Lume" fluorescent lamps with the green end-caps, just
enough to work. And so little as to raise the recovery costs even
higher - if they don't have as much reclaimed mercury to resell, they
have to charge the Hazardous Waste generators (us) more of the costs
when they send in used lamps for recycling.

Quote:
Bruce B is a lot more knowledgeable about this subject than I am, but I'lll
give it a shot anyway.

The motion detector probably causes interference because it is transmitting
a signal that some other electronic devices pick up.
The dimmers put out some noise, but it is not long range - it'll rip
up AM radio for 20 feet and that's about it... What kills CFL lamps
and normal non-dimming fluorescent fixture ballasts is the reduced
voltage from being behind a dimmer, plus the electronic hash of the
dimmer circuit's Triacs or SCRs chopping up the waveform instead of
getting a nice steady sine wave from the utility.

Incandescent lamps are pure resistance loads, they don't care about
the incoming waveform - within reason.

Certain cheap incandescent lamps with one long straight unsupported
filament don't like dimmers at ALL, frequency resonances cause the
filament to start 'whipping' around in a circle like a jumprope doing
Double Dutch, the repeated flexing of the brittle tungsten will kill
them fast - but most dimmers just chop the power once per half-cycle,
they aren't trying to do a high-frequency switching conversion. The
light persistence of a white-hot filament makes that 120Hz flicker
disappear, until you get down to the 'very dim' levels.

Quote:
My understanding is that dimmers extend the life of incandescent bulbs
because they reduce the voltage to the bulbs, so they produce less heat and
light, which extends the life of the filaments. Someone once suggested
that using bulbs rated for 240 volts would last longer because they are
effectively working at half of their rated voltage in household use.
240V incandescent lamps are for use in Europe - use a 240V lamp on
120V and it'll barely glow and be way too inefficient.

You can get both 240V and 277V lamps with regular USA-Spec Medium
(AKA "Edison") bases for specialized industrial uses (Janitor Closets
in large office buildings where they only had 277V lighting circuits
handy), but they are rare - Most developers will pay the few bucks
more and put in the proper fluorescent fixture with a 277V ballast
rather than deal with the hassles and safety concerns.

(I got called to a mid-rise office in West LA and had to go get a
case of 277V lamps and paint "277 VOLT LAMPS ONLY" on the sockets.
The tenant that leased 2/3 of the building said "We tried changing
them, but the lamps only lasted about 15 seconds and got /real/
bright...")

They make 130V "Long-Life Lamps" for use on American 120V circuits
and you get roughly double the life - but there's a big lumen/watt
efficiency hit to match. You only want to use those lamps on second-
story chandeliers and other places where the lamps are hard to change,
or where you have to call a professional to do it for you.

Dimmers give you the same effect if you run them slightly dimmed
most of the time, with standard 120V lamps available anywhere.

They use 140V or 145V rated lamps for {<EXIT>} lights on nominal
120V circuits, but that's to save the trouble of changing them - and
they have to use a 15W 145V lamp to get about 5W of usable light.
When you have to pay someone to change lamps, suddenly the cost of the
lamps or the energy they use pales in comparison to the labor.

--<< Bruce >>--



Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old   
mark_digital©
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: OT# Hey Scott in Florida - 04-22-2007 , 08:04 AM







"dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
In article <oMudncaYR6cfhrfbnZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>,
"mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote:

"dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:question*mark-7FA55E.08573321042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com...
In article <P5idnYtKraT8YrTbnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>,
"mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote:


If all my talk about dimmers has upset your stomach, I'm sorry dbu.

Where in heavens sake did you get that idea? I am just trying to
educate you.
--


It was a poor ideological joke.

Is that what they call dark humor?
--

Hmm, hmm. Say no more.




Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old   
mark_digital©
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: OT# Hey Scott in Florida - 04-22-2007 , 08:24 AM




"Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:question*mark-D5BB33.10372821042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com...
In article <F0qWh.569$nR1.70@trnddc06>, "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com
wrote:



Assuming makes an ass out of you. More accurately, you make an ass out
of
yourself.

--"I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time
thinking about myself, about why I do things." G.W. Bush, June 4, 2003
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...030604-3.html).

So we have a President who makes decisiosn that affect millions of
lives,
including the lives of countries that we invade, and he doesn't think
about
why he does things.

I think that, and the fact that you susport this asshole, says it all.

Jeff

You are more guilty of assuming things than I am.

Where is the open mindedness of the liberal? Can't stand to have
someone disagree with you?

You're welcome to disagree with me. So is anyone else.

You think your ideas are the only right
ones?

No, I don't. And they sometimes turn out to be wrong.

Again, you are just a narrow minded minion with blinders.

At least I am able to analyze myself. Even Bush says he is not analtyical.
His comments confirm this.

Jeff
--


Analtyical as in anal tickle? In my day it was called stinkfinger.

Last night on television there was this small enthusiastic crowd talking
about "lifters" as if this was something new to enhance the looks of a
woman's breast. I turned to my wife and asked (as if I didn't know), Aren't
those falsies?
Wow! What a re-discovery!
And then there was a commercial for a type of squeeze-yourself-in garment
they called Trim (something), and I said, Wow, they just re-discovered
girdles. I wonder if we'll see a rash of reports on veracious veins in a
year or two.

(Speaking of rash) What's coming next? Designer color toilet tissue?





Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old   
mark_digital©
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: OT# Hey Scott in Florida - 04-22-2007 , 08:35 AM




"Bruce L. Bergman" <blnospambergman (AT) earthlink (DOT) invalid> wrote

Quote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:22:17 -0400, "mark_digital©"
XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote:


I would like to point out something I learned recently from my electrician
when I told him my florescent tubes were failing prematurely. He said the
tubes must be kept on. (Left, instead of kept, if you like)

Fluorescents are rated for 12K hours at 4 hours a start, IIRC.
Reduce that run time to a half-hour per start, and they drop off
dramatically - there are only so many starts in the lamp, and either
the filaments or the ballast electronics take a crap.

Left on all the time like they are in emergency stairwells, and that
same lamp will last for double or triple the rated hours, or more.
They usually fail when the filaments do - but if the filaments fail
while the lamp is lit it will stay lit until the power flickers and
the arc goes out. Or the ballast fails.

I use toggle wall dimmers in certain rooms and it took much effort to
educate the rest of the family as to the hazards of substituting
fluorescents I had in stock for the burned out incandescent. Will they
remember? I'm not about to spring for the even more expensive fluorescents
that can handle variable power.

Read the packages carefully: Almost all Compact Fluorescent Lamps
can NOT be dimmed, just like regular permanently installed fluorescent
light fixtures. And the ones that can be dimmed are not cheap to set
up, they require special dimmers and special ballasts designed to work
together, and sometimes special lamps.

And every time you change the lamps in one of those special dimmed
fluorescent fixtures you have to burn in the new lamps for a week by
running them at full brightness before you try dimming them, or you
will have early lamp failures.

They have made Compact Fluorescent Lamps (the one piece curly bulbs)
in the past that were supposed to be dimable with standard consumer
grade incandescent dimmers, but all the ones I've seen have been
discontinued - they usually don't live long. And I've heard of a few
fires and melted lamps, don't even try.

For the most efficiency in an incandescent fixture, get the quartz
halogen capsule lamps like the Phillips Halogena - they are the best
compromise that can be easily dimmed.

And try not to run them dimmed way down for too long at a stretch,
the whole idea of the design is to keep the vaporized tungsten in
suspension in the halogen gases till you turn off the power, when it
redeposits on the filament.

If you run the lamps too cool by being severely dimmed most of the
time, the tungsten will deposit on the glass instead, and you get the
typical silvery inner coating on the lamp glass... Ramp them up to
full brightness for about a minute to get good and hot before you shut
them off.

--<< Bruce >>--

Unless somehow I missed it, you haven't said anything about the lack of a
sudden surge of power, which I thought extended the life expectancy of an
incandescent bulb. Am I wrong about this?




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.