![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
"mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote in message news:AIudnckA65MjebTbnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... snipped Don't use dimmers. They generate globs of RFI. Some brands are better than others but they are all dirty. -- Radio Frequency Interference? As far as I can tell, dimmers haven't been a problem. Light fixture/motion detector combo units (screw detector in first and then screw light bulb into detector) caused verifiable interference with my FAX/phone unit and another telecommunication piece of equipment. Like I said, dimmers haven't been a problem. As a matter of fact, every single GE and Phillips sunlight spectrum incandescent that's connected to the dimmers have lasted longer than any fluorescents. Dimmers extend longevity. I understand there's a finite limit of tungsten, so finding a good substitute ahead of time isn't unreasonable. What is unreasonable is for the government to get everyone excited about digital TV, and yet so far they use many more times the amount of electricity than a typical CRT. And for every watt that produces heat it takes two watts to cool. Some politicians may think they are showing and advocating, but it's from the heart and not the mind. Are you still with me or did I lose you after the first sentence? |
|
Bruce B is a lot more knowledgeable about this subject than I am, but I'lll give it a shot anyway. The motion detector probably causes interference because it is transmitting a signal that some other electronic devices pick up. |
|
My understanding is that dimmers extend the life of incandescent bulbs because they reduce the voltage to the bulbs, so they produce less heat and light, which extends the life of the filaments. Someone once suggested that using bulbs rated for 240 volts would last longer because they are effectively working at half of their rated voltage in household use. |
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <oMudncaYR6cfhrfbnZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-7FA55E.08573321042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <P5idnYtKraT8YrTbnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, "mark_digital©" <XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: If all my talk about dimmers has upset your stomach, I'm sorry dbu. Where in heavens sake did you get that idea? I am just trying to educate you. -- It was a poor ideological joke. Is that what they call dark humor? -- |
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
"dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message news:question*mark-D5BB33.10372821042007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com... In article <F0qWh.569$nR1.70@trnddc06>, "Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com wrote: Assuming makes an ass out of you. More accurately, you make an ass out of yourself. --"I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things." G.W. Bush, June 4, 2003 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...030604-3.html). So we have a President who makes decisiosn that affect millions of lives, including the lives of countries that we invade, and he doesn't think about why he does things. I think that, and the fact that you susport this asshole, says it all. Jeff You are more guilty of assuming things than I am. Where is the open mindedness of the liberal? Can't stand to have someone disagree with you? You're welcome to disagree with me. So is anyone else. You think your ideas are the only right ones? No, I don't. And they sometimes turn out to be wrong. Again, you are just a narrow minded minion with blinders. At least I am able to analyze myself. Even Bush says he is not analtyical. His comments confirm this. Jeff -- |
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:22:17 -0400, "mark_digital©" XXX-976 (AT) commacast (DOT) com> wrote: I would like to point out something I learned recently from my electrician when I told him my florescent tubes were failing prematurely. He said the tubes must be kept on. (Left, instead of kept, if you like) Fluorescents are rated for 12K hours at 4 hours a start, IIRC. Reduce that run time to a half-hour per start, and they drop off dramatically - there are only so many starts in the lamp, and either the filaments or the ballast electronics take a crap. Left on all the time like they are in emergency stairwells, and that same lamp will last for double or triple the rated hours, or more. They usually fail when the filaments do - but if the filaments fail while the lamp is lit it will stay lit until the power flickers and the arc goes out. Or the ballast fails. I use toggle wall dimmers in certain rooms and it took much effort to educate the rest of the family as to the hazards of substituting fluorescents I had in stock for the burned out incandescent. Will they remember? I'm not about to spring for the even more expensive fluorescents that can handle variable power. Read the packages carefully: Almost all Compact Fluorescent Lamps can NOT be dimmed, just like regular permanently installed fluorescent light fixtures. And the ones that can be dimmed are not cheap to set up, they require special dimmers and special ballasts designed to work together, and sometimes special lamps. And every time you change the lamps in one of those special dimmed fluorescent fixtures you have to burn in the new lamps for a week by running them at full brightness before you try dimming them, or you will have early lamp failures. They have made Compact Fluorescent Lamps (the one piece curly bulbs) in the past that were supposed to be dimable with standard consumer grade incandescent dimmers, but all the ones I've seen have been discontinued - they usually don't live long. And I've heard of a few fires and melted lamps, don't even try. For the most efficiency in an incandescent fixture, get the quartz halogen capsule lamps like the Phillips Halogena - they are the best compromise that can be easily dimmed. And try not to run them dimmed way down for too long at a stretch, the whole idea of the design is to keep the vaporized tungsten in suspension in the halogen gases till you turn off the power, when it redeposits on the filament. If you run the lamps too cool by being severely dimmed most of the time, the tungsten will deposit on the glass instead, and you get the typical silvery inner coating on the lamp glass... Ramp them up to full brightness for about a minute to get good and hot before you shut them off. --<< Bruce >>-- |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |