OT: Wolfowitz out, now get rid of the world bank

It's just a bureaucracy that only exists so useless politicians like
Wolfowitz can continue to sponge off the taxpayers. It was meant to be
a temporary institution for helping rebuild Europe after WWII, but
the bureaucrats refused to let their cash cow die. Now it's time to
kill it.

"ToMh" <tlhumm (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

It's just a bureaucracy that only exists so useless politicians like
Wolfowitz can continue to sponge off the taxpayers. It was meant to be
a temporary institution for helping rebuild Europe after WWII, but
the bureaucrats refused to let their cash cow die. Now it's time to
kill it.

Wolfowitz was one of several willing recipients of ideas from a scumbag
named Manucher Ghorbanifar, who has, over the years, tried to influence our
Middle East policy. The CIA considers the guy a highly unreliable source of
information, but since he talks the same game as Cheney and Wolfowitz, he
gets a warm welcome in some circles. I suspect someone wanted to keep
Wolfowitz "in town", hence his stay at the World Bank.

ToMh, 5/18/2007,1:05:29 PM, wrote:

It's just a bureaucracy that only exists so useless politicians like
Wolfowitz can continue to sponge off the taxpayers. It was meant to be
a temporary institution for helping rebuild Europe after WWII, but
the bureaucrats refused to let their cash cow die. Now it's time to
kill it.

I'll go along with that sentiment. But I'd like to add the UN to that
list of organizations that have outlived their usefulness. Get rid of
that corrupt bureaucracy and watch the world start to function better.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

ToMh, 5/18/2007,1:05:29 PM, wrote:

It's just a bureaucracy that only exists so useless politicians like
Wolfowitz can continue to sponge off the taxpayers. It was meant to be
a temporary institution for helping rebuild Europe after WWII, but
the bureaucrats refused to let their cash cow die. Now it's time to
kill it.

I'll go along with that sentiment. But I'd like to add the UN to that
list of organizations that have outlived their usefulness. Get rid of
that corrupt bureaucracy and watch the world start to function better.

Re: Wolfowitz ....I wonder if his 'girlfriend' (who's not exactly an epitome

of feminine pulchritude herself) ever took a look at ol' Paul in Michael
Moore's picture "Fahrenheit 9/11" in which he grooms himself by sticking his
pocket comb in his mouth, to put some spittle on it, and then combs his
hair. I wonder how she likes kissing a guy who puts his comb in his
mouth.....?
To my mind, that single act alone is worthy of keeping this jerk out of any
responsible job, let alone president of the World Bank, or having the ear of
the president of the USA. I wouldn't want the guy to wash my dishes.

" dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote

In article <13511552lotgu1e (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com>,
"mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote:



Re: Wolfowitz ....I wonder if his 'girlfriend' (who's not exactly an
epitome
of feminine pulchritude herself) ever took a look at ol' Paul in Michael
Moore's picture "Fahrenheit 9/11" in which he grooms himself by sticking
his
pocket comb in his mouth, to put some spittle on it, and then combs his
hair. I wonder how she likes kissing a guy who puts his comb in his
mouth.....?
To my mind, that single act alone is worthy of keeping this jerk out of
any
responsible job, let alone president of the World Bank, or having the ear
of
the president of the USA. I wouldn't want the guy to wash my dishes.

Seems as though you are taking a bit of cheap shot at this woman, which
you know NOTHING about.

The only judgment he made re: Paul W's gf was on her physical appearance.
If he's seen a photo of her, then he can comment on her "feminine
pulchritude" or lack thereof. (IHO - since after all, "Beauty's in the eyes
of the beholder.") I can't comment one way or the other, because I haven't
seen a likeness of her.

Cathy




I think you should just keep your big mouth

shut for you don't have a clue of what's going on with this situation
other than what you read on moveon or watch on moores flicks.
--



"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers.
We are the President." Hillary Clinton

" dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote

In article <96idnaOC_9XMV83b4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>,
"Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote:

" dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:nsp-6BC3A9.16115320052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com...
In article <13511552lotgu1e (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com>,
"mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote:



Re: Wolfowitz ....I wonder if his 'girlfriend' (who's not exactly an
epitome
of feminine pulchritude herself) ever took a look at ol' Paul in
Michael
Moore's picture "Fahrenheit 9/11" in which he grooms himself by
sticking
his
pocket comb in his mouth, to put some spittle on it, and then combs
his
hair. I wonder how she likes kissing a guy who puts his comb in his
mouth.....?
To my mind, that single act alone is worthy of keeping this jerk out
of
any
responsible job, let alone president of the World Bank, or having the
ear
of
the president of the USA. I wouldn't want the guy to wash my
dishes.

Seems as though you are taking a bit of cheap shot at this woman, which
you know NOTHING about.

The only judgment he made re: Paul W's gf was on her physical appearance.
If he's seen a photo of her, then he can comment on her "feminine
pulchritude" or lack thereof. (IHO - since after all, "Beauty's in the
eyes
of the beholder.") I can't comment one way or the other, because I
haven't
seen a likeness of her.

Cathy

If this were part of a democrat wing would you post anything at all?

Yeah, because your reply didn't make sense, re: what mack had posted.

Cathy

I think you should just keep your big mouth
shut for you don't have a clue of what's going on with this situation
other than what you read on moveon or watch on moores flicks.
--



"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers.
We are the President." Hillary Clinton
--



"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers.
We are the President." Hillary Clinton

" dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote

In article <geidnYbhd5FpRs3b4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>,
"Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote:

" dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:nsp-972B53.18335920052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com...
In article <96idnaOC_9XMV83b4p2dnA (AT) giganews (DOT) com>,
"Cathy F." <clfr (AT) adelphiadotdedot (DOT) net> wrote:

" dbu.," <nsp (AT) einp (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:nsp-6BC3A9.16115320052007 (AT) comcast (DOT) dca.giganews.com...
In article <13511552lotgu1e (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com>,
"mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote:



Re: Wolfowitz ....I wonder if his 'girlfriend' (who's not exactly
an
epitome
of feminine pulchritude herself) ever took a look at ol' Paul in
Michael
Moore's picture "Fahrenheit 9/11" in which he grooms himself by
sticking
his
pocket comb in his mouth, to put some spittle on it, and then combs
his
hair. I wonder how she likes kissing a guy who puts his comb in
his
mouth.....?
To my mind, that single act alone is worthy of keeping this jerk
out
of
any
responsible job, let alone president of the World Bank, or having
the
ear
of
the president of the USA. I wouldn't want the guy to wash my
dishes.

Seems as though you are taking a bit of cheap shot at this woman,
which
you know NOTHING about.

The only judgment he made re: Paul W's gf was on her physical
appearance.
If he's seen a photo of her, then he can comment on her "feminine
pulchritude" or lack thereof. (IHO - since after all, "Beauty's in the
eyes
of the beholder.") I can't comment one way or the other, because I
haven't
seen a likeness of her.

Cathy

If this were part of a democrat wing would you post anything at all?

Yeah, because your reply didn't make sense, re: what mack had posted.

Cathy

Your reply does not make any sense either. Why did you reply at all?
Defending him perhaps?

If by "him" you mean mack, then yes, sort of. He made a clear-cut comment,
re: her looks. You said that he was taking a cheap shot at her, and that he
knew nothing about her. All he needed to know in order to make the
observation he did, is what she looks like. If you had replied something
along the line of: "I disagree; I think she's attractive & feminine
looking," that would've made sense. But your reply indicated that you
seemed to think that he had made all sorts of slurs about her. Which wasn't
the case.

Cathy

"mack" <mackerel (AT) dslextreme (DOT) com> wrote

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:xn0f6eggt2zio2a003 (AT) news (DOT) readfreenews.net...
ToMh, 5/18/2007,1:05:29 PM, wrote:

It's just a bureaucracy that only exists so useless politicians like
Wolfowitz can continue to sponge off the taxpayers. It was meant to be
a temporary institution for helping rebuild Europe after WWII, but
the bureaucrats refused to let their cash cow die. Now it's time to
kill it.

I'll go along with that sentiment. But I'd like to add the UN to that
list of organizations that have outlived their usefulness. Get rid of
that corrupt bureaucracy and watch the world start to function better.

Re: Wolfowitz ....I wonder if his 'girlfriend' (who's not exactly an
epitome of feminine pulchritude herself)

Okay, I Googled Shaha Riza. Well, her hair is a rather nice color. But
basically, yeah, IMO, you're right. OTOH, hey, as long as he likes her...

Cathy









ever took a look at ol' Paul in Michael

Moore's picture "Fahrenheit 9/11" in which he grooms himself by sticking
his pocket comb in his mouth, to put some spittle on it, and then combs
his hair. I wonder how she likes kissing a guy who puts his comb in his
mouth.....?
To my mind, that single act alone is worthy of keeping this jerk out of
any responsible job, let alone president of the World Bank, or having the
ear of the president of the USA. I wouldn't want the guy to wash my
dishes.