 | |
{OT} For King George "fans"
Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#61
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: {OT} For King George "fans" -
05-13-2007
, 10:16 AM
|
"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant (AT) mindspring (DOT) net> wrote in message news:255e43loi7o6aieh15mh2ufs82ov7k2or8 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Yah, it's not very dangerous skipping most of your national guard time and not flying planes either. If he was there flying planes, how come his commanding officer didn't even know who he was because he was never there. He was a pilot. What were you? Scott in Florida That statement in no way addresses what you responded to. What were you? |
He was a pilot.....
--
Scott in Florida
#62
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007 13:41:06 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant (AT) mindspring (DOT) net> wrote in message news:255e43loi7o6aieh15mh2ufs82ov7k2or8 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... Yah, it's not very dangerous skipping most of your national guard time and not flying planes either. If he was there flying planes, how come his commanding officer didn't even know who he was because he was never there. He was a pilot. What were you? Scott in Florida That statement in no way addresses what you responded to. What were you? He was a pilot..... -- Scott in Florida |
reading in school.
#63
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <SzE1i.8505$ya1.2793 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: That statement in no way addresses what you responded to. You should look back at some of your own postings you weasel. |
He is a New Yanker....need anything else be said?
--
Scott in Florida
#64
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007 09:13:21 -0500, "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com wrote: In article <SzE1i.8505$ya1.2793 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: That statement in no way addresses what you responded to. You should look back at some of your own postings you weasel. LOL.....that is putting it politely He is a New Yanker....need anything else be said? -- Scott in Florida |
He's a Wanker. Or as Hawkeye Pierce once put it, he's the newsgroup self
abuse director.
Charles of Schaumburg
#65
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant (AT) mindspring (DOT) net> wrote in message news:8h7e435jm2pckpck6cqb19r5fk0d4c49nf (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sun, 13 May 2007 09:13:21 -0500, "dbu.," <question*mark (AT) einp (DOT) com wrote: In article <SzE1i.8505$ya1.2793 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny>, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: That statement in no way addresses what you responded to. You should look back at some of your own postings you weasel. LOL.....that is putting it politely He is a New Yanker....need anything else be said? -- Scott in Florida The Brits have a somewhat older term for him. He's a Wanker. Or as Hawkeye Pierce once put it, he's the newsgroup self abuse director. Charles of Schaumburg |
--
Scott in Florida
#66
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007 00:13:29 GMT, "Truckdude" <shrub (AT) thedeecider (DOT) com Because he is a draft dodger who did not have the balls to just fess up and be one. Clinton did not believe in the Vietnam War and took a stand against it. Yes, there are, but not ones where you can give the impression that you want to serve your country in time of war, without having to worry about fighting the enemy. Typical chickenhawk repug. How can you be sure you won't go to war if you are a fighter pilot. |
be so naive.
#67
| |||
| |||
|
|
Dims are dim. Dims are cowards... |
#68
| |||
| |||
|
|
Scott in Florida wrote: On Sun, 13 May 2007 00:13:29 GMT, "Truckdude" <shrub (AT) thedeecider (DOT) com Because he is a draft dodger who did not have the balls to just fess up and be one. Clinton did not believe in the Vietnam War and took a stand against it. Yes, there are, but not ones where you can give the impression that you want to serve your country in time of war, without having to worry about fighting the enemy. Typical chickenhawk repug. How can you be sure you won't go to war if you are a fighter pilot. In the National Guard during the Vietnam war years, after 1968? Don't be so naive. |
--
Scott in Florida
#69
| |||
| |||
|
|
Scott in Florida wrote: Dims are dim. Dims are cowards... Yet some of those so-called "cowards" have served in war. Have you? |
--
Scott in Florida
#70
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 May 2007 09:00:51 -0700, "rantonrave (AT) mail (DOT) com" rantonrave (AT) mail (DOT) com> wrote: Scott in Florida wrote: On Sun, 13 May 2007 00:13:29 GMT, "Truckdude" <shrub (AT) thedeecider (DOT) com Because he is a draft dodger who did not have the balls to just fess up and be one. Clinton did not believe in the Vietnam War and took a stand against it. Yes, there are, but not ones where you can give the impression that you want to serve your country in time of war, without having to worry about fighting the enemy. Typical chickenhawk repug. How can you be sure you won't go to war if you are a fighter pilot. In the National Guard during the Vietnam war years, after 1968? Don't be so naive. There were National Guard deaths in Viet Nam -- Scott in Florida |
was different in that war than in this one, perhaps because of the draft.
This is a MAYBE. Ponder it and let us know what you come up with.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.