AutosTalk Forums  

2001-2004 model year fatalities

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss 2001-2004 model year fatalities in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Wickeddoll
 
Posts: n/a

Default 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-16-2007 , 01:36 PM






http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.as...topart=pickups

The URL says "pickups" but it's all types of vehicles.

I'm surprised Toyotas weren't on the "highest rates of driver death" list,
since they tend to be rather small.

Natalie

--


"This is Toyota country; so quiet, you can hear the Fords rust."



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Ray O
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-16-2007 , 02:49 PM







"Wickeddoll" <wickeddoll1958DieSpammersDie (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.as...topart=pickups

The URL says "pickups" but it's all types of vehicles.

I'm surprised Toyotas weren't on the "highest rates of driver death" list,
since they tend to be rather small.

Natalie

--

I tend to be a little suspicious of information from the IIHS since they
exist to protect their own interests. In this case, they are reporting real
world results instead of tests that they have engineered, so the information
should be unbiased.

Some things that were not noted in the article:

- Of the 15 vehicles that had fewer than 20 deaths per million registered
vehicle years,
6 are Toyota/Lexus;
2 are Hondas
2 are BMWs
1 Infiniti
1 GM (Chevrolet)
1 Audi
2 Mercedes

Volvo touts their safety, however none made the list. I am surprised that
the Cadillac DTS, Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand Marquis, Ford Crown
Victoria, Mercedes S Class, and Lexus LS were not on the list.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Robert Watson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-16-2007 , 03:48 PM



Ray O wrote:
Quote:
"Wickeddoll" <wickeddoll1958DieSpammersDie (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:f2f1cl.3hs.1 (AT) news (DOT) evilcabal.org...
http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.as...topart=pickups

The URL says "pickups" but it's all types of vehicles.

I'm surprised Toyotas weren't on the "highest rates of driver death" list,
since they tend to be rather small.

Natalie

--


I tend to be a little suspicious of information from the IIHS since they
exist to protect their own interests. In this case, they are reporting real
world results instead of tests that they have engineered, so the information
should be unbiased.

Some things that were not noted in the article:

- Of the 15 vehicles that had fewer than 20 deaths per million registered
vehicle years,
6 are Toyota/Lexus;
2 are Hondas
2 are BMWs
1 Infiniti
1 GM (Chevrolet)
1 Audi
2 Mercedes

Volvo touts their safety, however none made the list. I am surprised that
the Cadillac DTS, Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand Marquis, Ford Crown
Victoria, Mercedes S Class, and Lexus LS were not on the list.
One of the things that is missing is that the cars don't drive
themselves. People drive them. More often than not, that is the weak link.

The stats are a reflection of both the safety of the vehicles and the
limitations of the drivers.

Jeff


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Ray O
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-16-2007 , 05:28 PM




"Robert Watson" <kidsdoc2000 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Ray O wrote:
"Wickeddoll" <wickeddoll1958DieSpammersDie (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:f2f1cl.3hs.1 (AT) news (DOT) evilcabal.org...
http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.as...topart=pickups

The URL says "pickups" but it's all types of vehicles.

I'm surprised Toyotas weren't on the "highest rates of driver death"
list, since they tend to be rather small.

Natalie

--


I tend to be a little suspicious of information from the IIHS since they
exist to protect their own interests. In this case, they are reporting
real world results instead of tests that they have engineered, so the
information should be unbiased.

Some things that were not noted in the article:

- Of the 15 vehicles that had fewer than 20 deaths per million registered
vehicle years,
6 are Toyota/Lexus;
2 are Hondas
2 are BMWs
1 Infiniti
1 GM (Chevrolet)
1 Audi
2 Mercedes

Volvo touts their safety, however none made the list. I am surprised
that the Cadillac DTS, Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand Marquis, Ford
Crown Victoria, Mercedes S Class, and Lexus LS were not on the list.

One of the things that is missing is that the cars don't drive themselves.
People drive them. More often than not, that is the weak link.

The stats are a reflection of both the safety of the vehicles and the
limitations of the drivers.

Jeff
Yup, something the article stressed several times.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)




Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Wickeddoll
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-16-2007 , 07:48 PM




"Ray O" ...
Quote:
"Robert Watson" :
"Wickeddoll" ..
http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.as...topart=pickups

The URL says "pickups" but it's all types of vehicles.

I'm surprised Toyotas weren't on the "highest rates of driver death"
list, since they tend to be rather small.

Natalie

--


I tend to be a little suspicious of information from the IIHS since they
exist to protect their own interests. In this case, they are reporting
real world results instead of tests that they have engineered, so the
information should be unbiased.

Some things that were not noted in the article:

- Of the 15 vehicles that had fewer than 20 deaths per million
registered vehicle years,
6 are Toyota/Lexus;
2 are Hondas
2 are BMWs
1 Infiniti
1 GM (Chevrolet)
1 Audi
2 Mercedes

Volvo touts their safety, however none made the list. I am surprised
that the Cadillac DTS, Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand Marquis, Ford
Crown Victoria, Mercedes S Class, and Lexus LS were not on the list.

One of the things that is missing is that the cars don't drive
themselves. People drive them. More often than not, that is the weak
link.

The stats are a reflection of both the safety of the vehicles and the
limitations of the drivers.

Jeff

Yup, something the article stressed several times.
--

Ray O
*shrug*

All surveys are quite subjective, but I found this one interesting for the
lack of small Toyotas on the list. Thought Echoes would be at least in the
middle (though mine's a 2000)

Natalie




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Ray O
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-17-2007 , 12:07 AM




"Wickeddoll" <wickeddoll1958DieSpammersDie (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Ray O" ...

"Robert Watson" :
"Wickeddoll" ..
http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.as...topart=pickups

The URL says "pickups" but it's all types of vehicles.

I'm surprised Toyotas weren't on the "highest rates of driver death"
list, since they tend to be rather small.

Natalie

--


I tend to be a little suspicious of information from the IIHS since
they exist to protect their own interests. In this case, they are
reporting real world results instead of tests that they have
engineered, so the information should be unbiased.

Some things that were not noted in the article:

- Of the 15 vehicles that had fewer than 20 deaths per million
registered vehicle years,
6 are Toyota/Lexus;
2 are Hondas
2 are BMWs
1 Infiniti
1 GM (Chevrolet)
1 Audi
2 Mercedes

Volvo touts their safety, however none made the list. I am surprised
that the Cadillac DTS, Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand Marquis, Ford
Crown Victoria, Mercedes S Class, and Lexus LS were not on the list.

One of the things that is missing is that the cars don't drive
themselves. People drive them. More often than not, that is the weak
link.

The stats are a reflection of both the safety of the vehicles and the
limitations of the drivers.

Jeff

Yup, something the article stressed several times.
--

Ray O

*shrug*

All surveys are quite subjective, but I found this one interesting for the
lack of small Toyotas on the list. Thought Echoes would be at least in
the middle (though mine's a 2000)

Natalie
It could be that the crumple zones in Echos are very cleverly designed with
lots of passenger compartment padding, or Echo drivers are very safe
drivers, or Echos don't have enough power to get up to lethal speeds ;-)
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Wickeddoll
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-17-2007 , 12:27 AM




"Ray O" ...
Quote:
"Wickeddoll"
"Robert Watson" :
http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.as...topart=pickups

The URL says "pickups" but it's all types of vehicles.

I'm surprised Toyotas weren't on the "highest rates of driver death"
list, since they tend to be rather small.

Natalie

--


I tend to be a little suspicious of information from the IIHS since
they exist to protect their own interests. In this case, they are
reporting real world results instead of tests that they have
engineered, so the information should be unbiased.

Some things that were not noted in the article:

- Of the 15 vehicles that had fewer than 20 deaths per million
registered vehicle years,
6 are Toyota/Lexus;
2 are Hondas
2 are BMWs
1 Infiniti
1 GM (Chevrolet)
1 Audi
2 Mercedes

Volvo touts their safety, however none made the list. I am surprised
that the Cadillac DTS, Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand Marquis, Ford
Crown Victoria, Mercedes S Class, and Lexus LS were not on the list.

One of the things that is missing is that the cars don't drive
themselves. People drive them. More often than not, that is the weak
link.

The stats are a reflection of both the safety of the vehicles and the
limitations of the drivers.

Jeff

Yup, something the article stressed several times.
--

Ray O

*shrug*

All surveys are quite subjective, but I found this one interesting for
the lack of small Toyotas on the list. Thought Echoes would be at least
in the middle (though mine's a 2000)

Natalie

It could be that the crumple zones in Echos are very cleverly designed
with lots of passenger compartment padding, or Echo drivers are very safe
drivers, or Echos don't have enough power to get up to lethal speeds ;-)
--

Ray O
On that last bit....

*fwap*

My car has considerable testicular fortitude!

Natalie




Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Ray O
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-17-2007 , 12:33 AM




"Wickeddoll" <wickeddoll1958DieSpammersDie (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
snipped
*shrug*

All surveys are quite subjective, but I found this one interesting for
the lack of small Toyotas on the list. Thought Echoes would be at least
in the middle (though mine's a 2000)

Natalie

It could be that the crumple zones in Echos are very cleverly designed
with lots of passenger compartment padding, or Echo drivers are very safe
drivers, or Echos don't have enough power to get up to lethal speeds ;-)
--

Ray O

On that last bit....

*fwap*

My car has considerable testicular fortitude!

Natalie

LOL! Or perhaps the Echo is so ugly that other cars keep away from it! <g
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)




Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Wickeddoll
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-17-2007 , 08:16 AM




"Ray O" ...
Quote:
"Wickeddoll" ...

snipped
*shrug*

All surveys are quite subjective, but I found this one interesting for
the lack of small Toyotas on the list. Thought Echoes would be at
least in the middle (though mine's a 2000)

Natalie

It could be that the crumple zones in Echos are very cleverly designed
with lots of passenger compartment padding, or Echo drivers are very
safe drivers, or Echos don't have enough power to get up to lethal
speeds ;-)
--

Ray O

On that last bit....

*fwap*

My car has considerable testicular fortitude!

Natalie

LOL! Or perhaps the Echo is so ugly that other cars keep away from it!
g
--

Ray O
HEY!

There are plenty of much uglier cars than Echoes out there! My little car
is cute, anyway, you philistine.

Natalie




Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Ray O
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001-2004 model year fatalities - 05-17-2007 , 10:35 AM




"Wickeddoll" <wickeddoll1958DieSpammersDie (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
snipped
LOL! Or perhaps the Echo is so ugly that other cars keep away from it!
g
--

Ray O

HEY!

There are plenty of much uglier cars than Echoes out there! My little car
is cute, anyway, you philistine.

Natalie

I'll agree, the Echo is not the ugliest ride on the road! ;-)
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.