![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
news:45f0ae2e$0$16304$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com... "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:2e2dnZEtEdqtMW3YnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... The 3.8 was a great engine until the government made the gasket manufactures stop using asbestos. Those 3.8 built in the years before and after the gasket problem was settled were tough as nails. mike Oddly enough, although Toyota and Honda were also forbidden to use asbestos they managed to avoid using crappy gaskets that failed early. Who says they did? Neither did most other Ford engines. Nor most Chevies and Chryslers. It wasn't that asbestos was no longer allowed to be used, but, rather, that Ford came out with a bad design. If Ford had to come out with a new design, so did other engine makers. Most other engine makers did not come out with a bad design. Ford didn't have to make a bad engine, either. Jeff It wasn't a bad design...as long as it had the right gasket. Mike's right...it WAS a good engine, a good trade between power and efficiency. But again, regulation killed it. And I found something else interesting. In the mid-late 90's they switched to a plastic intake. Heard many horror stories of the intakes melting! Stupidity? Nah...here in New England a lot of states require Ethanol in the fuel. The intake was not designed for this, so, in Mass particularly, there were a lot of meltdowns of the intakes. I'd blame that on the State before Ford. Ford reaponded to the problem and altered the material. You could do that but you would be wrong. "Gasohol" dates back the late '70's. I was using it in my '79 Monza. Every Ford built after that date should have been prepared to deal with sizeable amounts of alcohol in the fuel. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:28:37 -0400, Mike Hunter wrote: And, why are you here if you're such a cheerleader for GM? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:28:37 -0400, Mike Hunter wrote: And, why are you here if you're such a cheerleader for GM? You already know the answer to that question. Gee, no I don't... Unless you're saying Mikey's a Troll... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |