 | |
Re: Joe Liebermans views...
Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: Joe Liebermans views... -
04-30-2007
, 09:13 AM
|
"Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941333_61947 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:51:01 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177940786_61939 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:52:23 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177937278_61705 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... What about "state sponsors of terrorism"? Do they fall into the category of enemies we should not "talk to"? You mean like Syria and Iran - no, there is no point in talking to them. They have made their position clear, made their choice, they are not about changing their position, they already made this clear to the world. Like China and NK, the only thing you will get is word games, to delay any reaction, while they build against you. Leythos In that case, you need to write a little note to Lieberman and suggest that if he wants to continue working in Washington, he should stay in touch with what's happening in the real world. We are including Iran in "talks" yet again: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/wo...html?th&emc=th BAGHDAD, April 29 - The government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran announced Sunday that it would attend a regional conference on Iraq later this week, setting the stage for the first cabinet-level meeting between Iran and the United States since the end of 2004. Did you miss the part about it won't lead to anything, that it's just another delay tactic - if you follow all the meetings we've had, Iran, NK, the leaders of those countries only use them as a delay tactic... If we meet with them it's just a waste of time, everyone that is honest knows that. I suppose we have to keep up the "Image" and meet with them, but they've already said (Iran) that it's meaningless.... Leythos I wonder why it seems to be working with N. Korea. What do your inside sources tell you about that process? Nothing is working - what productive thing has come from NK in the last year? Leythos What are your 3 favorite news sources? |
He has you on the ropes with truth and you ask idiotic questions to
deflect....
--
Scott in Florida
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941895_61953 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: What are your 3 favorite news sources? I have several paths for news, some I take with little value, others I take with a good amount of value, and none of them I believe more than 50% of the time. I monitor CNN, Fox, BBC World News for the MSM (Main Stream Media) view. I monitor radical faction sites for news related to specific groups. I monitor a couple message boards related to intel. The only news I put much faith in is that which I get 1'st person, from a person that was there. I have family in the Military to give me 1st person view from that area.... Leythos If you only trust first person sources, that eliminates 99% of the information available to you. Good luck. Hope the cave is comfortable. |
ROFLMAO
--
Scott in Florida
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941333_61947 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:51:01 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177940786_61939 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:52:23 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177937278_61705 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... What about "state sponsors of terrorism"? Do they fall into the category of enemies we should not "talk to"? You mean like Syria and Iran - no, there is no point in talking to them. They have made their position clear, made their choice, they are not about changing their position, they already made this clear to the world. Like China and NK, the only thing you will get is word games, to delay any reaction, while they build against you. Leythos In that case, you need to write a little note to Lieberman and suggest that if he wants to continue working in Washington, he should stay in touch with what's happening in the real world. We are including Iran in "talks" yet again: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/wo...html?th&emc=th BAGHDAD, April 29 - The government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran announced Sunday that it would attend a regional conference on Iraq later this week, setting the stage for the first cabinet-level meeting between Iran and the United States since the end of 2004. Did you miss the part about it won't lead to anything, that it's just another delay tactic - if you follow all the meetings we've had, Iran, NK, the leaders of those countries only use them as a delay tactic... If we meet with them it's just a waste of time, everyone that is honest knows that. I suppose we have to keep up the "Image" and meet with them, but they've already said (Iran) that it's meaningless.... Leythos I wonder why it seems to be working with N. Korea. What do your inside sources tell you about that process? Nothing is working - what productive thing has come from NK in the last year? Leythos What are your 3 favorite news sources? There you go again....'legend in your own mind'.... He has you on the ropes with truth and you ask idiotic questions to deflect.... Scott in Florida |
instead of ducking it, as you always do.
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant (AT) mindspring (DOT) net> wrote in message news:3bub33dbavmdq83a5lhd928jt0saovhhf9 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941333_61947 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:51:01 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177940786_61939 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:52:23 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177937278_61705 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... What about "state sponsors of terrorism"? Do they fall into the category of enemies we should not "talk to"? You mean like Syria and Iran - no, there is no point in talking to them. They have made their position clear, made their choice, they are not about changing their position, they already made this clear to the world. Like China and NK, the only thing you will get is word games, to delay any reaction, while they build against you. Leythos In that case, you need to write a little note to Lieberman and suggest that if he wants to continue working in Washington, he should stay in touch with what's happening in the real world. We are including Iran in "talks" yet again: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/wo...html?th&emc=th BAGHDAD, April 29 - The government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran announced Sunday that it would attend a regional conference on Iraq later this week, setting the stage for the first cabinet-level meeting between Iran and the United States since the end of 2004. Did you miss the part about it won't lead to anything, that it's just another delay tactic - if you follow all the meetings we've had, Iran, NK, the leaders of those countries only use them as a delay tactic... If we meet with them it's just a waste of time, everyone that is honest knows that. I suppose we have to keep up the "Image" and meet with them, but they've already said (Iran) that it's meaningless.... Leythos I wonder why it seems to be working with N. Korea. What do your inside sources tell you about that process? Nothing is working - what productive thing has come from NK in the last year? Leythos What are your 3 favorite news sources? There you go again....'legend in your own mind'.... He has you on the ropes with truth and you ask idiotic questions to deflect.... Scott in Florida You must also think Leythos is an idiot, since he answered the question, instead of ducking it, as you always do. |
He hasn't been here long enough to see thru your idiotic tactics.
You made one of your famous illogical conclusions...but what is new?
--
Scott in Florida
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:05:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941895_61953 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: What are your 3 favorite news sources? I have several paths for news, some I take with little value, others I take with a good amount of value, and none of them I believe more than 50% of the time. I monitor CNN, Fox, BBC World News for the MSM (Main Stream Media) view. I monitor radical faction sites for news related to specific groups. I monitor a couple message boards related to intel. The only news I put much faith in is that which I get 1'st person, from a person that was there. I have family in the Military to give me 1st person view from that area.... Leythos If you only trust first person sources, that eliminates 99% of the information available to you. Good luck. Hope the cave is comfortable. He smoked you and all you can say is something about cave living... ROFLMAO Scott in Florida |
Watch me smoke you, you doddering old putz: What percentage of useful news
comes from non-military sources?
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:15:20 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant (AT) mindspring (DOT) net> wrote in message news:3bub33dbavmdq83a5lhd928jt0saovhhf9 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941333_61947 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:51:01 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177940786_61939 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:52:23 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177937278_61705 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... What about "state sponsors of terrorism"? Do they fall into the category of enemies we should not "talk to"? You mean like Syria and Iran - no, there is no point in talking to them. They have made their position clear, made their choice, they are not about changing their position, they already made this clear to the world. Like China and NK, the only thing you will get is word games, to delay any reaction, while they build against you. Leythos In that case, you need to write a little note to Lieberman and suggest that if he wants to continue working in Washington, he should stay in touch with what's happening in the real world. We are including Iran in "talks" yet again: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/wo...html?th&emc=th BAGHDAD, April 29 - The government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran announced Sunday that it would attend a regional conference on Iraq later this week, setting the stage for the first cabinet-level meeting between Iran and the United States since the end of 2004. Did you miss the part about it won't lead to anything, that it's just another delay tactic - if you follow all the meetings we've had, Iran, NK, the leaders of those countries only use them as a delay tactic... If we meet with them it's just a waste of time, everyone that is honest knows that. I suppose we have to keep up the "Image" and meet with them, but they've already said (Iran) that it's meaningless.... Leythos I wonder why it seems to be working with N. Korea. What do your inside sources tell you about that process? Nothing is working - what productive thing has come from NK in the last year? Leythos What are your 3 favorite news sources? There you go again....'legend in your own mind'.... He has you on the ropes with truth and you ask idiotic questions to deflect.... Scott in Florida You must also think Leythos is an idiot, since he answered the question, instead of ducking it, as you always do. Why he answered is beyond me. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941895_61953 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: What are your 3 favorite news sources? I have several paths for news, some I take with little value, others I take with a good amount of value, and none of them I believe more than 50% of the time. I monitor CNN, Fox, BBC World News for the MSM (Main Stream Media) view. I monitor radical faction sites for news related to specific groups. I monitor a couple message boards related to intel. The only news I put much faith in is that which I get 1'st person, from a person that was there. I have family in the Military to give me 1st person view from that area.... Leythos If you only trust first person sources, that eliminates 99% of the information available to you. Good luck. Hope the cave is comfortable. |
sources. While I have found Truth in non-first person sources, I don't
trust them without checking from multiple other sources. Don't
misunderstand what I said.
--
Leythos
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
spam999free (AT) rrohio (DOT) com (remove 999 for proper email address)
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:05:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" dishborealis (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941895_61953 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: What are your 3 favorite news sources? I have several paths for news, some I take with little value, others I take with a good amount of value, and none of them I believe more than 50% of the time. I monitor CNN, Fox, BBC World News for the MSM (Main Stream Media) view. I monitor radical faction sites for news related to specific groups. I monitor a couple message boards related to intel. The only news I put much faith in is that which I get 1'st person, from a person that was there. I have family in the Military to give me 1st person view from that area.... Leythos If you only trust first person sources, that eliminates 99% of the information available to you. Good luck. Hope the cave is comfortable. He smoked you and all you can say is something about cave living... |
what I thought.
--
Leythos
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
spam999free (AT) rrohio (DOT) com (remove 999 for proper email address)
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:05:29 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941895_61953 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: What are your 3 favorite news sources? I have several paths for news, some I take with little value, others I take with a good amount of value, and none of them I believe more than 50% of the time. I monitor CNN, Fox, BBC World News for the MSM (Main Stream Media) view. I monitor radical faction sites for news related to specific groups. I monitor a couple message boards related to intel. The only news I put much faith in is that which I get 1'st person, from a person that was there. I have family in the Military to give me 1st person view from that area.... Leythos If you only trust first person sources, that eliminates 99% of the information available to you. Good luck. Hope the cave is comfortable. I didn't say that was the only source, I said I only "Trust" first person sources. While I have found Truth in non-first person sources, I don't trust them without checking from multiple other sources. Don't misunderstand what I said. Leythos |
I'm surprised you missed this:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapc....ap/index.html
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177943813_62055 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:05:29 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Leythos" <Void (AT) nowhere (DOT) lan> wrote in message news:1177941895_61953 (AT) sp6iad (DOT) superfeed.net... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:56:44 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: What are your 3 favorite news sources? I have several paths for news, some I take with little value, others I take with a good amount of value, and none of them I believe more than 50% of the time. I monitor CNN, Fox, BBC World News for the MSM (Main Stream Media) view. I monitor radical faction sites for news related to specific groups. I monitor a couple message boards related to intel. The only news I put much faith in is that which I get 1'st person, from a person that was there. I have family in the Military to give me 1st person view from that area.... Leythos If you only trust first person sources, that eliminates 99% of the information available to you. Good luck. Hope the cave is comfortable. I didn't say that was the only source, I said I only "Trust" first person sources. While I have found Truth in non-first person sources, I don't trust them without checking from multiple other sources. Don't misunderstand what I said. Leythos I'm surprised you missed this: http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapc....ap/index.html |
--
Leythos
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
spam999free (AT) rrohio (DOT) com (remove 999 for proper email address)
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.