 | |
Re: OT Ann Coulter column Revenge of the Queers
Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: OT Ann Coulter column Revenge of the Queers -
08-18-2006
, 03:54 PM
|
In article <44e6070e$0$15856$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com>, "DH" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote: Clinton did a fair job protecting this county. This is only your opinion. I don't agree with it. Clinton did a lousy job. -- |
at 4 paragraphs, 20 or 30 sentences, several incontrovertible facts. In
reply, you write "Did not!" No pretense of examining the facts or the
argument.
You ARE Bush's base. Karl Rove goes to the bank on people like you. So
does Al-Qaeda. Not only does Al-Qaeda rely on faith-based arguments amongst
their supporters but their job is made easier by uncritical acceptance of
the BushCo policies by you.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Which statement is a lie? That bin Laden was and is in Afghanistan? |
you are trying to make? To which model of Bin Laden are you
referring? The hatchback hybrid, perhaps?
cordially, as always,
rm
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
DH <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> trolled: Which statement is a lie? That bin Laden was and is in Afghanistan? Do Bin Laden's outsell Toyotas in Afghanistan? Is that the argument you are trying to make? To which model of Bin Laden are you referring? The hatchback hybrid, perhaps? cordially, as always, rm |
going to be easier for you than wasting your time trying to do something
about the OT posts.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Look: you can join in, ignore the thread or killfile us, all of which is going to be easier for you than wasting your time trying to do something about the OT posts. |
Why don't you go to the appropriate group? Wouldn't a group
dedicated to the topics you wish to discuss, be better for you to
hold your discussions? Why do you feel the need, and what makes you
feel you have the right, to disrupt a Toyota group with your
off-topic postings?
Why do you feel you have the right to disrupt a Toyota group with
your off-topic postings?
Answer the question. Again: why do you feel you have the right to
disrupt a Toyota group with your off-topic postings?
We are here to discuss Toyotas. You are not. You are in the wrong,
clearly. So, leave.
cordially, as always,
rm
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
DH <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> trolled: Look: you can join in, ignore the thread or killfile us, all of which is going to be easier for you than wasting your time trying to do something about the OT posts. You can ignore us. Or you simply go to the appropriate group. Why don't you go to the appropriate group? Wouldn't a group dedicated to the topics you wish to discuss, be better for you to hold your discussions? Why do you feel the need, and what makes you feel you have the right, to disrupt a Toyota group with your off-topic postings? Why do you feel you have the right to disrupt a Toyota group with your off-topic postings? Answer the question. Again: why do you feel you have the right to disrupt a Toyota group with your off-topic postings? We are here to discuss Toyotas. You are not. You are in the wrong, clearly. So, leave. cordially, as always, rm |
WE will be here long after you are gone....
--
Scott in Florida
'The Land of the Free because of the Brave'
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <8mobe21igu1qcma8dfjqt7354v9oqocmqp (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, Stuart Krivis <jd (AT) mongo (DOT) krivis.com> wrote: [snip] |
Quote:
|
No! Let's us not forget clinton. Why didn't the clinton administration fail to capture or kill ben laydon? Why did the clinton administration fail the troops in somolia? Why did the clinton administration fail to know about a terrorist attack against the USS Cole? Why did the clinton administration not know about a terrorist attack against the WTC the first time? Why did the clinton administration fail to keep the citizens of the USA safe from terrorists? clinton had eight years, he and his administration failed us. There should be a congressional investigation of the failures of the clinton administration |
The above is a prime example of "If you can't dazzle them with
brilliance, baffle them with bullshit".
Also, you made a possible freudian slip in the second sentence:
"Why didn't the clinton administration fail to capture or kill ben
..........^^^^^................................... ...^^^^ Laydon?"
Good one Dbu ;-)
....
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
DH <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> trolled: Look: you can join in, ignore the thread or killfile us, all of which is going to be easier for you than wasting your time trying to do something about the OT posts. You can ignore us. Or you simply go to the appropriate group. Why don't you go to the appropriate group? Wouldn't a group dedicated to the topics you wish to discuss, be better for you to hold your discussions? Why do you feel the need, and what makes you feel you have the right, to disrupt a Toyota group with your off-topic postings? Why do you feel you have the right to disrupt a Toyota group with your off-topic postings? Answer the question. Again: why do you feel you have the right to disrupt a Toyota group with your off-topic postings? We are here to discuss Toyotas. You are not. You are in the wrong, clearly. So, leave. cordially, as always, rm |
Most of the posts of this nature are clearly marked as OFF TOPIC.
And as rabid as some in here may be, we all share something in common.
We all own or have owned TOYs, which makes it easier to relate to one
another (however acerbic and sarcastic that relationship might be
<g>).
So, clearly, it is YOU that is wrong.
But be my guest and feel free to stick around ;-)
....
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
dbu. wrote: In article <1155841022.720205.31350 (AT) b28g2000cwb (DOT) googlegroups.com>, do_not_spam_me (AT) my-deja (DOT) com wrote: Scott in Florida wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:24:20 -0500, "dh" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote: Billy Bob Clintoon had the chance to stop 9/11 by taking out Osama. 9/11 didn't happen on Clinton's watch but on Bush's, even though Bush was warned to be on the lookout for something like that. Your boy was sleeping at the wheel. Why didn't clinton get ben laden when he had the chance? I don't absolve Clinton on this. What about the battle at Mogadishu and those GI's who did not get the support that clinton administration should have provided. That's part of a long, sad tradition of U.S. presidents sending American forces into battle without sufficient support or numbers, and the results have always always been tragic, as the Iraqi war shows. Why didn't Clinton administration know about the first attack on the WTC? Clinton should have known that was coming. Probably because he had been in office for only a month and not warned by the previous administration, unlike the case with Bush, who had plenty of warnings and 8 months before 9/11. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Don't let the door hit you in the arse on the way out. |
be able to get in, unless you are one of those rare dogs who can
actually open doors.
Quote:
|
WE will be here long after you are gone.... |
the folks in Florida are too stupid to drive Toyotas. Your postings
would appear to confirm it.
So how did you even find your way here? Got lost, eh?
Can't find the appropriate group? So instead of admitting that you
can't find the right group, you make yourself look even more stupid
by posting to this one?
Killfiled for 28 days.
cordially, even to the least amongst us,
rm
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
No! Let's us not forget clinton. |
Is Toyota going to name a new model after him?
cordially, as always,
rm
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.