 | |
Re: {OT} China does not trust Bambi. Asks about his health care bull shit...
Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: {OT} China does not trust Bambi. Asks about his health care bull shit... -
11-18-2009
, 11:36 AM
|
"ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:007fdbf6$0$26923$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <GJTMm.9298$JC2.4556 (AT) newsfe06 (DOT) iad>, newstrash (AT) frontiernet (DOT) net says... "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. I dunno I'd have to research it & plus I was like only 8 yrs old at the time if you are referring to the 1972 visit to China that is. To say I'm annoyed is a bit of an assumption on your part I think. And honestly I'm more concerned about the *present* at the moment but I will give a look & see what the issues were than & maybe give you an answer. I'm really into consistency, so I thought I'd ask. |
much as you demand it from others.
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news  an.2009.11.18.17.34.52.562490 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:46 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. It's apples and oranges time again. How so, professor? |
And tell me, "perfesser", who had the MOST to do with China becoming the
World's manufacturer?
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:46 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. It's apples and oranges time again. |
How so, professor?
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:42:20 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.17.34.52.562490 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:46 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. It's apples and oranges time again. How so, professor? You tell me. What did Nixon have to do with what's going on now? |
He agreed to normalize relations with a communist dictatorship, while at the
same time claiming we were fighting communism in Vietnam. Sort of a
two-faced policy, don't you think?
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.21.45.47.332566 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:42:20 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.17.34.52.562490 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:46 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. It's apples and oranges time again. How so, professor? You tell me. What did Nixon have to do with what's going on now? He agreed to normalize relations with a communist dictatorship, while at the same time claiming we were fighting communism in Vietnam. Sort of a two-faced policy, don't you think? |
And you still didn't answer the second part. Afraid to?
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:53:49 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.21.45.47.332566 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:42:20 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.17.34.52.562490 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:46 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. It's apples and oranges time again. How so, professor? You tell me. What did Nixon have to do with what's going on now? He agreed to normalize relations with a communist dictatorship, while at the same time claiming we were fighting communism in Vietnam. Sort of a two-faced policy, don't you think? Meeting the 'enemy' face to face is two faced? |
Quote:
|
And you still didn't answer the second part. Afraid to? |
Cuba: No talk, no trade, no travel, no nothing. Nixon chose not to do that.
The results are obvious.
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.19.03.20.41.286056 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:53:49 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.21.45.47.332566 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:42:20 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.17.34.52.562490 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:46 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. It's apples and oranges time again. How so, professor? You tell me. What did Nixon have to do with what's going on now? He agreed to normalize relations with a communist dictatorship, while at the same time claiming we were fighting communism in Vietnam. Sort of a two-faced policy, don't you think? Meeting the 'enemy' face to face is two faced? Ping pong... And you still didn't answer the second part. Afraid to? Nixon could've insisted on maintaining the type of policy we've had with Cuba: No talk, no trade, no travel, no nothing. Nixon chose not to do that. The results are obvious. |
correct answer?
Surely a genius like YOU knows the correct answer.
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:32:37 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.19.03.20.41.286056 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:53:49 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.21.45.47.332566 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:42:20 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS> wrote in message news an.2009.11.18.17.34.52.562490 (AT) e86 (DOT) GTS...On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:46 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "ByTor" <ByTor (AT) snowdog (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00622eff$0$8037$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... In article <1es6g5lkip36l1ti7tfrhro7pqlfk0fnjn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, MoveOn (AT) outa (DOT) here says... http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/11/16/china-questions-costs-of-us-healthcare-reform/ ROFLMAO Jezus....even the Chi Coms know he is full of shit... Just what we need, being accountable & explaining ourselves to a communist government. I guess having a few fans of Mao Zedong in this administration helped, or dependance on US exports, I dunno which. So, I guess you were annoyed when Nixon got the ball rolling with the Chinese dictatorship. It's apples and oranges time again. How so, professor? You tell me. What did Nixon have to do with what's going on now? He agreed to normalize relations with a communist dictatorship, while at the same time claiming we were fighting communism in Vietnam. Sort of a two-faced policy, don't you think? Meeting the 'enemy' face to face is two faced? Ping pong... And you still didn't answer the second part. Afraid to? Nixon could've insisted on maintaining the type of policy we've had with Cuba: No talk, no trade, no travel, no nothing. Nixon chose not to do that. The results are obvious. STILL did not accurately answer the question. Why are you ducking the correct answer? Surely a genius like YOU knows the correct answer. |
The answer is that Nixon thought we needed ties with China as a balance to
Soviet misbehavior. But in pursuing this aim, he wrecked out economy
forever.
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Nixon could've insisted on maintaining the type of policy we've had with Cuba: No talk, no trade, no travel, no nothing. Nixon chose not to do that. The results are obvious. STILL did not accurately answer the question. Why are you ducking the correct answer? Surely a genius like YOU knows the correct answer. The answer is that Nixon thought we needed ties with China as a balance to Soviet misbehavior. But in pursuing this aim, he wrecked out economy forever. |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:24:47 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: Nixon could've insisted on maintaining the type of policy we've had with Cuba: No talk, no trade, no travel, no nothing. Nixon chose not to do that. The results are obvious. STILL did not accurately answer the question. Why are you ducking the correct answer? Surely a genius like YOU knows the correct answer. The answer is that Nixon thought we needed ties with China as a balance to Soviet misbehavior. But in pursuing this aim, he wrecked out economy forever. I guess you don't really know... |
I guess you aren't going to offer your explanation because that's your game.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.