Re: {OT:}New guidlines for "R" rated movies. - 05-22-2007 , 08:47 AM

"n5hsr" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message news:Fos4i.6360$ix.3936 (AT) trndny01 (DOT) .. On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:41:12 -0700, AnneCoultersAdamsApple wrote: On May 13, 11:00 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru... (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote: On Sun, 13 May 2007 20:33:59 -0500, dh wrote: "Hachiroku ????" <Tru... (AT) AE86 (DOT) gts> wrote in message news%g1i.1358$vu2.951 (AT) trndny01 (DOT) .. To paraphrase Rush: After the shooting, the drinking, the sex and the gore, All of which can still qualify an movie for an "R" whether the actors light up or not. Not often any more. if one of the actors lights up the movie gets an R rating. ___________________ Well, of course! We can't glamorize smoking! Promiscuous sex, sure! Drinking, sure! Violence and gore, sure! And why does Hollywood make these movies? Because you go to see them and you let your kids see them. BZZZZZZZTTT!!! WRONG! Last movie I saw with my kids was Aladdin... Or Lion King. Can't recall which came first. You are a real cultural maven. Well, you do spend all day typing simple sentences on the Internet. A. When I'm not fixing a car, reading a Tech manual, or writing software documentation, or playing bass. Most recent movies are for Dumb-Asses. You must be enjoying the hell out of them. Yes, I know what you mean. I'm trying to find a movie to take my date to of an evening but can't find anything worth my 10 bucks plus popcorn. Charles of Schaumburg

Let her pick the movie.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com