Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at???

#31

What in the heck does any of this have to do with Toyota?????

I just joined this newsgroup and almost half has to do with this?

"Scott in Florida" <JustAsk (AT) Florida (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

On 9 Nov 2005 19:29:52 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

Scott in Florida wrote:
On 8 Nov 2005 23:02:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

Bush is considered smart only at domestic political tactics, at most,
and it's well known he prefers to act unilaterally, as proved by his
rejection of the Kyoto treaty, termination of the SALT ABM
moratorium,
two issues that simply didn't matter enough to cause so much
resentment, and, most importantly, the invasion of Iraq.

Damned RIGHT....

The Kyoto treaty is a farce.

And its adoption wouldn't have affected our economy, while its
rejection just makes other nations angry and, much more importantly,
makes it harder for us to get countries like China to eventually clamp
down on global warming emissions.

The Kyoto treaty would not have affected our economy?

ROFLMAO

cite that one.....

You are truly a trip.....

Thanks for coming out to play....

--

Scott in Florida

#32

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 8 Nov 2005 23:02:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

Can you explain the low academic test scores of our high school
students compared to those in other developed countries or why
immigrants often consider our schools to be much easier?

Very simple.

You libs have run the American School Systems for the past 40 years.

Too simple. The more conservative states tend to have the worst test
scores.

#33

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 8 Nov 2005 23:02:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

Bush is considered smart only at domestic political tactics, at most,
and it's well known he prefers to act unilaterally, as proved by his
rejection of the Kyoto treaty, termination of the SALT ABM moratorium,
two issues that simply didn't matter enough to cause so much
resentment, and, most importantly, the invasion of Iraq.

Damned RIGHT....

The Kyoto treaty is a farce.

And its adoption wouldn't have affected our economy, while its
rejection just makes other nations angry and, much more importantly,
makes it harder for us to get countries like China to eventually clamp
down on global warming emissions.

#34

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 8 Nov 2005 23:02:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

You can't admire a man with so few admirable qualities and so few
achievements. He's acted irresponsibly, causing us to lose respect and
power in the world, and burden future generations with more debt than
any other administration, and he's divided the country, completely
excluding everybody who doesn't agree with him. He doesn't want to do
the hard, complex work to make the country better and views everything
only in terms of religion and politics. He's an unusually bad, selfish
President.

Oh my god.....

You truly are a liberal....

ROFMAO

GWB is selfish?

ROFLMAO

Bush said, "I'm not going to change my lifestyle," said during his
5-week French style summer vacation.

#35

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 9 Nov 2005 19:03:44 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

He had already given up his WMDs years before the war started.

That is totally not true!

cite!

David Kay, chief U.S. weapons inspector, said no WMDs had been found in
Iraq.

That is not a cite....please pay attention...

Please cite a better authority to counter this.

Better than David Kay? Who has more expertise on Iraqi WMDs than our
country's chief weapons inspector/

#36

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 9 Nov 2005 19:32:04 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

Scott in Florida wrote:
On 8 Nov 2005 23:02:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

GWB is selfish?

ROFLMAO

Bush said, "I'm not going to change my lifestyle," said during his
5-week French style summer vacation.

Oh my god....

You truly are a kook.....

ROFLMAO

Show proof that GW Bush is not a selfish, lazy, tantrum-prone brat in
an adult body. He and Clinton are walking examples of eternal
adolescence.

#37

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 8 Nov 2005 23:02:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

But memories live on, which is why people like Fidel Castro and Hugo
Chavez are able to hold power there. And we're still supporting
dictatorships elsewhere.

I've lived under a dictator [Spain 1970]....have you?

No, but my parents have, but how is any of this relevant? Also did you
live as an society insider, or were you a foreigner in Spain?

#38

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 8 Nov 2005 21:47:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

And what about our military?

Well lib....I have first hand knowledge of the United States
Military..

Two of my sons are in right now.

One in the Navy flying Seals around the world to kill terrorists.

Another in the Air Force in Korea.

They are READY!

They are ready, but are there enough of them in case a major regime
collapses or a dictatorship decides to exploit or preoccupation with
Iraq? Why have war veterans, such as former Generals Anthony Zinni,
Erik Shinseki, and Thomas White, said we're stretched too thin around
the world?

Quote:

My two sons are around the world and are ready if needed.

And we Americans should be grateful for their unselfish service.

Quote:

That is complete bull shit! They are more ready now than they have
ever been!

Are you saying our forces in Afghanistan are more ready now, despite at
least 5,000 having been diverted to the Iraqi war? How does having
fewer soldiers there make us more ready?

Quote:

such as aggression by North Korea or China or the collapse of the
regimes of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, and any of those will make
Iraq look like a Sunday picnic.

Oh my....;we should surrender and let Saddam open his rape rooms...

Why wasn't the Iraqi war over in a matter of days as predicted by
neocons like Paul "they'll greet us with open arms and flowers"
Wolfowitz and even John McCain? Was it because too few troops were
sent in?

Quote:

You libs are a total failure at everything you do!

We liberals failed with the Magna Carta, the Age of Enlightenment, the
Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, Abolition, the Marshall
Plan, and the Civil Rights Act.

Quote:

With Iraq we traded one madman who was under our control for tens of
thousands of madmen who are proving difficult to handle. Some of them
will create much bigger problems for us in the far future and not just
in Iraq.

Not if they are DEAD.....

Lock Load BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG

If it's that simple, why hasn't it been done? bin Laden hasn't been
found yet.

#39

Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:

On 8 Nov 2005 23:02:55 -0800, "Johnny Hageyama"
hageyama (AT) hairdresser (DOT) net> wrote:

WMDs include chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, and only the
latter truly matter, unless the former are shipped internationally,
which they were not.

Your stupidity is starting to show....

What happened in the Tokyo subway?

I'm referring to Saddam Hussein, not crazed blind masseurs who admire
Hitler.

#40

..dbu, wrote:

Quote:

In article <t2f2n11tnnv5kt7e3thcp8s9skjdi36egl (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>,
dizzy <dizzy (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote:

saddam housed abu nidal the big guy of terrorists.

Abu Nidal died in a "suicide" of the type so common in the
Middle East among people who disagree with the government,
most recently in Syria and Lebanon. In case you still don't
get the point, Saddam had Abu Nidal killed, which indicates
the two weren't cooperating with one another.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at???

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 10:25 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 10:26 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 10:29 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 10:32 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 10:44 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 10:47 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 10:50 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 11:11 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-09-2005 , 11:13 PM

Re: OT Why investigate what we already looked at??? - 11-10-2005 , 02:29 AM