Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules

#1

The environuts want us to breath every other day, to save the world. LOL

mike

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

In article <eY51i.14211$3P3.3086 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net>, C. E.
White wrote:

The Vermont trial began shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in an
unrelated case that carbon dioxide can be regulated as a pollutant,
rejecting a 2003 argument by the federal Environmental Protection Agency
that it did not have authority over carbon dioxide.

So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our
breathing? ?

#2

Whether one can take up smoking, or not, would depend on the city or state
in which one resides, wouldn't it?

By the way, when did CO2 become a pollutant. Like ozone the largest
producer of CO2
is nature, by far. Do the environuts now want the EPA to regulate nature?
If so, finally we have reached the point the nuts are actually running the
asylum LOL

mike

"Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:R8adnUzvwLWc2djbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...

So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our
breathing? ?

The EPA doesn't regulate your breathing. They do make it so you have clean
air to breath, though.

If you want to breath dirty air, take up smoking.

Jeff

#3

I remember when the Environmental Protection Act was enacted under the
auspiciousness of a Republican President. A friend remarked, finally the
federal government has done something to protect the people. A more astute
friend profoundly remarked, but who will protect the people from the EPA in
twenty years or so? LOL

mike

"Jeff" <news (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Zo6dnVogXaTSQdjbnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
In article <JBi1i.28755$Ae.7028@trnddc07>, Jeff wrote:

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:R8adnUzvwLWc2djbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
In article <eY51i.14211$3P3.3086 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net>, C.
E.
White wrote:

The Vermont trial began shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in
an
unrelated case that carbon dioxide can be regulated as a pollutant,
rejecting a 2003 argument by the federal Environmental Protection
Agency
that it did not have authority over carbon dioxide.

So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our
breathing? ?

No. However, the EPA does regulate the pollution that is put into the
atmosphere. For example, the EPA lowered the amount of sulfur oxides
that
are allowed to go into the atmosphere, thereby decreasing acid rain.

The EPA doesn't regulate your breathing. They do make it so you have
clean
air to breath, though.

If you want to breath dirty air, take up smoking.

Um... if the EPA is going to have the power to regulate CARBON DIOXIDE,
then can they regulate breathing which emits CARBON DIOXIDE? Have to
explain everything around here these days.

The EPA has the duty to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from inanimate
objects. However, it is not empowered to regulate breathing.

Besides, breathing doesn't create carbon dioxide. Breathing only rids the
blood of carbon dioxide made elsewhere in the body.

Jeff

#4

The environuts are applauding the PETA-nuts campaign to get people to eat
less beef, to reduce the number of cow farts, reduce pollution and save the
world

GMs secret plan to turn the corporation around,and reduce pollution in the
US at the same time, is to begin building all of their vehicles in China.
If they were smart the would move the corporate headquarters to Japan and
get all of those tax brakes and get away from paying US federal corporate
taxes The only problem is Toyota is already years ahead of them in plans
to build most of their vehicles in China by 2015 LOL

mike

"n5hsr" <n5hsr (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Zo6dnVogXaTSQdjbnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
In article <JBi1i.28755$Ae.7028@trnddc07>, Jeff wrote:

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:R8adnUzvwLWc2djbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
In article <eY51i.14211$3P3.3086 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net>, C.
E.
White wrote:

The Vermont trial began shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in
an
unrelated case that carbon dioxide can be regulated as a pollutant,
rejecting a 2003 argument by the federal Environmental Protection
Agency
that it did not have authority over carbon dioxide.

So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our
breathing? ?

No. However, the EPA does regulate the pollution that is put into the
atmosphere. For example, the EPA lowered the amount of sulfur oxides
that
are allowed to go into the atmosphere, thereby decreasing acid rain.

The EPA doesn't regulate your breathing. They do make it so you have
clean
air to breath, though.

If you want to breath dirty air, take up smoking.

Um... if the EPA is going to have the power to regulate CARBON DIOXIDE,
then can they regulate breathing which emits CARBON DIOXIDE? Have to
explain everything around here these days.

And let's see how long it takes before they try to regulate breathing.
Lesser beings will only be allowed to breathe on alternate days. No
Farting allowed.

So most of the left will be turning blue soon. Not soon enough.

Charles of Schaumburg

#5

"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

The environuts want us to breath every other day, to save the world. LOL

mike

Maybe they should lead by example here?

Charles of Schaumburg

#6

Ladies and Gentlemen (and I use those words loosely), in a sure sign
that the Apocalypse is upon us, someone calling themself Ted
Mittelstaedt said this in rec.autos.driving:

<< r.a.d removed >>

Quote:

Please, quit breathing so we don't have to listen to your
foolishness.

Please quit crossposting to r.a.d so I don't have to listen to yours.

--
D river
R eturns
O n
F oot

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)

Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules - 05-12-2007 , 03:09 PM

Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules - 05-12-2007 , 03:20 PM

Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules - 05-12-2007 , 03:29 PM

Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules - 05-12-2007 , 03:41 PM

Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules - 05-12-2007 , 03:43 PM

Re: Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules - 05-13-2007 , 07:43 AM