AutosTalk Forums  

Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate?

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Aratzio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-04-2005 , 11:36 AM






On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

Quote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as newsan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.

YHBT!

Yeah, I guess.

But you need a spell checker.

"Poast" is intentional.

Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!

That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)

Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.

You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!

One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.

You sprung it one or two posts too soon.

Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.

*blinks*

*ahem*

Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!


But an excellent job nonetheless!

You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)

Oh, it's alive and *very* well.


Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.

I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!

If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!
Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.

Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.

--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa (AT) dformosa (DOT) zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Aratzio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-04-2005 , 02:32 PM






On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

Quote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as newsan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.

YHBT!

Yeah, I guess.

But you need a spell checker.

"Poast" is intentional.

Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!

That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)

Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.

You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!

One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.

You sprung it one or two posts too soon.

Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.

*blinks*

*ahem*

Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!


But an excellent job nonetheless!

You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)

Oh, it's alive and *very* well.


Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.

I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!

If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!

Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.

Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.

And did you spot yourself out in the first?
Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?

Quote:
You're just an idiot.
"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"

PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?

--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa (AT) dformosa (DOT) zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Aratzio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-04-2005 , 09:35 PM



On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

Quote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as newsan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.

YHBT!

Yeah, I guess.

But you need a spell checker.

"Poast" is intentional.

Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!

That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)

Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.

You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!

One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.

You sprung it one or two posts too soon.

Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.

*blinks*

*ahem*

Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!


But an excellent job nonetheless!

You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)

Oh, it's alive and *very* well.


Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.

I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!

If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!

Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.

Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.

And did you spot yourself out in the first?

Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?

And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.
*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*

Quote:


You're just an idiot.

"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"

Yeah...and?
Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.

Quote:

PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?

Yeah...and?
Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts. Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.




--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa (AT) dformosa (DOT) zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Aratzio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-05-2005 , 08:55 AM



On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS>
transparently proposed:

Quote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as newsan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.

YHBT!

Yeah, I guess.

But you need a spell checker.

"Poast" is intentional.

Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!

That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)

Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.

You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!

One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.

You sprung it one or two posts too soon.

Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.

*blinks*

*ahem*

Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!


But an excellent job nonetheless!

You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)

Oh, it's alive and *very* well.


Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.

I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!

If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!

Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.

Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.

And did you spot yourself out in the first?

Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?

And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.

*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*




You're just an idiot.

"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"

Yeah...and?

Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.

Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?
Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?

Quote:



PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?

Yeah...and?

Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.

In your case, about a nanosecond.
Had it written down in your book of lamery.

Quote:
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.

You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.
*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?

Quote:
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?
Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.



--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa (AT) dformosa (DOT) zeta.org.au>

"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Aratzio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-06-2005 , 10:54 PM



On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

Quote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
transparently proposed:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as newsan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.

YHBT!

Yeah, I guess.

But you need a spell checker.

"Poast" is intentional.

Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!

That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)

Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.

You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!

One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.

You sprung it one or two posts too soon.

Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.

*blinks*

*ahem*

Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!


But an excellent job nonetheless!

You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)

Oh, it's alive and *very* well.


Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.

I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!

If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!

Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.

Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.

And did you spot yourself out in the first?

Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?

And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.

*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*




You're just an idiot.

"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"

Yeah...and?

Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.

Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?

Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?

Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?
Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?

Quote:
That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.
But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?

Quote:
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...
Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?

Quote:
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.
As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.

Quote:
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?
Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?

Quote:
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!

Quote:
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.
To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.

*snicker*


Quote:






PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?

Yeah...and?

Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.

In your case, about a nanosecond.

Had it written down in your book of lamery.


Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.

You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.

*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.

Quote:

See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?

Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.
Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.

--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa (AT) dformosa (DOT) zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Aratzio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-06-2005 , 11:57 PM



On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 04:13:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

Quote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:54:27 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
transparently proposed:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted
something accessible as newsan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.

YHBT!

Yeah, I guess.

But you need a spell checker.

"Poast" is intentional.

Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your
ass!

That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)

Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.

You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook,
line and sinker!

One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap
to be sprung.

You sprung it one or two posts too soon.

Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull
out early.

*blinks*

*ahem*

Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!


But an excellent job nonetheless!

You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling
is not lost!)

Oh, it's alive and *very* well.


Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.

I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!'
LOL!

If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!

Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.

Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.

And did you spot yourself out in the first?

Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?

And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.

*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*




You're just an idiot.

"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"

Yeah...and?

Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.

Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?

Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?

Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?

Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?

So what?
WHoa, incisive! I mean not like you've not used that everytime you
were stumped by facts.

Quote:

That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.

But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?

I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.
*snicker*
Which is why you post your *victolly* dances and screed bombs about
*the old days* blah blah blah.

Quote:


And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...

Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?


LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!
RUH ROH SCOOBY. Did you happen to work your way to the end, queeny?

I peeked, nope you did not. HEE HEE HEE. <preens>

Quote:


I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.

As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.

So?
Okay since you just admitted you have no clue what "responding by
proxy" means would you like it in words of less than two *sylabels*

Quote:


"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?

Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?

Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.
That would be due to brain damage from the constant bitch slappings.

So how did that whole "I'm hiding behing my killfile work out"?

Quote:


And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!

Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*SN ORK*HAHAHAHAHAHA

And you kept responding just like a little trained puppy. Does not
matter if you used someone elses post, you were responding to me. You
no more could stop reading what I wrote than stop taking a piss in the
morning. Plonk means, YOU stop reading and especially responding, not
me cupcake. I knew you were entirely too weak to actually plonk me.

Quote:


Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.

To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.

Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.
As pathetic a back pedal as I have seen since yesterday.

You do understand the usage of *pronouns*, sparkles? When you say *he*
rather than *you* that means you are no longer addressing me. So who
were you addressing, sparkles, since it was not me?

Quote:

*snicker*

Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
So how does that fit in with:
:"everyone else kills the thread"
You just wrote that and then contradicted yourself in the very next
paragraph. Just how fucking stupid are you?

Maybe they support you in email, yeah, that is it. You have supporters
not reading the thread laughing in emails. Is that how it works?

Quote:
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.
Winning what, sparkles? You see this as winning and losing? How
pathetic is that.

Quote:









PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles?

Yeah...and?

Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing
retorts.

In your case, about a nanosecond.

Had it written down in your book of lamery.


Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.

You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious.

*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.
Nope, you did not make it to the bottom. HEE HEE HEE.

Quote:


See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when
I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard
concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so?

Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.

Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.

--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa (AT) dformosa (DOT) zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Art Deco
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-07-2005 , 12:06 AM



Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:54:27 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
transparently proposed:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
posted
something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in
alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in
message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
posted
something accessible as
newsan.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS
in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:


Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature
of
the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context
for
the reast of my poasts in this thread.

YHBT!

Yeah, I guess.

But you need a spell checker.

"Poast" is intentional.

Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your
reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I
wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing
your
ass!

That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a
Troll. *THIS* one got me!)

Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been
trolled and have a sense of humor about it.

You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me
hook,
line and sinker!

One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three
more
posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone
savvy
would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the
trap
to be sprung.

You sprung it one or two posts too soon.

Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it,
so I pull
out early.

*blinks*

*ahem*

Um...yeah...Viagra may help that!


But an excellent job nonetheless!

You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of
Trolling
is not lost!)

Oh, it's alive and *very* well.


Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved.
There's
a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a
nuisance.
Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult
somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real
seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll
other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm
after
says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even
if you
told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one,
as
computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line
community
diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part.

I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat
true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I
haven't
been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good
old days!'
LOL!

If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you,
you're
wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!

Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard.

Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs.

And did you spot yourself out in the first?

Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle
when you stood up?

And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite
amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again.

*snorkle*
As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back
when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out
as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking
and cries of *victolly*.
*snorkle*




You're just an idiot.

"you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!"

Yeah...and?

Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are.

Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked?

Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup
snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How
about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept
responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is
just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi?

Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?

Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?

So what?


That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.

But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?

I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.



And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...

Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?


LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!



I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.

As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.

So?



"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?

Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?

Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.



And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!

Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.
Hi, Spank! Maybe someday you'll understand what the work means.
Quote:


Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.

To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.

Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.


*snicker*

Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.
I'll bet they all support you in email, too.
Quote:
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.
Yet here you are again.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004

"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Art Deco
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-07-2005 , 09:36 PM



Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:06:23 -0700, Art Deco wrote:



And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!

Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.

Hi, Spank! Maybe someday you'll understand what the work means.

I have no problem understanding work whatsoever.
And Now, The Typo Lame!
Quote:



Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.

To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.

Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.


*snicker*

Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.

I'll bet they all support you in email, too.

Why would they do that? Most of them don't even have my e-mail. Only a
couple, and we keep it to 'important' stuff, not what the Trolls do in the
group.
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH.
Quote:
Who cares?
You obviously do, Spank.
Quote:



But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with
a big red bow on it.

Yet here you are again.

Here *I* am again??? Oh, the Irony!
I got it now, you are the only person posting to usenet that has "a
life." Thanks, Spank.
Quote:

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."

Did it go fuck itself?
Did the quote marks confuse you, Spank?
Quote:

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004

"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004

"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Aratzio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: What is the proper way to self stimulate my own prostate? - 12-07-2005 , 10:40 PM



On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:17:44 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got
double secret probation because:

Quote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:57:14 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to?

Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond
*vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the
froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed
toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles?

So what?
^^^^^^^^^^^

WHoa, incisive! I mean not like you've not used that everytime you
were stumped by facts.

HAHAHAHA! WHAT facts? And it takes a lot more that you to 'stump' me.
So the whole "So what?" after responding to YOUR question means what,
bunky? I mean, you asked a question, I hammer the answer home and then
you respond with "So What". Which means you were left with no place to
go and had to pretend you had not really asked the question.

Quote:



That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play
there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are.

But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one
really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it,
pumpkin?

I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups
back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other.

*snicker*
Which is why you post your *victolly* dances and screed bombs about
*the old days* blah blah blah.

You mean, when Trolls had Brains?
Like you have even a niggling sense of what is either of those nouns.

Quote:



And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really
not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap
over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here...

Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized
responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever?


LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one!

RUH ROH SCOOBY. Did you happen to work your way to the end, queeny?

Nah...just the same old crap allover again, I'm sure.
Yeah, just more predictions about your responses. Spot on, again.
Quote:

I peeked, nope you did not. HEE HEE HEE. <preens


Getting the lice out of your feathers?
Wow, a toyota.tard (f)lame. Quite devastating. Bit of a stretch don't
ya think though, a bird, snicker. You would have look less lame with a
gay or drug lame.

Quote:



I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak
arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine.

As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of
being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant.

So?

Okay since you just admitted you have no clue what "responding by
proxy" means would you like it in words of less than two *sylabels*

Who said I have no clue? "so" means, "Who gives a Fuck?"
"Probably have not a clue what that statement meant."
"so?"/"Who gives a fuck?"

You still says you admit that you have not a clue.
"So, who gives a fuck I do not have a clue"

You do understand how English works and all, right? Oh, wait, no, you
just wrote you did not have a clue.

Quote:




"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what?

Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just
stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya?

Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around.

That would be due to brain damage from the constant bitch slappings.


Takes someone with a LOT more talent than you exhibit...
When I can make you do it to yourself, see above, then why would I
actually work at it?

Quote:

So how did that whole "I'm hiding behing my killfile work out"?

The difference being?
Umm, snuffles, point out the differential of the question I asked?
Difference to what, sparky?

The difference between your brain damage and hiding behind killfiles
is the best I could even find and I wrote the damn statement and
questions.
Quote:





And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would.
I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake".
Nothing new, just the same old crap.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE
RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU!

Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept
responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back.
Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little
mind.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*SN ORK*HAHAHAHAHAHA

And you kept responding just like a little trained puppy. Does not
matter if you used someone elses post, you were responding to me. You
no more could stop reading what I wrote than stop taking a piss in the
morning. Plonk means, YOU stop reading and especially responding, not
me cupcake. I knew you were entirely too weak to actually plonk me.


Who's the trained puppy? I remove the groups, you come back here and add
them in. Think you'd better take another assesment of the situation, Spot.
You sneck them so you can hide and pretend like you still have your
balls. I make sure they remain sitting upon my mantel in their glass
jar of formaldahyde.

Do you really think running and hiding after challenging people makes
you look smart?

Quote:




Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record.

To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience?
Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the
*audience*.

Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the
thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to
you.

As pathetic a back pedal as I have seen since yesterday.

Since the last time you posted?
Wow, Mr. Herman, quite the comeback there. I have never seen anyone
use an IKYABWAI lame in response.

So you never did get around to explaining who was the audience for
that statement.
Quote:

You do understand the usage of *pronouns*, sparkles? When you say *he*
rather than *you* that means you are no longer addressing me. So who
were you addressing, sparkles, since it was not me?

You got the idea. That's all that matters.
So you did have an audience in mind. Would that be the all the people
who have killed the thread or all the people you here laughing in
*your group*? Since it is the same people explain how you could have
both as you stated.

Quote:



*snicker*

Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too.

So how does that fit in with:
:"everyone else kills the thread"
You just wrote that and then contradicted yourself in the very next
paragraph. Just how fucking stupid are you?

They put up with you for a few posts, then get tired with you. I'm the
only one that feels like wasting time with you, cause you sit up and beg
so well...
LOL, another wonderful toyota.tard back pedal.
Quote:


Maybe they support you in email, yeah, that is it. You have supporters
not reading the thread laughing in emails. Is that how it works?


Even if they did I wouldn't read them.

And you aren't very observant, since they "support' me right out in the
open.
No, they do not. Not a one, well Stupid Dick, but he is a brain dead
winger.

So here is a little toyota.tard test:
"They put up with you for a few posts, then get tired with you."
"it's just you and me."
"everyone else kills the thread"
"everyone else in this group laughs at you"

So while you are busy making up support for your stupidity, do parse
those four sentences and get back to me when you spot the incredibly
obvious inconguity. I'll be here a while so go ahead and use both
brain cells.


Quote:

But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what
matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life
with a big red bow on it.

Winning what, sparkles? You see this as winning and losing? How pathetic
is that.

Who's talking about *victolly*? Not me. You seem to be obsessed with it.
Jebus fuck, please tell me you have never passed those genes on to any
poor unsuspecting child. That would be criminal.

Now, sparkles, go find anywhere where I used *victolly*. Read those
statements really careful, puddinhead. Parse them all the way to the
end. Make sure you tke note of the context and then get back to me
when you have figured out just how stupid was your preceding line.

Please also note the term is *victolly*. As a self described usenet
veteran you of course understand all about common usenet terminology.
Like what the derisive term *victolly* means? But the fact you tried
to use it to mean victory just compounds your obvious clueless nature.

Quote:











PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember,
sparkles?

Yeah...and?

Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those
scathing retorts.

In your case, about a nanosecond.

Had it written down in your book of lamery.


Now go with your standard "not worthy" response.

You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the
obvious.

*snorkle*
Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above.

Nope, you did not make it to the bottom. HEE HEE HEE.

Yeah, I saw it.
So you admit you were doing IKYABWAI lames. Pathetic.

Quote:
So, what? Glad to see you seem to know what the Whole of
Usenet thinks. Once again, who cares?
*BOGGLE*
"Whole usenet", jaysus, you really cannot read, can you? Where did I
even imply anything about the "whole usenet"?

Quote:




See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will,
then when I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not
such a hard concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you
so?

Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just
what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look
bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is
"Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk*
when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from
responding.

Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not
wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that
make you run away.
Gee, wonder why you avoided those paragraphs too. Been better if you
had snipped them and hoped I did not notice. I lie, I'd have put you
on the spit and rosted your lame ass.

--

Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005

Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae.fc2.dformosa (AT) dformosa (DOT) zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

http://www.tweaknet.info/aratzio.html


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.