![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: "Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news an.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTSin alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for the reast of my poasts in this thread. YHBT! Yeah, I guess. But you need a spell checker. "Poast" is intentional. Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your ass! That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a Troll. *THIS* one got me!) Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been trolled and have a sense of humor about it. You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook, line and sinker! One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap to be sprung. You sprung it one or two posts too soon. Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull out early. *blinks* *ahem* Um...yeah...Viagra may help that! But an excellent job nonetheless! You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling is not lost!) Oh, it's alive and *very* well. Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance. Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part. I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!' LOL! If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet! |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: "Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news an.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTSin alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for the reast of my poasts in this thread. YHBT! Yeah, I guess. But you need a spell checker. "Poast" is intentional. Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your ass! That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a Troll. *THIS* one got me!) Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been trolled and have a sense of humor about it. You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook, line and sinker! One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap to be sprung. You sprung it one or two posts too soon. Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull out early. *blinks* *ahem* Um...yeah...Viagra may help that! But an excellent job nonetheless! You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling is not lost!) Oh, it's alive and *very* well. Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance. Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part. I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!' LOL! If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet! Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard. Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs. And did you spot yourself out in the first? |
|
You're just an idiot. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: "Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news an.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTSin alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for the reast of my poasts in this thread. YHBT! Yeah, I guess. But you need a spell checker. "Poast" is intentional. Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your ass! That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a Troll. *THIS* one got me!) Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been trolled and have a sense of humor about it. You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook, line and sinker! One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap to be sprung. You sprung it one or two posts too soon. Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull out early. *blinks* *ahem* Um...yeah...Viagra may help that! But an excellent job nonetheless! You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling is not lost!) Oh, it's alive and *very* well. Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance. Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part. I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!' LOL! If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet! Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard. Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs. And did you spot yourself out in the first? Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle when you stood up? And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again. |
| You're just an idiot. "you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!" Yeah...and? |
| PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles? Yeah...and? |
#14
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: "Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news an.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTSin alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for the reast of my poasts in this thread. YHBT! Yeah, I guess. But you need a spell checker. "Poast" is intentional. Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your ass! That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a Troll. *THIS* one got me!) Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been trolled and have a sense of humor about it. You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook, line and sinker! One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap to be sprung. You sprung it one or two posts too soon. Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull out early. *blinks* *ahem* Um...yeah...Viagra may help that! But an excellent job nonetheless! You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling is not lost!) Oh, it's alive and *very* well. Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance. Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part. I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!' LOL! If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet! Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard. Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs. And did you spot yourself out in the first? Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle when you stood up? And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again. *snorkle* As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking and cries of *victolly*. *snorkle* You're just an idiot. "you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!" Yeah...and? Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are. Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked? |
| PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles? Yeah...and? Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing retorts. In your case, about a nanosecond. |
|
Now go with your standard "not worthy" response. You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious. |
|
See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so? |
#15
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS transparently proposed: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: "Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news an.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTSin alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for the reast of my poasts in this thread. YHBT! Yeah, I guess. But you need a spell checker. "Poast" is intentional. Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your ass! That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a Troll. *THIS* one got me!) Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been trolled and have a sense of humor about it. You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook, line and sinker! One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap to be sprung. You sprung it one or two posts too soon. Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull out early. *blinks* *ahem* Um...yeah...Viagra may help that! But an excellent job nonetheless! You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling is not lost!) Oh, it's alive and *very* well. Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance. Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part. I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!' LOL! If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet! Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard. Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs. And did you spot yourself out in the first? Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle when you stood up? And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again. *snorkle* As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking and cries of *victolly*. *snorkle* You're just an idiot. "you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!" Yeah...and? Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are. Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked? Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi? Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to? |
|
That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are. |
|
And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here... |
|
I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine. |
|
"You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what? |
|
And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would. I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake". Nothing new, just the same old crap. |
|
Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record. |
| PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles? Yeah...and? Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing retorts. In your case, about a nanosecond. Had it written down in your book of lamery. Now go with your standard "not worthy" response. You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious. *snorkle* Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so? Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is "Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk* when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from responding. |
#16
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:54:27 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS transparently proposed: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: "Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> posted something accessible as news an.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTSin alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for the reast of my poasts in this thread. YHBT! Yeah, I guess. But you need a spell checker. "Poast" is intentional. Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your ass! That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a Troll. *THIS* one got me!) Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been trolled and have a sense of humor about it. You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook, line and sinker! One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap to be sprung. You sprung it one or two posts too soon. Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull out early. *blinks* *ahem* Um...yeah...Viagra may help that! But an excellent job nonetheless! You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling is not lost!) Oh, it's alive and *very* well. Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance. Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part. I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!' LOL! If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet! Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard. Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs. And did you spot yourself out in the first? Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle when you stood up? And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again. *snorkle* As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking and cries of *victolly*. *snorkle* You're just an idiot. "you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!" Yeah...and? Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are. Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked? Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi? Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to? Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond *vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles? So what? |
| That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are. But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it, pumpkin? I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other. |
| And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here... Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever? LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one! |
| I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine. As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant. So? |
| "You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what? Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya? Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around. |
| And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would. I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake". Nothing new, just the same old crap. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU! Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back. Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little mind. |
| Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record. To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience? Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the *audience*. Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to you. |
| *snicker* Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too. |
|
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with a big red bow on it. |
| PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles? Yeah...and? Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing retorts. In your case, about a nanosecond. Had it written down in your book of lamery. Now go with your standard "not worthy" response. You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious. *snorkle* Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above. |
| See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so? Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is "Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk* when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from responding. Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that make you run away. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:54:27 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:55:00 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:55:48 +0000, Aratzio wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:24:50 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS transparently proposed: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:35:43 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:07:41 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:12 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:14:26 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:36:18 -0800, Aratzio wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:18:25 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS> got double secret probation because: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:06:46 GMT, "Hachiroku" <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS posted something accessible as news:W20kf.44$Qf5.40@trndny07 in alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: "Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuchanan (AT) neubauten (DOT) org> wrote in message news:GBSjf.98$EE4.81 (AT) news02 (DOT) roc.ny... On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:10:20 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTS posted something accessible as news an.2005.12.02.03.12.21.647873 (AT) ae86 (DOT) GTSin alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below: Mmm-hmm. Go back and look at the ROT-13 text in the signature of the poast you just responded to. Then consider that a context for the reast of my poasts in this thread. YHBT! Yeah, I guess. But you need a spell checker. "Poast" is intentional. Good for you! *YOU* got me. But your reference to "Ratz"? you're a MUCH better Troll than he is. I wouldn't even pay him the homage you did; he should be kissing your ass! That's more like it! Good job, my friend. (yes, I am praising a Troll. *THIS* one got me!) Well, thank you! I admire people who can admit that they've been trolled and have a sense of humor about it. You kidding, man? I was laffing my ass off last night! Had me hook, line and sinker! One thing I would have done, I would have gone out two or three more posts, getting a little more sardonic with each post. Someone savvy would pick up on the first, a dumbass would have to wait for the trap to be sprung. You sprung it one or two posts too soon. Agreed; I always worry that I'm not going to be able to hold it, so I pull out early. *blinks* *ahem* Um...yeah...Viagra may help that! But an excellent job nonetheless! You win the award for the year! (good to see the Fine Art of Trolling is not lost!) Oh, it's alive and *very* well. Not from what I've seen of the 'rat' pack. No cleverness involved. There's a great difference between hooking someone in and just being a nuisance. Most of tha tactics I have seen recently are just trying to insult somebody and trying to piss them off. Since I don't take Usenet real seriously, it doesn't work on me. I just get bored. Even when I troll other groups I use the same tactics. Of course, the hammerhead I'm after says he's a "Trollologist", but wouldn't know a good Trolling even if you told him YHBT. Like I said in a post to either Art or the other one, as computers become more prolific, the intelligence of the On-Line community diminishes. We can thank AOL for that for a large part. I know I often refer to the "good old days" but it's somewhat true...trolling isn't just saying something to piss someone off. I haven't been trolled like that in a while. <sigh? 'reminds me of the good old days!' LOL! If you can't laugh at yourself when someone's played a joke on you, you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet! Ah, more self serving tripe from the toyota.tard. Spot the irony of the last two paragraphs. And did you spot yourself out in the first? Poor baby, did you slip, fall and hurt yourself on all that spittle when you stood up? And you've just plain been outclassed. But do keep trying. It's quite amusing to see you posting the same trite crap over and over again. *snorkle* As opposed to your incessant declarations of *oldbie* status and *back when*. Or possibly your innumerable lame attemts to make yourself out as having even a modicum of humor. Or the predictable froup snecking and cries of *victolly*. *snorkle* You're just an idiot. "you're wrapped too tight and probably shouldn't be on Usenet!" Yeah...and? Ah, so sweet when they declare just what clueless spanktois they are. Maybe you'll convince yourself of that someday. Who have you spanked? Well, lets see, how about when I predicted you would start froup snecking and declare *victolly* and within 30 minutes you did. How about when you claimed you were not reading my posts and kept responding by proxy whining you were not reading my posts. That is just two. Would you like more my little spanktoi? Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to? Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond *vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles? So what? That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are. But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it, pumpkin? I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other. And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here... Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever? LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one! I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine. As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant. So? "You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what? Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya? Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around. And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would. I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake". Nothing new, just the same old crap. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU! Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back. Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little mind. |
| Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record. To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience? Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the *audience*. Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to you. *snicker* Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too. |
|
But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with a big red bow on it. |
#18
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:06:23 -0700, Art Deco wrote: And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would. I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake". Nothing new, just the same old crap. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU! Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back. Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little mind. Hi, Spank! Maybe someday you'll understand what the work means. I have no problem understanding work whatsoever. |
| Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record. To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience? Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the *audience*. Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to you. *snicker* Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too. I'll bet they all support you in email, too. Why would they do that? Most of them don't even have my e-mail. Only a couple, and we keep it to 'important' stuff, not what the Trolls do in the group. |
|
Who cares? |
| But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with a big red bow on it. Yet here you are again. Here *I* am again??? Oh, the Irony! |
| -- Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy "The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with both male and female genitalia." Did it go fuck itself? ![]() |
| "Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core." -- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004 "I am a sean being from another planet." -- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ... |
#19
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:57:14 -0800, Aratzio wrote: Why should I weant to respond to a bunch of groups I don't suscribe to? Like you can help yourself. You hide behind killfiles and respond *vicariously* (hee hee that one killed me). But no, you snecked the froups and declared *victolly* hoping no one from AUK had subbed toyota.tard.land. Not quite the same, now is it, sparkles? So what? ^^^^^^^^^^^ WHoa, incisive! I mean not like you've not used that everytime you were stumped by facts. HAHAHAHA! WHAT facts? And it takes a lot more that you to 'stump' me. |
| That one makes no sense at all. You wanna play in the Toyota group, play there. I don't really need your 'audience' to serve up what a fool you are. But you needed an audience to declare your *victolly* and hoped no one really saw you were running and hiding. Not quite the same, now is it, pumpkin? I don't need nothing. You need to feed your ego by putting all the groups back in. Personally, I really don't care one way or the other. *snicker* Which is why you post your *victolly* dances and screed bombs about *the old days* blah blah blah. You mean, when Trolls had Brains? |
| And you're wrong. I declared *victolly* in about 15 minutes. It's really not all that hard to best you...you just keep on with the ssame old crap over and over, just like you are now. Nothing new here... Wow, there be the PKB of the *weak*. Another of your oh so standarized responses. Has any of your lamery worked, ever? LOL! *YOU* talking about 'standardized responses'?! That's a GOOD one! RUH ROH SCOOBY. Did you happen to work your way to the end, queeny? Nah...just the same old crap allover again, I'm sure. |
| I peeked, nope you did not. HEE HEE HEE. <preens Getting the lice out of your feathers? |
| I wasn't reading your posts, I was reading other's responses to you weak arguements. Little bit of a difference there, Sunshine. As I said, you were "responding by proxy", reading impaired on top of being a liar. Probably have not a clue what that statement meant. So? Okay since you just admitted you have no clue what "responding by proxy" means would you like it in words of less than two *sylabels* Who said I have no clue? "so" means, "Who gives a Fuck?" |
| "You plonked me!!! You plonked me!!" Yeah, so what? Hee Hee, public plonkings and hoping against hope everyone will just stop smacking you around. Yeah, how's that workin out for ya? Who's smacking me around? I don't see anyone smacking me around. That would be due to brain damage from the constant bitch slappings. Takes someone with a LOT more talent than you exhibit... |
| So how did that whole "I'm hiding behing my killfile work out"? The difference being? |
| And as far as declaring *victolly* you did EXCATLY what I said you would. I'd say that amount of predictability puts you at a loss, "cupcake". Nothing new, just the same old crap. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA PLONK, NO REALLY I MEAN IT, STOP TALKING TO ME, WAAAAAAAA, YOU ARE RESPONDING AND I PLONKED YOU! Yup...exactly. Even though you've been told you were plonked you kept responding and kept responding. And still you just keep on coming back. Maybe the way you entered it above is the way it played in your little mind. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*SN ORK*HAHAHAHAHAHA And you kept responding just like a little trained puppy. Does not matter if you used someone elses post, you were responding to me. You no more could stop reading what I wrote than stop taking a piss in the morning. Plonk means, YOU stop reading and especially responding, not me cupcake. I knew you were entirely too weak to actually plonk me. Who's the trained puppy? I remove the groups, you come back here and add them in. Think you'd better take another assesment of the situation, Spot. |
| Sheesh, he's like a broken fucking record. To whom are you addressing that, stumpy, your voices or your audience? Not that you would be attempting to garner sympathy from the *audience*. Not my audience. As soon as you come around, everyone else kills the thread. Nope, sorry 'cupcake' it's just you and me. I'm addressing it to you. As pathetic a back pedal as I have seen since yesterday. Since the last time you posted? |
| You do understand the usage of *pronouns*, sparkles? When you say *he* rather than *you* that means you are no longer addressing me. So who were you addressing, sparkles, since it was not me? You got the idea. That's all that matters. |
| *snicker* Yeah, everyone else in this group laughs at you, too. So how does that fit in with: :"everyone else kills the thread" You just wrote that and then contradicted yourself in the very next paragraph. Just how fucking stupid are you? They put up with you for a few posts, then get tired with you. I'm the only one that feels like wasting time with you, cause you sit up and beg so well... |
| Maybe they support you in email, yeah, that is it. You have supporters not reading the thread laughing in emails. Is that how it works? Even if they did I wouldn't read them. And you aren't very observant, since they "support' me right out in the open. |
| But that's OK, you just keep on thinking you're 'winning'. That is what matters, isn't it? Christmas is coming, too. Maybe you'll get a life with a big red bow on it. Winning what, sparkles? You see this as winning and losing? How pathetic is that. Who's talking about *victolly*? Not me. You seem to be obsessed with it. |
| PSST: I am plonked and you do not respond to me, remember, sparkles? Yeah...and? Wow, such insight and wit. How many hours you work on those scathing retorts. In your case, about a nanosecond. Had it written down in your book of lamery. Now go with your standard "not worthy" response. You seem to understand that already. I hate to keep stating the obvious. *snorkle* Was being a predictable and lame wanker a lifelong dream of yours? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hmm, no response. But it did get some nice IKYABWAI lamery above. Nope, you did not make it to the bottom. HEE HEE HEE. Yeah, I saw it. |
|
So, what? Glad to see you seem to know what the Whole of Usenet thinks. Once again, who cares? |
| See, I know how to use my newsreader. I can unplonk you at will, then when I tire of your assinine rantings, plonk you again. Not such a hard concept to grasp, really. Why does it seem to bother you so? Except anyone with a clue and is not a total moron understands just what *plonk* means. To you it means *i'm scared and you make me look bad so I will hide you from me*. To the nonspanktoi usenet it is "Jebus Fuck, you are lame, go away" and there you stay. No *unplonk* when you realize it did not work and you cannot keep yourself from responding. Wow, that is like a whole paragraph of spank that you just could not wrap your pidgeon head around. Must be those *weak* arguments that make you run away. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |