AutosTalk Forums  

Roadster Choice

Toyota Discussions related to Toyota cars and trucks (alt.autos.toyota)


Discuss Roadster Choice in the Toyota forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Tegger®
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-20-2004 , 08:36 AM






"Bernard Farquart" <bfarquart (AT) notmyemail (DOT) net> spake unto the masses in
news:qq3hc.23473$G_.19948 (AT) nwrddc02 (DOT) gnilink.net:

Quote:
"Tegger®" <teggeratistopdotcom (AT) changetheobvious (DOT) invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D0CA473F435teggeratistop (AT) 207 (DOT) 14.113.17...
"D.B. Cooper" <mnospam%no@mnospam%no.com> spake unto the masses in
news:qaJgc.289$gH6.53 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net:

a Datsun that once emulated a Mustang fastback.



You're thinking of the '75-'78 Celica. The '74 and earlier resembled a
Dodge Challenger.

The Toyota 2000GT and Datsun 240Z evoked the Ferrari GTO.



Certainly the MR2's
hood is a snatch of the early long hood 911/912's.

Don't forget that cool copy of a triumph that Datsun
made in the late 60's and called an 1800,


Wasn't that the original Fairlady? It was superseded by the 240Z.

Believe it or not, the 240Z was originally called the Fairlady for the US
market, as it was elsewhere.

Nissan ignored the warnings of Yutaka Katayama, the engineer in charge of
the US market, who wanted the Fairlady badges left off at the factory. He
thought Americans (and Canadians) would see the name as being effeminate,
which was not the image he wanted for his car.

The very first 240Zs in America had their Fairlady badges removed at the
dock by Katayama before being released to the dealers.

What might have been, eh?

--
TeGGeR®


How to find anything on the Internet or in Usenet Groups:
www.google.com
www.groups.google.com


Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
E Brown
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-20-2004 , 09:17 AM






On 20 Apr 2004 12:36:42 GMT, "Tegger®"
<teggeratistopdotcom (AT) changetheobvious (DOT) invalid> wrote:


Quote:
Don't forget that cool copy of a triumph that Datsun
made in the late 60's and called an 1800,



Wasn't that the original Fairlady? It was superseded by the 240Z.

The convertible was called the Fairlady in Japan and (I think)
Europe, but just had the umber designation over here. Rare in the US.
Emanuel
--
1983 Porsche 911
1983 Porsche 944


Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-24-2004 , 02:59 PM



Get a 'real' Roadster, a Porsche one at that. The Porsche Roadster for the
model years of 1959-1962.

"Bernard Farquart" <bfarquart (AT) notmyemail (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
"Tegger®" <teggeratistopdotcom (AT) changetheobvious (DOT) invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D0CA473F435teggeratistop (AT) 207 (DOT) 14.113.17...
"D.B. Cooper" <mnospam%no@mnospam%no.com> spake unto the masses in
news:qaJgc.289$gH6.53 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net:

a Datsun that once emulated a Mustang fastback.



You're thinking of the '75-'78 Celica. The '74 and earlier resembled a
Dodge Challenger.

The Toyota 2000GT and Datsun 240Z evoked the Ferrari GTO.



Certainly the MR2's
hood is a snatch of the early long hood 911/912's.

Don't forget that cool copy of a triumph that Datsun
made in the late 60's and called an 1800, and a 2000.
That, in my opinion, was one of the best knock-offs
ever, cause it was actually an improvement, from a
reliability standpoint.

Bernard






Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
Joseph Oberlander
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-24-2004 , 05:02 PM





jwjensen356 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net wrote:

Quote:
Get a 'real' Roadster, a Porsche one at that. The Porsche Roadster for the
model years of 1959-1962.
Austin Healeys are also cool.

I saw a mint condition Mercedes 100 series roadster(circa 1965, IIRC)
on the road the other day. Very cool as well.



Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
Dan Gates
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-26-2004 , 09:27 AM



Joseph Oberlander wrote:

Quote:

jwjensen356 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net wrote:

Get a 'real' Roadster, a Porsche one at that. The Porsche Roadster
for the
model years of 1959-1962.


Austin Healeys are also cool.

I saw a mint condition Mercedes 100 series roadster(circa 1965, IIRC)
on the road the other day. Very cool as well.

I have been lusting after a 3000 MkIII for years and years - the one
where the 3 litre 6 has 3-twin-choke carbs!

My wife's business isn't successful enough for that yet!

Dan


Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old   
Scott in Florida
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-26-2004 , 10:46 AM



On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:27:15 -0400, Dan Gates <drgates (AT) magma (DOT) ca>
wrote:

Quote:
Joseph Oberlander wrote:



jwjensen356 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net wrote:

Get a 'real' Roadster, a Porsche one at that. The Porsche Roadster
for the
model years of 1959-1962.


Austin Healeys are also cool.

I saw a mint condition Mercedes 100 series roadster(circa 1965, IIRC)
on the road the other day. Very cool as well.


I have been lusting after a 3000 MkIII for years and years - the one
where the 3 litre 6 has 3-twin-choke carbs!

My wife's business isn't successful enough for that yet!

Dan
Me too... there isn't a neater sound that that six!!!

Get your wife busy and we'll go out and get two of em!! <g>


Scott in Florida


Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old   
Dan Gates
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-26-2004 , 01:39 PM



Scott in Florida wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:27:15 -0400, Dan Gates <drgates (AT) magma (DOT) ca
wrote:


Joseph Oberlander wrote:



jwjensen356 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net wrote:


Get a 'real' Roadster, a Porsche one at that. The Porsche Roadster
for the
model years of 1959-1962.


Austin Healeys are also cool.

I saw a mint condition Mercedes 100 series roadster(circa 1965, IIRC)
on the road the other day. Very cool as well.


I have been lusting after a 3000 MkIII for years and years - the one
where the 3 litre 6 has 3-twin-choke carbs!

My wife's business isn't successful enough for that yet!

Dan


Me too... there isn't a neater sound that that six!!!

Get your wife busy and we'll go out and get two of em!! <g


Scott in Florida
My best buddy in high school had MGs, GT6s etc. He got a line on a 6000
MKIII that was in pieces - mid restore - from a guy up country whose
wife had said "too many toys". The seller had two of the 3-wheel
triumphs and several other things that I forget now. He would only sell
it to my buddy because my buddy promised that he would restore it and
look after it.

It arrived on two trailers and sat in his parent's garage for a couple
of months.

He sold it for $2k more than he paid for it, the only thing he added was
the sand from the garage floor!

All of the mechanicals had been replaced, repaired etc. and just needed
to be put back together. Most of the bodywork was done, it just needed
final sanding and painting.

Oh to have that now!

Dan


Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old   
Scott in Florida
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 04-26-2004 , 04:10 PM



On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:39:27 -0400, Dan Gates <drgates (AT) magma (DOT) ca>
wrote:

Quote:
Scott in Florida wrote:

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:27:15 -0400, Dan Gates <drgates (AT) magma (DOT) ca
wrote:


Joseph Oberlander wrote:



jwjensen356 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net wrote:


Get a 'real' Roadster, a Porsche one at that. The Porsche Roadster
for the
model years of 1959-1962.


Austin Healeys are also cool.

I saw a mint condition Mercedes 100 series roadster(circa 1965, IIRC)
on the road the other day. Very cool as well.


I have been lusting after a 3000 MkIII for years and years - the one
where the 3 litre 6 has 3-twin-choke carbs!

My wife's business isn't successful enough for that yet!

Dan


Me too... there isn't a neater sound that that six!!!

Get your wife busy and we'll go out and get two of em!! <g


Scott in Florida

My best buddy in high school had MGs, GT6s etc. He got a line on a 6000
MKIII that was in pieces - mid restore - from a guy up country whose
wife had said "too many toys". The seller had two of the 3-wheel
triumphs and several other things that I forget now. He would only sell
it to my buddy because my buddy promised that he would restore it and
look after it.

It arrived on two trailers and sat in his parent's garage for a couple
of months.

He sold it for $2k more than he paid for it, the only thing he added was
the sand from the garage floor!

All of the mechanicals had been replaced, repaired etc. and just needed
to be put back together. Most of the bodywork was done, it just needed
final sanding and painting.

Oh to have that now!

Dan
I owned two 'British Racing Green' 64 1/2 Mustangs with three on the
floor and the original Mustang 260 V8....to have either of them
now....

My dad had a Austin Healy Sprite (Bug Eye). Not a performance auto,
for sure...but a hell of a lot of fun to drive.

Oh well...

Now I've got a '92 Corolla wagon which can't be replaced for another
10 years...LOL


Scott in Florida


Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old   
Nick Trounson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Roadster Choice - 05-05-2004 , 02:52 AM



"Scott in Florida" <NotInThisLifetime (AT) nope (DOT) ucan't> wrote

Quote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:39:27 -0400, Dan Gates <drgates (AT) magma (DOT) ca
wrote:

Scott in Florida wrote:

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:27:15 -0400, Dan Gates <drgates (AT) magma (DOT) ca
wrote:


Joseph Oberlander wrote:



jwjensen356 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net wrote:


Get a 'real' Roadster, a Porsche one at that. The Porsche Roadster
for the
model years of 1959-1962.


Austin Healeys are also cool.

I saw a mint condition Mercedes 100 series roadster(circa 1965, IIRC)
on the road the other day. Very cool as well.


I have been lusting after a 3000 MkIII for years and years - the one
where the 3 litre 6 has 3-twin-choke carbs!

My wife's business isn't successful enough for that yet!

Dan


Me too... there isn't a neater sound that that six!!!

Get your wife busy and we'll go out and get two of em!! <g


Scott in Florida

My best buddy in high school had MGs, GT6s etc. He got a line on a 6000
MKIII that was in pieces - mid restore - from a guy up country whose
wife had said "too many toys". The seller had two of the 3-wheel
triumphs and several other things that I forget now. He would only sell
it to my buddy because my buddy promised that he would restore it and
look after it.

It arrived on two trailers and sat in his parent's garage for a couple
of months.

He sold it for $2k more than he paid for it, the only thing he added was
the sand from the garage floor!

All of the mechanicals had been replaced, repaired etc. and just needed
to be put back together. Most of the bodywork was done, it just needed
final sanding and painting.

Oh to have that now!

Dan

I owned two 'British Racing Green' 64 1/2 Mustangs with three on the
floor and the original Mustang 260 V8....to have either of them
now....

My dad had a Austin Healy Sprite (Bug Eye). Not a performance auto,
for sure...but a hell of a lot of fun to drive.

Oh well...

Now I've got a '92 Corolla wagon which can't be replaced for another
10 years...LOL


Scott in Florida
Searching the 'net for information on the Toyota 2TG (as I do often)
revealed an American dude who'd slammed a big T-block into his MG Midget...
isn't that a scary thought? Japanese 1600 twincam performance and
reliability in a British car... :-)


Nick.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.631 / Virus Database: 404 - Release Date: 17/03/2004




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.