AutosTalk Forums  

VW seems to have lost it's way in the US

Volkswagen Golf, Jetta, Corrado, Vanagon, new models, etc. (rec.autos.makers.vw.watercooled)


Discuss VW seems to have lost it's way in the US in the Volkswagen forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old   
Steve Grauman
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 03:06 AM






Quote:
aceleration is not all... but seems to be all americans care right now
That's not only the truth, it's my point. SUVs and sports/sporty coupes are
what the American market is asking for right now and VW isn't coming real
strong with the compacts. The Touraeg is an *awesome* vehicle, but you need the
V8 for worthwhile performance and that means $40-41k before options.


Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old   
sd
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 08:53 AM






In article <10804akppe50l40 (AT) news (DOT) supernews.com>,
Mike Smith <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith (AT) acm (DOT) DOT.org> wrote:

Quote:
Before I bought my Jetta TDI, I test-drove a Ford Contour V6. That car
was a blast to drive. But I could tell from poking around it that it
would not be fun to have to repair after a few years. I bought the VW.
Obviously I'm not in the gunsights of the SRT-4/WRX market.

A curious pairing of cars, there. Why not a Jetta w/VR6 to compare
against the Contour V6?
Actually, I was replacing an '89 (gas) Jetta, and was looking
primarily at the 2.0-liter gas-engined Jetta A4 as a straight
replacement. The V-6 Contour cost about the same, so I compared it
rather than the 4-cylinder Contour. But I didn't like the Contour's
build quality. Unfortunately, I didn't like the performance of the
2.0-liter VW engine (or the relatively poor gas mileage, which you
would think would be better for that engine). The 1.8T was not
available when I bought my first TDI, and the VR-6 was significantly
more expensive than either. So it was on to the TDI. Yeah, it's a
strange pairing. But maybe the thought processes help explain it.

sd


Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old   
Rob Guenther
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 10:50 AM



There isn't a big difference driving NORMALLY, ie not flooring it to get to
100kph very VERY fast.... I don't know about you but I don't have to floor
my 90 horsepower diesel to get on the 400 series highways (similar to
interstates) unless the onramps are REALLY short.... These cars I find you
barely have to give more then 1/2 throttle.

I find the Passat had a more flexible engine.

Hell, i've driven a Volvo V70 2,4T with 197 hp and 210lb-ft of torque, and
it felt even better then either one of those cars (and yah the Accord would
still spank it in a 0-100kph test). Its the torque range that's important,
not the HP it produces at 6000+ rpm.

And when did I disagree that it would lose in the performance dept? cuz I
didn't I just said the reduced power doesn't make a huge difference driven
normally.
"Steve Grauman" <oneactor1 (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
I've been in both cars... and unless you reall press the Accord hard, and
get way into its RPM band to get the VTEC to start really kicking in,
there
isn't a huge difference...

What?? Have you really been in both cars? Cause' I've driven both and this
isn;t the case. The Passat V6 FWD with Tiptronic needs 8.0 seconds or mor
for
60MPh, the Accord doe it in 7.1. The Passat is a DAMN FINE car, but it's
gonna
lose in the performance department.



Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old   
Rob Guenther
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 10:55 AM



Whens the last time you saw one of those 3+ litre midsized cars flooring it
to get on the highway, or jackrabbit starting at a stoplight to get
ahead.... I've RARELY seen it... In everyday situations the TDI motor cars
will not leave you feeling shorthanded.... In fact I seem to get stuck
behind the biggest most powerfull midsize cars on on-ramps, this could be
because I need more run-up room right after the bend, but still... It really
doesn't matter how much power you got, it doesn't make a huge difference
unless you're racing.

Maybe you need to stop comparing cars based PURELY on how fast they will go
when pushed.
"Steve Grauman" <oneactor1 (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
There is this thing called economics.

I'm aware of economics, and more specifically profit managment which is
what
you're writing about. VW would be making a LOT more money every year if
they
could design a car that would sell like the Camry and Accord.

You don't need 240 hp in a small car. You want. I want too but not
really.

Want and need are different things, and EVERYBODY wants. The current
market (at
least here in the U.S.) is demanding as much power as possible at as low a
price as possible, and the Passat isn't keeping up. The Camry SE with the
3.3
litre motor now makes over 220Hp, the Accord, Galant, Altima and Maxima
have
anywhere from 240 to 260Hp. And Acur'a TL has 270, and it's very similarly
priced to a loaded Passat GLX V6 w/ Tiptronic.

I rarely drove my GTI hard enough to use its power. The TDI
has enough power for the way I drive.

I'm always amazed that Europeans seem to think the TDi is a good
performer. The
accleration numbers on that thing are hardly impressive. My 1.8T is
considerablly faster for marginally more. It's the Fuel consumption of the
TDi
that makes it worthwhile.



Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old   
Rob Guenther
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 10:55 AM



Probably some options and trims on the inside... seems redundant tho doesn't
it.
"Randolph" <trash (AT) junkmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
The German VW web site (http://www.volkswagen.de) shows both a Bora
Variant and a Golf Variant. One might think it is an A4 / A5 issue, but
both the Golf Variant and the Bora Variant are A4 cars. The Bora Variant
retains the squarish headlights from the Bora / Jetta and the Golf
Variant keeps the more oval shaped Golf headlights. That would be the
only difference I could see from the photos on the site.

Rob Guenther wrote:

They have the Golf Varient over there.... Not sure of they have the Bora
Varient (as it would be VERY redundant) but the ones shipped here are
made
in Germany... at least all the ones I have seen are.
"Brian Running" <brunning (AT) tds (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:4081402b$1_2 (AT) newspeer2 (DOT) tds.net...
Yah the Bora/Jetta I believe does, but it's not very popular (from
what
I
have heard from family/friends who live, or have been to Germany)
over
there, the Golf sells WAY more units, and is German built. The Jetta
wagon,
interestingly enough is German built, a friend of mine has a 2003
and it
has
a WVW VIN number.

I understand the "Jetta" wagon is called a "Golf" wagon, or estate, or
whatever terminology they use for "wagon." Not a Jetta/Bora.





Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old   
jimbehning@doesthisblockporkmindspring.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 05:42 PM



First off I am not a European.

I have driven cars with 383 Magnums and 440 Magnums, trucks with 396s,
Camaros with hopped up 350s. I have no need for such raw acceleration.
I am not in some freaking race to do my job of going back an forth to
work. The only people that need that are the folks out on the
racetrack. Sure I might want raw acceleration but I want better milage
more. Just because some small percentage of folks want 300 plus
horsepower in a pickup truck does not mean that the bulk of the market
does. I don't want a huge gas or diesel engine in a Tourag. I want a
decent size diesel that would let me pull 5,000 lbs safely. Not drag
race the stupid truck but safely pull the trailer.

Once again there is not proof that dropping some rediculous
unneccessary engine in some wacked out new every 4 years body style is
going to make VW the largest seller of vehicles in America. Or more
important a more profitable company. Who want to be the largest?
Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborgini sure don't care. I would rather have a
Porsche than some VW but a car is not something worth hanging some
silly ego to for me. It is transportation. It is for lots of people
otherwise the Taurus and Camray would not sell so well.

I test drove the 1.8T. I have no need for such acceleration. I doubt
that anyone could prove that they need such acceleration. What do you
do that you need a car that can do a quarter mile in 15 seconds? I can
accelerate to highway speeds at part throttle with a TDI. I can
accerate briskly enough with full throttle. I can maintain 80 mph with
ease. What more do I need?

oneactor1 (AT) aol (DOT) com (Steve Grauman) wrote:

Quote:
There is this thing called economics.

I'm aware of economics, and more specifically profit managment which is what
you're writing about. VW would be making a LOT more money every year if they
could design a car that would sell like the Camry and Accord.

You don't need 240 hp in a small car. You want. I want too but not
really.

Want and need are different things, and EVERYBODY wants. The current market (at
least here in the U.S.) is demanding as much power as possible at as low a
price as possible, and the Passat isn't keeping up. The Camry SE with the 3.3
litre motor now makes over 220Hp, the Accord, Galant, Altima and Maxima have
anywhere from 240 to 260Hp. And Acur'a TL has 270, and it's very similarly
priced to a loaded Passat GLX V6 w/ Tiptronic.

I rarely drove my GTI hard enough to use its power. The TDI
has enough power for the way I drive.

I'm always amazed that Europeans seem to think the TDi is a good performer. The
accleration numbers on that thing are hardly impressive. My 1.8T is
considerablly faster for marginally more. It's the Fuel consumption of the TDi
that makes it worthwhile.

Jim B.


Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old   
Matt B.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 10:08 PM



"Rob Guenther" <robertguenther (AT) sympatico (DOT) ca> wrote

Quote:
Yah the Bora/Jetta I believe does, but it's not very popular (from what I
have heard from family/friends who live, or have been to Germany) over
there, the Golf sells WAY more units, and is German built.

Yes although the Golf has always been more popular than the Jetta/Vento/Bora
overseas.

Quote:
The Jetta wagon, interestingly enough is German built, a friend of mine has
a 2003 and it has a WVW VIN number.

As are all Jetta wagons in North America.




Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old   
Matt B.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 10:10 PM



"Brian Running" <brunning (AT) tds (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Yah the Bora/Jetta I believe does, but it's not very popular (from what
I
have heard from family/friends who live, or have been to Germany) over
there, the Golf sells WAY more units, and is German built. The Jetta
wagon,
interestingly enough is German built, a friend of mine has a 2003 and it
has
a WVW VIN number.

I understand the "Jetta" wagon is called a "Golf" wagon, or estate, or
whatever terminology they use for "wagon." Not a Jetta/Bora.
There are both Golf and Bora versions...same cars, different noses, and the
Bora versions tend to be more upscale in trim. Both I think are called
"Variant" (e.g.: Golf Variant and Bora Variant).




Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old   
Steve Grauman
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 10:29 PM



Quote:
There isn't a big difference driving NORMALLY
I'm not going to debate this any furthur with you other than to say I drove
both cars back to back and the difference is noticeable. The Accord's seemingly
low 212 Ft. Lbs. of torque is still more than the Passat's peak ouput and the
added displacement (3.0 Vs. 2.8) helps offset the Hond's tendancy to want to
revv out. Their also compareable in weight and the Passat's Tiptronic is oddly
slow and clumsy in Automatic mode, something that has been commented on in
numerous writeups and kills a lot of it's appeal. The Accord's automatic is
well suited to it's engine and I found it far less difficult to acclerate and
pass with than much smaller engined Preludes, Civics, and Integra/RSXs and even
the Passat to some degree. The Passat is one of the slowest selling vehicles of
it's price and type in North America and it's partly because VW isn;t matching
the priceerformance ratio of cars like the Accord.


Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old   
Steve Grauman
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VW seems to have lost it's way in the US - 04-18-2004 , 10:32 PM



Quote:
Maybe you need to stop comparing cars based PURELY on how fast they will go
The Passat feels limp wristed, weak and generally sub-par when compared to the
Honda. In fact I can say even as a VW fan that the Accord has got the Passat
beaten everywhere except build quality and the differences are hardly worth
talking about. I drove both cars back to back and I know which one I'd take -
hands down. If it were a comparison of Golf Vs. Civic, I'd feel differently.


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.