![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Dave wrote: Chicago Paddling-Fishing <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote: Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? I'm disappointed ... There is one. It's called the TDI. The Twincharger isn't so bad, either. Too bad VW hates Americans. -- Mike Smith |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Dave wrote: Chicago Paddling-Fishing <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote: Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? I'm disappointed ... There is one. It's called the TDI. The Twincharger isn't so bad, either. Too bad VW hates Americans. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Regal53 <Regal53 (AT) bellsouth (DOT) net> wrote: : The number of cylinders of an engine do not necessarily equate miles per : gallon; Audi motto in the 1980's was "four are too few, six are too many" to : market the type 43 audi 5000. So my 1987 5000 quattro CS turbo has a 2.2L : 5-cylinder, while my 1984 Porsche 944 had a 2.5L 4-cylinder motor. The audi : gets better mpg with 1 more cylinder. It's about displacement, volumetric : efficiency. Sadly, the vw doesn't get better mileage, unless you consider 22/30 better... (it's worse than last years models at a time when we really shouldn't be going that direction) The Focus has a 2.0l 4 cylinder with 136hp getting 27/37mpg, the Rabbit has a 2.5l 5 cylinder with 150hp getting 22/30mpg... neither requires premium... We are just hitting 70k miles on our 2000 Focus and so far, we have only paid to replaced brakes and rear wheel bearings, not bad for a 6 year old car driven by my teenage daughter... i can't fairly compare it against my 86 GTI though, as it's been thru some major repairs and is driven by my teenage son... I'll have to go drive one, but I'm not expecting to feel much difference between 136hp and 150hp, but I would feel $10 difference in gas every fillup pretty quickly... -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
VW is a performance car company first and foremost. They also change direction very slowly. I would imagine we will see smaller engines from VW , or even another smaller car, in a few to 5 years. Of course that's if gas stays about 3-4 bucks a gallon. |
|
If you want better gas mileage , you know what to do. I,m not going to bash the Focus. It works for you. But it is a mediocre car at best, that finally has most of the bugs out of it. The Escort was a better car all the way around. And there are better cars , that cost less, are more reliable and get better mileage, then the Focus. Ford and GM are in a world of hurt because they lack a world class small car. Really, they only have about 2-3 cars between them that people actually want. "Chicago Paddling-Fishing" <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote in message news:ed5pgn$5j5$1 (AT) e250 (DOT) ripco.com... Regal53 <Regal53 (AT) bellsouth (DOT) net> wrote: The number of cylinders of an engine do not necessarily equate miles per gallon; Audi motto in the 1980's was "four are too few, six are too many" to market the type 43 audi 5000. So my 1987 5000 quattro CS turbo has a 2.2L 5-cylinder, while my 1984 Porsche 944 had a 2.5L 4-cylinder motor. The audi gets better mpg with 1 more cylinder. It's about displacement, volumetric efficiency. Sadly, the vw doesn't get better mileage, unless you consider 22/30 better... (it's worse than last years models at a time when we really shouldn't be going that direction) The Focus has a 2.0l 4 cylinder with 136hp getting 27/37mpg, the Rabbit has a 2.5l 5 cylinder with 150hp getting 22/30mpg... neither requires premium... We are just hitting 70k miles on our 2000 Focus and so far, we have only paid to replaced brakes and rear wheel bearings, not bad for a 6 year old car driven by my teenage daughter... i can't fairly compare it against my 86 GTI though, as it's been thru some major repairs and is driven by my teenage son... I'll have to go drive one, but I'm not expecting to feel much difference between 136hp and 150hp, but I would feel $10 difference in gas every fillup pretty quickly... -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mike Smith wrote: Dave wrote: Chicago Paddling-Fishing <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote: Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? I'm disappointed ... There is one. It's called the TDI. The **Twincharger** isn't so bad, either. Too bad VW hates Americans. Maybe it is America that hates clean air. VW can't import cars into the US if the US does not have fuel clean enough for them. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'll have to go drive one, but I'm not expecting to feel much difference between 136hp and 150hp |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote: Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? I'm disappointed ... Well I have not heard that, but no matter. Additional cylinders means less vibration for the same power. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
VW is a performance car company first and foremost. They also change direction very slowly. I would imagine we will see smaller engines from VW , or even another smaller car, in a few to 5 years. |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? I'm disappointed ... -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |