AutosTalk Forums  

Why 5 cylinders?

Volkswagen Golf, Jetta, Corrado, Vanagon, new models, etc. (rec.autos.makers.vw.watercooled)


Discuss Why 5 cylinders? in the Volkswagen forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
none2u
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 06:49 AM






Yea, Well, to bad they still want our money.
"Mike Smith" <mikeUNDERSCOREsmith (AT) acm (DOT) org> wrote

Quote:
Dave wrote:
Chicago Paddling-Fishing <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote:

Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors?

In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be
better?


I'm disappointed ...

There is one. It's called the TDI.

The Twincharger isn't so bad, either. Too bad VW hates Americans.

--
Mike Smith



Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Joseph Meehan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 06:55 AM






Mike Smith wrote:
Quote:
Dave wrote:
Chicago Paddling-Fishing <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote:

Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors?

In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4
be better? I'm disappointed ...

There is one.

It's called the TDI.

The Twincharger isn't so bad, either. Too bad VW hates Americans.
Maybe it is America that hates clean air. VW can't import cars into the
US if the US does not have fuel clean enough for them.

--
Joseph Meehan

Dia duit




Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
none2u
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 07:06 AM



VW is a performance car company first and foremost. They also change
direction very slowly. I would imagine we will see smaller engines from VW ,
or even another smaller car, in a few to 5 years. Of course that's if gas
stays about 3-4 bucks a gallon. If you want better gas mileage , you know
what to do. I,m not going to bash the Focus. It works for you. But it is a
mediocre car at best, that finally has most of the bugs out of it. The
Escort was a better car all the way around. And there are better cars ,
that cost less, are more reliable and get better mileage, then the Focus.
Ford and GM are in a world of hurt because they lack a world class small
car. Really, they only have about 2-3 cars between them that people actually
want.
"Chicago Paddling-Fishing" <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Regal53 <Regal53 (AT) bellsouth (DOT) net> wrote:
: The number of cylinders of an engine do not necessarily equate miles per
: gallon; Audi motto in the 1980's was "four are too few, six are too
many" to
: market the type 43 audi 5000. So my 1987 5000 quattro CS turbo has a
2.2L
: 5-cylinder, while my 1984 Porsche 944 had a 2.5L 4-cylinder motor. The
audi
: gets better mpg with 1 more cylinder. It's about displacement,
volumetric
: efficiency.

Sadly, the vw doesn't get better mileage, unless you consider 22/30
better...
(it's worse than last years models at a time when we really shouldn't be
going that direction)

The Focus has a 2.0l 4 cylinder with 136hp getting 27/37mpg, the Rabbit
has a 2.5l 5 cylinder with 150hp getting 22/30mpg... neither requires
premium... We are just hitting 70k miles on our 2000 Focus and so far, we
have only paid to replaced brakes and rear wheel bearings, not bad for a 6
year old car driven by my teenage daughter... i can't fairly compare it
against my 86 GTI though, as it's been thru some major repairs and is
driven by my teenage son...

I'll have to go drive one, but I'm not expecting to feel much difference
between 136hp and 150hp, but I would feel $10 difference in gas every
fillup pretty quickly...

--
John Nelson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page
http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org
(A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell)



Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Joseph Meehan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 08:58 AM



none2u wrote:
Quote:
VW is a performance car company first and foremost. They also change
direction very slowly. I would imagine we will see smaller engines
from VW , or even another smaller car, in a few to 5 years. Of
course that's if gas stays about 3-4 bucks a gallon.
In most of Europe, 3-4 dollars US per gallon would be a very low price.

Quote:
If you want
better gas mileage , you know what to do. I,m not going to bash the
Focus. It works for you. But it is a mediocre car at best, that
finally has most of the bugs out of it. The Escort was a better car
all the way around. And there are better cars , that cost less, are
more reliable and get better mileage, then the Focus. Ford and GM are
in a world of hurt because they lack a world class small car. Really,
they only have about 2-3 cars between them that people actually want.
"Chicago Paddling-Fishing" <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:ed5pgn$5j5$1 (AT) e250 (DOT) ripco.com...
Regal53 <Regal53 (AT) bellsouth (DOT) net> wrote:
The number of cylinders of an engine do not necessarily equate
miles per gallon; Audi motto in the 1980's was "four are too few,
six are too many" to market the type 43 audi 5000. So my 1987 5000
quattro CS turbo has a 2.2L 5-cylinder, while my 1984 Porsche 944
had a 2.5L 4-cylinder motor. The audi gets better mpg with 1 more
cylinder. It's about displacement, volumetric efficiency.

Sadly, the vw doesn't get better mileage, unless you consider 22/30
better...
(it's worse than last years models at a time when we really
shouldn't be going that direction)

The Focus has a 2.0l 4 cylinder with 136hp getting 27/37mpg, the
Rabbit has a 2.5l 5 cylinder with 150hp getting 22/30mpg... neither
requires premium... We are just hitting 70k miles on our 2000 Focus
and so far, we have only paid to replaced brakes and rear wheel
bearings, not bad for a 6 year old car driven by my teenage
daughter... i can't fairly compare it against my 86 GTI though, as
it's been thru some major repairs and is driven by my teenage son...

I'll have to go drive one, but I'm not expecting to feel much
difference between 136hp and 150hp, but I would feel $10 difference
in gas every fillup pretty quickly...

--
John Nelson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page
http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org
(A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to
Sell)


--
Joseph Meehan

Dia duit




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Mike Smith
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 11:46 AM



Joseph Meehan wrote:
Quote:
Mike Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:
Chicago Paddling-Fishing <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote:

Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors?

In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4
be better? I'm disappointed ...
There is one.

It's called the TDI.

The **Twincharger** isn't so bad, either. Too bad VW hates Americans.

Maybe it is America that hates clean air. VW can't import cars into the
US if the US does not have fuel clean enough for them.
The Twincharger engine would run just fine on US fuel.

--
Mike Smith


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Mike Smith
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 11:48 AM



Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote:
Quote:
I'll have to go drive one, but I'm not expecting to feel much difference
between 136hp and 150hp
Keep in mind that the Rabbit is also heavier than the Focus, thus
offsetting the extra power.

--
Mike Smith


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Chicago Paddling-Fishing
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 12:47 PM



none2u <none2u (AT) notrealatall (DOT) bye> wrote:
: VW is a performance car company first and foremost. They also change
: direction very slowly. I would imagine we will see smaller engines from VW ,
: or even another smaller car, in a few to 5 years. Of course that's if gas
: stays about 3-4 bucks a gallon. If you want better gas mileage , you know
: what to do. I,m not going to bash the Focus. It works for you. But it is a
: mediocre car at best, that finally has most of the bugs out of it. The
: Escort was a better car all the way around. And there are better cars ,
: that cost less, are more reliable and get better mileage, then the Focus.
: Ford and GM are in a world of hurt because they lack a world class small
: car. Really, they only have about 2-3 cars between them that people actually
: want.

Did you watch the WRC broadcasts on Speed Channel last year? I was very
surprised to see the Focus take 3 of the top 6 places in the series... I
didn't see any vw's and sort of enjoyed watching the WRX's burn up...

Like I said, I'll look at the Rabbit, but I'm not sure I'm going to like it
all that much (the dealer was real hot to get me to sit in one last year and
take it for a drive, thinking it would be so much better than my 86 GTI, but
I already have a 2.0 in mine with a new head ( 2 years old ) and it's a much
lighter car, so the new ones weren't as peppy... the other thing that got me
was the dealer just kept pricing so close to the vest it was frustrating)...

--
John Nelson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page
http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org
(A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell)

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
goose
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 08-31-2006 , 06:50 PM



Joseph Meehan wrote:
Quote:
Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote:

Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors?

In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be
better?


I'm disappointed ...


Well I have not heard that, but no matter. Additional cylinders means
less vibration for the same power.
Close; not "less vibration" with more cylinders, closer
to "smoother running" with more cylinders.

On each ignition a "shock" is applied to the crank
as the piston is forced down. A four cylinder engine
would receive a explosive force every half revolution.

The crank then slows down until the next "bang" that
gets it going again (half a revolution later). A twelve
cylinder engine on the other hand would get it's
"bang" every 1/6th of a revolution. This means that the
crank is kept in motion with less of a bang (because
it hasn't slowed down as much) than the 4 cylinder
engine.

A 4 cylinder slows down and speeds up twice in a
single revolution while the 12 cylinder is kept in
more-or-less constant motion, therefore it's smoother.

--
Have I offended you? Send flames to root@localhost
real email: lelanthran at gmail dot com
website : www.lelanthran.com


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Remco Meeder
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 09-01-2006 , 02:16 PM



none2u wrote:
Quote:
VW is a performance car company first and foremost. They also change
direction very slowly. I would imagine we will see smaller engines from VW ,
or even another smaller car, in a few to 5 years.
VW allready has these engines and they are available for quite some time...
In Europe VW allways offered small 1.3 liter engines in the Golf and
Polo. Later it became a 1.4 liter engine.
In the present time they offer the Fox and Polo (and the Ibiza, Cordoba
from Seat and the Fabia from Skoda) with 1.2 liter 3 cylinder engines.
Allso VW has a choice of 3 cylinder TDI engines with 1.2 and 1.4 liters.
The last one is available with 90bhp.

If enough people would request smaller engines from VW they will bring
them to the US as well. As long as most people want big engines they
wont bring the smaller units to the US.

Remco


Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Jo Bo
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Why 5 cylinders? - 09-02-2006 , 08:30 AM



Chicago.

As others have pointed out, "it ain't HP that you drive, it's torque". My 93
VW EV has a 5 cylinder 2.5 and it's 15 years old and does not burn a drop of
oil. But I sense you want the Ford Focus so go get one! If you want MPG's
get a 06 tdi while you can. You'll also get wheel spinning low end grunt
with your 50 MPG. My actual fuel consumption for 114k miles in a 99.5 jetta
tdi was 49.6 mpg. "Focus" on that.

JoBo

"Chicago Paddling-Fishing" <jwn (AT) ripco (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors?

In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be
better?


I'm disappointed ...

--
John Nelson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page
http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org
(A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell)



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.