With North American gas prices approaching European levels (and
European levels heading for the moon...), I've been looking around to
see if anyone has converted a Volvo to electric power?

What got me started was the Discovery Channel Canada's Daily Planet
episode that covered a Midwest high school student who electrified his
truck and is now working on doing the same to a Toyota Camry.

The Camry project is interesting because he appears to be using
lithium-polymer battery packs rather than the lead-acid type.
http://broadband.discoverychannel.ca/?vid=44930

If I do a conversion on my V40, it'll probably be diesel for now -- I
have to go 50KM (30 miles each way) to work, and that looks to be the
total limit for most battery systems -- no plug-ins at work to use.

byrocat wrote:

In the US we see conversions with 60+ mile ranges. They use
lead-acid batteries, and lots of them. I have wondered about using a 240
for this, as they have so much extra space in the engine bay and trunk...

Have you considered doing a battery conversion with a small
generator to partially recharge it, in order to extend the range?

60 mile range?.....I do 550 miles on one tank
of gas in a s80t6....






On Jul 23, 5:30*am, Leftie <N... (AT) Thanks (DOT) net> wrote:

Leftie wrote:
I have considered this on a 940 estate (lots of solar panel area). In
the process I found the best kept secret about electric cars.

You can easily extend the range of an electric drive car by using a
small petrol generator (or anything really..steam, Hydrogen, etc).
Typically you can expect 100mpg if you don't use the plug in charging,
300mpg cost equivalent if you do. Goes to show just how inefficient IC
driven cars are.

Combine with some solar panels and it might make the 25mile journey to
work free. Although Solar panels are pricey they do pay off, and now
Nano-solar can do panels for 1$ per watt, while less efficient than
silicon panels are in a new league in price. Just waiting for enough
production so we can buy them.

Volvo have a concept car with 4 wheel electric drive (4 motors) and 1.6L
petrol engine, called a plug-in hybrid. The petrol engine is not
connected mechanically to the wheels and is much more efficient than the
Prius type.

Electric may not have great range but it is so much cheaper/mile. The
only other down side is battery replacement, but I think the economy
more than compensates for this and there is plenty of work to do in
improvements and combining various storage methods.

And don't think Engine motors are weak, pound for pound they are around
4 times more powerful than a standard petrol engine. Downside is
batteries weight more than fuel, but comparing Li-Po
batteries+equivalent motor with a petrol power plant+fuel they weight,
perform and last for the same amount of time. Just look at the RC Models
these days, IC power is now much less popular than it was, especially
with newcommers. You can even get a single seater sport plane that runs
on electric alone, companies are looking at further scaling up.

The future is electric, the oil companies cannot kept it quiet any longer.

I quite liked the idea of starting a business converting cars, but needs
some significant development and investment. Old Volvo's would be
ideal as they are cheap and rust free.

--
Tony

" The future is electric, the oil companies cannot kept it quiet any
longer. "

Wouldn't walking be best? Best for the environment, cheapest?
Quiet?...











On Jul 23, 1:56*pm, Tony <n... (AT) nospamplease (DOT) com> wrote:

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
Yes of course it is. Can't really see it working though.

--
Tony

i asked a stupid question...just being a dickhead...i
guess.....butt...i have
to say it will be a while b4 we produce (mass produce) modes of
personal
transportation that rivals the gas/desel motor....pound for pound, $
for $..it
will be tough to beat fosil fuels...in the imed future.......at least,
IMHO......






On Jul 24, 12:46*pm, Tony <n... (AT) nospamplease (DOT) com> wrote:

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:

The advantage in using IC engines isn't in the engines - they are
very complex and inefficient. It's in the fuel, which has huge amounts
of solar energy pre-stored in it. Electric motors are vastly superior at
converting energy to transportation, and are very simple, inexpensive
and rugged. It's the storage mediums that we have to improve.

Good point Leftie! but in addition to the required improvements in storage
mediums, the *production* of electrical energy must get beyond the present
environmentally unfriendly methods which use coal and gas and oil,
especially since the extra demand for electrical energy would be enormous
when we all started to plug in our cars overnight. Nuclear too? Hydrogen
would burn clean in power stations to produce electrical energy, but would
need electrical energy to produce the Hydrogen! (From water by
electrolysis). "Fuel Cells" using Hydrogen are already in use in electric
vehicles, but large scale use for electrical energy generation has not been
contemplated.

What's left? Solar? Tidal? Wind? All are working at present but it
doesn't seem as if they could ever supplant the current (sorry.....)
polluting generating methods. Hydro is great, but sites are limited.

What's left? Put our Volvos up on blocks I guess........

Andy I.


: The advantage in using IC engines isn't in the engines - they are
: very complex and inefficient. It's in the fuel, which has huge amounts
: of solar energy pre-stored in it. Electric motors are vastly superior at
: converting energy to transportation, and are very simple, inexpensive
: and rugged. It's the storage mediums that we have to improve.

why do we need to store the energy in the car...why not
fig a way to transmit wireless to the mobile unit ?







On Jul 25, 12:15*am, Leftie <N... (AT) Thanks (DOT) net> wrote: